Enhancing Hepatitis C Virus Testing, Linkage to Care, and Treatment Commencement in Hospitals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf056
Rebecca Mathews, Claudia Shen, Michael W Traeger, Helen M O'Brien, Christine Roder, Margaret E Hellard, Joseph S Doyle
{"title":"Enhancing Hepatitis C Virus Testing, Linkage to Care, and Treatment Commencement in Hospitals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Rebecca Mathews, Claudia Shen, Michael W Traeger, Helen M O'Brien, Christine Roder, Margaret E Hellard, Joseph S Doyle","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The hospital-led interventions yielding the best hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing and treatment uptake are poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies assessing outcomes of hospital-led interventions for HCV antibody or RNA testing uptake, linkage to care, or direct-acting antiviral commencement compared with usual care, a historical comparator, or control group. We systematically reviewed hospital-led interventions delivered in inpatient units, outpatient clinics, or emergency departments. Random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled odds ratios [pORs] measuring associations between interventions and outcomes. Subgroup analyses explored outcomes by intervention type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7872 abstracts were screened with 23 studies included. Twelve studies (222 868 participants) reported antibody testing uptake, 5 (n = 4987) reported RNA testing uptake, 7 (n = 3185) reported linkage to care, and 4 (n = 1344) reported treatment commencement. Hospital-led interventions were associated with increased antibody testing uptake (pOR, 5.83 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.49-13.61]; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 99.9%), RNA testing uptake (pOR, 10.65 [95% CI, 1.70-66.50]; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 97.9%), and linkage to care (pOR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.10-2.79]; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 79.9%) when data were pooled and assessed against comparators. Automated opt-out testing (5 studies: pOR, 16.13 [95% CI, 3.35-77.66]), reflex RNA testing (4 studies: pOR, 25.04 [95% CI, 3.63-172.7]), and care coordination and financial incentives (4 studies: pOR, 2.73 [95% CI, 1.85-4.03]) showed the greatest increases in antibody and RNA testing uptake and linkage to care, respectively. No intervention increased uptake at all care cascade steps.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated antibody and reflex RNA testing increase HCV testing uptake in hospitals but have limited impact on linkage to treatment. Other interventions promoting linkage must be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 2","pages":"ofaf056"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The hospital-led interventions yielding the best hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing and treatment uptake are poorly understood.

Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies assessing outcomes of hospital-led interventions for HCV antibody or RNA testing uptake, linkage to care, or direct-acting antiviral commencement compared with usual care, a historical comparator, or control group. We systematically reviewed hospital-led interventions delivered in inpatient units, outpatient clinics, or emergency departments. Random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled odds ratios [pORs] measuring associations between interventions and outcomes. Subgroup analyses explored outcomes by intervention type.

Results: A total of 7872 abstracts were screened with 23 studies included. Twelve studies (222 868 participants) reported antibody testing uptake, 5 (n = 4987) reported RNA testing uptake, 7 (n = 3185) reported linkage to care, and 4 (n = 1344) reported treatment commencement. Hospital-led interventions were associated with increased antibody testing uptake (pOR, 5.83 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.49-13.61]; I 2 = 99.9%), RNA testing uptake (pOR, 10.65 [95% CI, 1.70-66.50]; I 2 = 97.9%), and linkage to care (pOR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.10-2.79]; I 2 = 79.9%) when data were pooled and assessed against comparators. Automated opt-out testing (5 studies: pOR, 16.13 [95% CI, 3.35-77.66]), reflex RNA testing (4 studies: pOR, 25.04 [95% CI, 3.63-172.7]), and care coordination and financial incentives (4 studies: pOR, 2.73 [95% CI, 1.85-4.03]) showed the greatest increases in antibody and RNA testing uptake and linkage to care, respectively. No intervention increased uptake at all care cascade steps.

Conclusions: Automated antibody and reflex RNA testing increase HCV testing uptake in hospitals but have limited impact on linkage to treatment. Other interventions promoting linkage must be explored.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信