{"title":"Combined use of immunoreactivities of Efp and ZCCHC3 for predicting prognosis of patients with triple-negative breast cancer.","authors":"Akihiro Fujimoto, Kazuhiro Ikeda, Keiichi Kinowaki, Takuya Ogura, Toshihiko Takeiwa, Hidetaka Kawabata, Akihiko Osaki, Kuniko Horie, Satoshi Inoue","doi":"10.1111/pin.13510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We previously reported that strong immunoreactivity (IR) of estrogen-responsive finger protein (Efp), also known as tripartite motif-containing 25 (TRIM25), predicts poor prognosis in patients with estrogen receptor-positive and -negative invasive breast cancers. In the present study, we investigated the clinicopathological role of Efp and ZCCHC3, the latter of which is an Efp interactor, in a triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cohort which was composed of 118 Japanese female breast cancer patients underwent surgical treatment. Efp and ZCCHC3 IRs were analyzed using specific antibodies for these proteins. We demonstrated that positive Efp IR was significantly associated with shorter distant disease-free survival (p = 0.0108) and that positive ZCCHC3 IR was also significantly associated with shorter distant disease-free survival (p = 0.0153). Notably, ZCCHC3 IR was positively associated with Efp IR (p = 0.003). When IRs of the two proteins were combined, double positivity was associated with shorter distant disease-free survival (p = 0.0007) and was an independent factor for poor prognosis. These results suggest that IR positivity of Efp and ZCCHC3 has clinical significance as a poor prognostic factor in patients with TNBC. Thus, we propose that the combined use of both IRs can be used as a prognostic marker for TNBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19806,"journal":{"name":"Pathology International","volume":" ","pages":"92-99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pin.13510","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We previously reported that strong immunoreactivity (IR) of estrogen-responsive finger protein (Efp), also known as tripartite motif-containing 25 (TRIM25), predicts poor prognosis in patients with estrogen receptor-positive and -negative invasive breast cancers. In the present study, we investigated the clinicopathological role of Efp and ZCCHC3, the latter of which is an Efp interactor, in a triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cohort which was composed of 118 Japanese female breast cancer patients underwent surgical treatment. Efp and ZCCHC3 IRs were analyzed using specific antibodies for these proteins. We demonstrated that positive Efp IR was significantly associated with shorter distant disease-free survival (p = 0.0108) and that positive ZCCHC3 IR was also significantly associated with shorter distant disease-free survival (p = 0.0153). Notably, ZCCHC3 IR was positively associated with Efp IR (p = 0.003). When IRs of the two proteins were combined, double positivity was associated with shorter distant disease-free survival (p = 0.0007) and was an independent factor for poor prognosis. These results suggest that IR positivity of Efp and ZCCHC3 has clinical significance as a poor prognostic factor in patients with TNBC. Thus, we propose that the combined use of both IRs can be used as a prognostic marker for TNBC.
期刊介绍:
Pathology International is the official English journal of the Japanese Society of Pathology, publishing articles of excellence in human and experimental pathology. The Journal focuses on the morphological study of the disease process and/or mechanisms. For human pathology, morphological investigation receives priority but manuscripts describing the result of any ancillary methods (cellular, chemical, immunological and molecular biological) that complement the morphology are accepted. Manuscript on experimental pathology that approach pathologenesis or mechanisms of disease processes are expected to report on the data obtained from models using cellular, biochemical, molecular biological, animal, immunological or other methods in conjunction with morphology. Manuscripts that report data on laboratory medicine (clinical pathology) without significant morphological contribution are not accepted.