Sarah Glynne, Daniel Reisel, Aini Kamal, Louise Newson
{"title":"Patient experience of menopause care after breast cancer in the UK: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Sarah Glynne, Daniel Reisel, Aini Kamal, Louise Newson","doi":"10.1097/GME.0000000000002504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore women's experience of menopause care after breast cancer in the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey incorporating the validated Shared Decision Making SDM-Q-9 questionnaire was disseminated via social media to breast cancer survivors in the UK.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,195 women completed the survey. The menopause symptom burden was high (99.7%). Fear of recurrence was the dominant concern for 55.6% of women, but 44.4% were more concerned about quality of life and future risk of long-term conditions associated with estrogen deficiency. Women further from diagnosis were less concerned about recurrence (fear of recurrence was the dominant concern for 58.6% of women within 2 y of diagnosis vs. 43.1% of women more than 15 y from diagnosis, P = 0.001). Of all women, 68.3% were offered treatment (nonhormone treatment, 58.5%; vaginal hormones, 35.5%; menopause hormone therapy, 13.1%; testosterone, 10.1%). Menopause specialists were more likely to prescribe MHT versus nonmenopause specialists (68.2% vs. 31.8%, P < 0.0001); GP menopause specialists were more likely to prescribe testosterone versus gynecologist menopause specialists (60.8% vs. 39.2%, P < 0.0001). Of all women, 49.6% who were not offered menopause hormone therapy were willing to consider it, and 83.7% wanted more information about menopause hormone therapy. Information provision and time allocated to menopause-related discussion were poor (<10 min for 73.52% of women). Involvement in menopause-related treatment decisions was low (SDM-Q-9 median score, 11.1/100; IQR, 0.0-28.9). Women who consulted a menopause specialist (30.2%) were significantly more able to discuss their concerns (P < 0.001), were given significantly more time (>10 min for 75.6%, P < 0.001), and felt significantly more involved in menopause-related treatment decisions (P < 0.001). Overall, 96% of women wanted more support for menopausal symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many women in the study cohort had unmet menopause-related health needs after breast cancer, and the quality of menopause care received was poor. Most women felt uninvolved in menopause-related treatment decisions. Women experienced higher quality menopause care if they had access to a menopause specialist.</p>","PeriodicalId":18435,"journal":{"name":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002504","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to explore women's experience of menopause care after breast cancer in the UK.
Methods: An online survey incorporating the validated Shared Decision Making SDM-Q-9 questionnaire was disseminated via social media to breast cancer survivors in the UK.
Results: A total of 1,195 women completed the survey. The menopause symptom burden was high (99.7%). Fear of recurrence was the dominant concern for 55.6% of women, but 44.4% were more concerned about quality of life and future risk of long-term conditions associated with estrogen deficiency. Women further from diagnosis were less concerned about recurrence (fear of recurrence was the dominant concern for 58.6% of women within 2 y of diagnosis vs. 43.1% of women more than 15 y from diagnosis, P = 0.001). Of all women, 68.3% were offered treatment (nonhormone treatment, 58.5%; vaginal hormones, 35.5%; menopause hormone therapy, 13.1%; testosterone, 10.1%). Menopause specialists were more likely to prescribe MHT versus nonmenopause specialists (68.2% vs. 31.8%, P < 0.0001); GP menopause specialists were more likely to prescribe testosterone versus gynecologist menopause specialists (60.8% vs. 39.2%, P < 0.0001). Of all women, 49.6% who were not offered menopause hormone therapy were willing to consider it, and 83.7% wanted more information about menopause hormone therapy. Information provision and time allocated to menopause-related discussion were poor (<10 min for 73.52% of women). Involvement in menopause-related treatment decisions was low (SDM-Q-9 median score, 11.1/100; IQR, 0.0-28.9). Women who consulted a menopause specialist (30.2%) were significantly more able to discuss their concerns (P < 0.001), were given significantly more time (>10 min for 75.6%, P < 0.001), and felt significantly more involved in menopause-related treatment decisions (P < 0.001). Overall, 96% of women wanted more support for menopausal symptoms.
Conclusions: Many women in the study cohort had unmet menopause-related health needs after breast cancer, and the quality of menopause care received was poor. Most women felt uninvolved in menopause-related treatment decisions. Women experienced higher quality menopause care if they had access to a menopause specialist.
期刊介绍:
Menopause, published monthly, provides a forum for new research, applied basic science, and clinical guidelines on all aspects of menopause. The scope and usefulness of the journal extend beyond gynecology, encompassing many varied biomedical areas, including internal medicine, family practice, medical subspecialties such as cardiology and geriatrics, epidemiology, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, and pharmacology. This forum is essential to help integrate these areas, highlight needs for future research, and enhance health care.