Metrics for prosthetic cervical margin integrity assessment after dental CAD/CAM milling: a critical analysis from engineering viewpoint.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Odontology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1007/s10266-025-01066-9
Nicolas Lebon, Laurent Tapie
{"title":"Metrics for prosthetic cervical margin integrity assessment after dental CAD/CAM milling: a critical analysis from engineering viewpoint.","authors":"Nicolas Lebon, Laurent Tapie","doi":"10.1007/s10266-025-01066-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dental prostheses have significantly evolved due to advances in Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology. CAD/CAM systems provide a variety of biomaterials like ceramics, Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network (PICN), and composites, which are preferred for their mechanical and aesthetic properties. However, ceramics, despite their popularity, are brittle and prone to chipping during the machining process, impacting the prosthesis's clinical functions, aesthetics, biological integrity, and mechanical performance. Chipping, especially at thin cervical margin, can cause visible defects, poor sealing, and bacterial growth, reducing prosthesis lifespan. Milling factors influence cervical margin integrity. Chipping assessment involves understanding biomaterial mechanical and machinability characteristics regarding dimensional characterization of milled prosthesis shape. Thus, different type of metrics, based on biomaterial properties or dimensional measurement can be used to assess chipping phenomenon for milled dental ceramics. These metrics are both, based on experimental studies found in literature, and proposed by this paper authors to fill the existing lacks. The brittleness index, based on the ratio between hardness and fracture toughness, predicts susceptibility to chipping after milling. Unidirectional dimensional metrics like the Chipping Factor and weighted Chipping Factor characterize the chipping ratio of the cervical margin. Advanced 2D and 3D metrics, including chip projected area, total weighted chip projected area, and Surface Aspect Ratio, offer more detailed assessments. 3D analysis involves comparing scanned files with CAD models to compute chipped volumes. The aim of this paper is to propose a critical analysis from an engineering viewpoint on metrics used to assess cervical margin integrity for milled dental prosthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19390,"journal":{"name":"Odontology","volume":" ","pages":"1220-1231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-025-01066-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dental prostheses have significantly evolved due to advances in Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology. CAD/CAM systems provide a variety of biomaterials like ceramics, Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network (PICN), and composites, which are preferred for their mechanical and aesthetic properties. However, ceramics, despite their popularity, are brittle and prone to chipping during the machining process, impacting the prosthesis's clinical functions, aesthetics, biological integrity, and mechanical performance. Chipping, especially at thin cervical margin, can cause visible defects, poor sealing, and bacterial growth, reducing prosthesis lifespan. Milling factors influence cervical margin integrity. Chipping assessment involves understanding biomaterial mechanical and machinability characteristics regarding dimensional characterization of milled prosthesis shape. Thus, different type of metrics, based on biomaterial properties or dimensional measurement can be used to assess chipping phenomenon for milled dental ceramics. These metrics are both, based on experimental studies found in literature, and proposed by this paper authors to fill the existing lacks. The brittleness index, based on the ratio between hardness and fracture toughness, predicts susceptibility to chipping after milling. Unidirectional dimensional metrics like the Chipping Factor and weighted Chipping Factor characterize the chipping ratio of the cervical margin. Advanced 2D and 3D metrics, including chip projected area, total weighted chip projected area, and Surface Aspect Ratio, offer more detailed assessments. 3D analysis involves comparing scanned files with CAD models to compute chipped volumes. The aim of this paper is to propose a critical analysis from an engineering viewpoint on metrics used to assess cervical margin integrity for milled dental prosthesis.

牙科CAD/CAM铣削后假体颈缘完整性评估的指标:从工程角度的关键分析。
由于计算机辅助设计和制造(CAD/CAM)技术的进步,牙科修复有了显著的发展。CAD/CAM系统提供各种生物材料,如陶瓷、聚合物渗透陶瓷网络(PICN)和复合材料,这些材料因其机械和美学特性而受到青睐。然而,尽管陶瓷很受欢迎,但在加工过程中,陶瓷很脆,容易碎裂,影响了假肢的临床功能、美学、生物完整性和机械性能。脱落,特别是在颈椎边缘,会导致明显的缺陷,密封性差,细菌生长,减少假体的使用寿命。铣削因素影响颈缘完整性。切屑评估包括了解生物材料的机械和可加工性特征,以及铣削假体形状的尺寸特征。因此,基于生物材料特性或尺寸测量的不同类型的指标可用于评估磨牙陶瓷的切屑现象。这两个指标都是基于文献中发现的实验研究,本文作者提出以填补现有的不足。脆性指数以硬度与断裂韧性之比为基础,预测铣削后的易碎性。单向度指标如切屑因子和加权切屑因子表征了宫颈缘的切屑率。先进的2D和3D指标,包括芯片投影面积、总加权芯片投影面积和表面纵横比,提供了更详细的评估。3D分析包括将扫描文件与CAD模型进行比较,以计算芯片体积。本文的目的是提出一个关键的分析,从工程的角度对指标用于评估颈椎缘完整性磨牙假体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Odontology
Odontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal Odontology covers all disciplines involved in the fields of dentistry and craniofacial research, including molecular studies related to oral health and disease. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics ranging from research on human dental pulp, to comparisons of analgesics in surgery, to analysis of biofilm properties of dental plaque.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信