Are the Risk Factors for Developing Type 1 and Type 2 Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Different?

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Yunhui Tang MD, PhD, Cuifeng Qian MD, PhD, Man Li MD, PhD, Min Zhao MD, PhD, Qi Chen MD, PhD
{"title":"Are the Risk Factors for Developing Type 1 and Type 2 Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Different?","authors":"Yunhui Tang MD, PhD,&nbsp;Cuifeng Qian MD, PhD,&nbsp;Man Li MD, PhD,&nbsp;Min Zhao MD, PhD,&nbsp;Qi Chen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jum.16662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a life-threatening complication of pregnancy. Early termination of pregnancy is recommended because of the potential risks of uterine rupture if the pregnancy continues. CSP is clinically divided into type 1 and type 2, based on the site of embryo implantation and grow direction of the gestational sac. The clinical risk and treatment options may vary between these subtypes. Identifying the differences and potential factors impacting the development of each type could contribute to improved clinical management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study included 143 women with type 1 CSP and 200 women with type 2 CSP women, diagnosed between January 2020 and July 2023. The primary objective was to analyze the differences in clinical characteristics between the 2 CSP subtypes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Body mass index, the number of previous CSPs, elective abortions, gravidity, and parity were not significantly different between the 2 subtypes. Similarly, the interval between the last cesarean section and the current CSP was not associated with developing the 2 subtypes. However, women with more than 3 prior cesarean sections had an increased risk of developing type 1 CSP. In contrast, vaginal bleeding before diagnosis was more frequently associated with type 2 CSP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study with a large sample size found that despite type 2 CSP involving deeper myometrial invasion, the 2 subtypes share many clinical characteristics. Moreover, the clinical risk factors for distinguishing between type 1 and type 2 CSP are limited. Future research to identify predictors for CSP classification is required.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"44 6","pages":"1027-1032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jum.16662","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jum.16662","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a life-threatening complication of pregnancy. Early termination of pregnancy is recommended because of the potential risks of uterine rupture if the pregnancy continues. CSP is clinically divided into type 1 and type 2, based on the site of embryo implantation and grow direction of the gestational sac. The clinical risk and treatment options may vary between these subtypes. Identifying the differences and potential factors impacting the development of each type could contribute to improved clinical management.

Methods

This retrospective study included 143 women with type 1 CSP and 200 women with type 2 CSP women, diagnosed between January 2020 and July 2023. The primary objective was to analyze the differences in clinical characteristics between the 2 CSP subtypes.

Results

Body mass index, the number of previous CSPs, elective abortions, gravidity, and parity were not significantly different between the 2 subtypes. Similarly, the interval between the last cesarean section and the current CSP was not associated with developing the 2 subtypes. However, women with more than 3 prior cesarean sections had an increased risk of developing type 1 CSP. In contrast, vaginal bleeding before diagnosis was more frequently associated with type 2 CSP.

Conclusions

Our study with a large sample size found that despite type 2 CSP involving deeper myometrial invasion, the 2 subtypes share many clinical characteristics. Moreover, the clinical risk factors for distinguishing between type 1 and type 2 CSP are limited. Future research to identify predictors for CSP classification is required.

1型和2型瘢痕妊娠的危险因素不同吗?
目的:剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)是一种危及生命的妊娠并发症。建议尽早终止妊娠,因为如果继续妊娠有子宫破裂的潜在风险。根据胚胎着床部位和孕囊生长方向,临床上分为1型和2型。临床风险和治疗方案在这些亚型之间可能有所不同。识别影响每种类型发展的差异和潜在因素有助于改善临床管理。方法:这项回顾性研究包括143名1型CSP女性和200名2型CSP女性,诊断于2020年1月至2023年7月。主要目的是分析两种CSP亚型之间临床特征的差异。结果:体重指数、既往csp数、选择性流产、妊娠、胎次在两亚型间无显著差异。同样,最后一次剖宫产和当前CSP之间的时间间隔与两种亚型的发生无关。然而,有3次以上剖宫产史的妇女发生1型CSP的风险增加。相比之下,诊断前阴道出血更常与2型CSP相关。结论:我们的大样本量研究发现,尽管2型CSP涉及更深的肌层侵犯,但这两种亚型有许多共同的临床特征。此外,区分1型和2型CSP的临床危险因素有限。未来的研究需要确定CSP分类的预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信