Patient experience of menopause care after breast cancer in the UK: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sarah Glynne, Daniel Reisel, Aini Kamal, Louise Newson
{"title":"Patient experience of menopause care after breast cancer in the UK: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Sarah Glynne, Daniel Reisel, Aini Kamal, Louise Newson","doi":"10.1097/GME.0000000000002504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore women's experience of menopause care after breast cancer in the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey incorporating the validated Shared Decision Making SDM-Q-9 questionnaire was disseminated via social media to breast cancer survivors in the UK.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,195 women completed the survey. The menopause symptom burden was high (99.7%). Fear of recurrence was the dominant concern for 55.6% of women, but 44.4% were more concerned about quality of life and future risk of long-term conditions associated with estrogen deficiency. Women further from diagnosis were less concerned about recurrence (fear of recurrence was the dominant concern for 58.6% of women within 2 y of diagnosis vs. 43.1% of women more than 15 y from diagnosis, P = 0.001). Of all women, 68.3% were offered treatment (nonhormone treatment, 58.5%; vaginal hormones, 35.5%; menopause hormone therapy, 13.1%; testosterone, 10.1%). Menopause specialists were more likely to prescribe MHT versus nonmenopause specialists (68.2% vs. 31.8%, P < 0.0001); GP menopause specialists were more likely to prescribe testosterone versus gynecologist menopause specialists (60.8% vs. 39.2%, P < 0.0001). Of all women, 49.6% who were not offered menopause hormone therapy were willing to consider it, and 83.7% wanted more information about menopause hormone therapy. Information provision and time allocated to menopause-related discussion were poor (<10 min for 73.52% of women). Involvement in menopause-related treatment decisions was low (SDM-Q-9 median score, 11.1/100; IQR, 0.0-28.9). Women who consulted a menopause specialist (30.2%) were significantly more able to discuss their concerns (P < 0.001), were given significantly more time (>10 min for 75.6%, P < 0.001), and felt significantly more involved in menopause-related treatment decisions (P < 0.001). Overall, 96% of women wanted more support for menopausal symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many women in the study cohort had unmet menopause-related health needs after breast cancer, and the quality of menopause care received was poor. Most women felt uninvolved in menopause-related treatment decisions. Women experienced higher quality menopause care if they had access to a menopause specialist.</p>","PeriodicalId":18435,"journal":{"name":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002504","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to explore women's experience of menopause care after breast cancer in the UK.

Methods: An online survey incorporating the validated Shared Decision Making SDM-Q-9 questionnaire was disseminated via social media to breast cancer survivors in the UK.

Results: A total of 1,195 women completed the survey. The menopause symptom burden was high (99.7%). Fear of recurrence was the dominant concern for 55.6% of women, but 44.4% were more concerned about quality of life and future risk of long-term conditions associated with estrogen deficiency. Women further from diagnosis were less concerned about recurrence (fear of recurrence was the dominant concern for 58.6% of women within 2 y of diagnosis vs. 43.1% of women more than 15 y from diagnosis, P = 0.001). Of all women, 68.3% were offered treatment (nonhormone treatment, 58.5%; vaginal hormones, 35.5%; menopause hormone therapy, 13.1%; testosterone, 10.1%). Menopause specialists were more likely to prescribe MHT versus nonmenopause specialists (68.2% vs. 31.8%, P < 0.0001); GP menopause specialists were more likely to prescribe testosterone versus gynecologist menopause specialists (60.8% vs. 39.2%, P < 0.0001). Of all women, 49.6% who were not offered menopause hormone therapy were willing to consider it, and 83.7% wanted more information about menopause hormone therapy. Information provision and time allocated to menopause-related discussion were poor (<10 min for 73.52% of women). Involvement in menopause-related treatment decisions was low (SDM-Q-9 median score, 11.1/100; IQR, 0.0-28.9). Women who consulted a menopause specialist (30.2%) were significantly more able to discuss their concerns (P < 0.001), were given significantly more time (>10 min for 75.6%, P < 0.001), and felt significantly more involved in menopause-related treatment decisions (P < 0.001). Overall, 96% of women wanted more support for menopausal symptoms.

Conclusions: Many women in the study cohort had unmet menopause-related health needs after breast cancer, and the quality of menopause care received was poor. Most women felt uninvolved in menopause-related treatment decisions. Women experienced higher quality menopause care if they had access to a menopause specialist.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Menopause, published monthly, provides a forum for new research, applied basic science, and clinical guidelines on all aspects of menopause. The scope and usefulness of the journal extend beyond gynecology, encompassing many varied biomedical areas, including internal medicine, family practice, medical subspecialties such as cardiology and geriatrics, epidemiology, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, and pharmacology. This forum is essential to help integrate these areas, highlight needs for future research, and enhance health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信