Field evaluation of nanopore targeted next-generation sequencing to predict drug-resistant tuberculosis from native sputum in South Africa and Zambia.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Tiana C Schwab, Lavania Joseph, Andrew Moono, Pauline C Göller, Mamello Motsei, Guy Muula, Denise Evans, Stefan Neuenschwander, Gunar Günther, Carolyn Bolton, Peter M Keller, Alban Ramette, Matthias Egger, Shaheed V Omar, Lukas Fenner
{"title":"Field evaluation of nanopore targeted next-generation sequencing to predict drug-resistant tuberculosis from native sputum in South Africa and Zambia.","authors":"Tiana C Schwab, Lavania Joseph, Andrew Moono, Pauline C Göller, Mamello Motsei, Guy Muula, Denise Evans, Stefan Neuenschwander, Gunar Günther, Carolyn Bolton, Peter M Keller, Alban Ramette, Matthias Egger, Shaheed V Omar, Lukas Fenner","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01390-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid and comprehensive drug susceptibility testing (DST) is essential for diagnosing and treating drug-resistant tuberculosis effectively, and next-generation sequencing can be an effective genotypic DST method. We implemented and evaluated the performance of a nanopore targeted sequencing assay, called the Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Test (TBDR, Oxford Nanopore Diagnostics, Ltd., United Kingdom), which predicts drug resistance to 16 TB drugs, at a South African reference laboratory and a district diagnostic laboratory in Zambia. We compared the sequencing success rates between unprocessed and decontaminated sputum samples and determined the diagnostic accuracy against local DST (Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, Xpert MTB/XDR, and BD BACTEC MGIT phenotypic DST). We prospectively sequenced 236 samples and have 148 samples with sequencing results from unprocessed and decontaminated sputum. We obtained successful sequencing results from 66.4% (94/148) unprocessed sputum samples and 75% (111/148) decontaminated samples. Sequencing success rates at the two sites differed, with 50.7% (36/71) successful sequencing results from unprocessed sputum in Zambia and 75.3% (58/77) in South Africa. Samples with \"low\" bacterial load, measured by Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, tended to produce fewer successful sequencing results. TBDR sequencing predicted resistances in 48 samples, detecting resistance for rifampicin (<i>n</i> = 41) and isoniazid (<i>n</i> = 20), as well as 10 second-line drugs (<i>n</i> = 15). Sensitivity was variable compared to phenotypic DST, ranging from 33 (ethionamide) to 94% (rifampicin), while specificity remained above 90% for all drugs, except clofazimine. The TBDR assay can provide rapid, comprehensive genotypic DST. Technical and operational challenges need to be addressed for its broader implementation in high tuberculosis-burden settings.IMPORTANCEThis study illustrates the use of the Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Test (TBDR, Oxford Nanopore Diagnostics, Ltd., United Kingdom) as a rapid drug susceptibility testing (DST) approach for diagnosing drug-resistant TB in the high TB-burden countries of South Africa and Zambia. The TBDR assay predicts resistance to 16 TB drugs, including first- and second-line treatments. By implementing the TBDR assay in a national reference laboratory in South Africa and a district diagnostic laboratory in Zambia, we demonstrate how this technology can provide faster diagnostic results (days) compared to traditional phenotypic DST methods (~2 months), with adequate sensitivity. Missed resistances compared to phenotypic DST indicate that technical improvements are needed. Successful sequencing from unprocessed and decontaminated sputum samples at different sites suggests feasibility in diverse settings, though operational challenges remain. Implementing this rapid, comprehensive DST approach could enhance drug-resistant tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment, ultimately improving patient outcomes and helping to combat tuberculosis in high-burden regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0139024"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01390-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid and comprehensive drug susceptibility testing (DST) is essential for diagnosing and treating drug-resistant tuberculosis effectively, and next-generation sequencing can be an effective genotypic DST method. We implemented and evaluated the performance of a nanopore targeted sequencing assay, called the Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Test (TBDR, Oxford Nanopore Diagnostics, Ltd., United Kingdom), which predicts drug resistance to 16 TB drugs, at a South African reference laboratory and a district diagnostic laboratory in Zambia. We compared the sequencing success rates between unprocessed and decontaminated sputum samples and determined the diagnostic accuracy against local DST (Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, Xpert MTB/XDR, and BD BACTEC MGIT phenotypic DST). We prospectively sequenced 236 samples and have 148 samples with sequencing results from unprocessed and decontaminated sputum. We obtained successful sequencing results from 66.4% (94/148) unprocessed sputum samples and 75% (111/148) decontaminated samples. Sequencing success rates at the two sites differed, with 50.7% (36/71) successful sequencing results from unprocessed sputum in Zambia and 75.3% (58/77) in South Africa. Samples with "low" bacterial load, measured by Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, tended to produce fewer successful sequencing results. TBDR sequencing predicted resistances in 48 samples, detecting resistance for rifampicin (n = 41) and isoniazid (n = 20), as well as 10 second-line drugs (n = 15). Sensitivity was variable compared to phenotypic DST, ranging from 33 (ethionamide) to 94% (rifampicin), while specificity remained above 90% for all drugs, except clofazimine. The TBDR assay can provide rapid, comprehensive genotypic DST. Technical and operational challenges need to be addressed for its broader implementation in high tuberculosis-burden settings.IMPORTANCEThis study illustrates the use of the Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Test (TBDR, Oxford Nanopore Diagnostics, Ltd., United Kingdom) as a rapid drug susceptibility testing (DST) approach for diagnosing drug-resistant TB in the high TB-burden countries of South Africa and Zambia. The TBDR assay predicts resistance to 16 TB drugs, including first- and second-line treatments. By implementing the TBDR assay in a national reference laboratory in South Africa and a district diagnostic laboratory in Zambia, we demonstrate how this technology can provide faster diagnostic results (days) compared to traditional phenotypic DST methods (~2 months), with adequate sensitivity. Missed resistances compared to phenotypic DST indicate that technical improvements are needed. Successful sequencing from unprocessed and decontaminated sputum samples at different sites suggests feasibility in diverse settings, though operational challenges remain. Implementing this rapid, comprehensive DST approach could enhance drug-resistant tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment, ultimately improving patient outcomes and helping to combat tuberculosis in high-burden regions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信