Development and psychometric validation of a clinical instrument for infant feeding and lifestyle evaluation.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Daniel Chan, Jiaying Lin, Ruther Teo Zheng, Chengsi Ong, Chee Wai Ku, Benny Kai Guo Loo, Jerry Kok Yen Chan, Mei Chien Chua, Fabian Yap, See Ling Loy
{"title":"Development and psychometric validation of a clinical instrument for infant feeding and lifestyle evaluation.","authors":"Daniel Chan, Jiaying Lin, Ruther Teo Zheng, Chengsi Ong, Chee Wai Ku, Benny Kai Guo Loo, Jerry Kok Yen Chan, Mei Chien Chua, Fabian Yap, See Ling Loy","doi":"10.1002/jpn3.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is an absence of a comprehensive clinical instrument to assess and track the development of non-ideal feeding practices and lifestyle behaviours in early childhood. Our primary aim was to develop and validate an assessment instrument, called Feeding, Lifestyle, Activity Goals (FLAGs), designed to serve as a feeding, lifestyle and activity behaviour checklist for children aged 0-2 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study took place between January and May 2023. Experts evaluated content validity using the criteria of relevance, clarity, simplicity and ambiguity, to calculate the item content validity index (I-CVI) and scale CVI (S-CVI) (acceptable cutoff ≥ 0.80). Face validity was assessed by caregivers. Repeated assessments were also performed to determine test-retest reliability based on intra-class correlation (ICC) (acceptable cutoff > 0.75). Construct validity was established through principal component analysis (PCA), and internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's α coefficient (acceptable cutoff ≥ 0.70).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FLAGs consists of 19 items, with a I-CVI of 1.00 in 12 out of 19 items, and S-CVI average of >0.90 for relevance, simplicity and clarity. Among 198 caregivers, 99.0% responded 'agree' and 'strongly agree' in the criteria of clarity and ambiguity; 99.5% in criterion of relevance, and 100% in criterion of simplicity. PCA showed a two-component structure (55.9% variance). Overall Cronbach's α was 0.71. Participants repeated FLAGs assessment on an average of 9 days apart, with ICC of 0.861 (p < 0.001) for the total FLAGs scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have developed an instrument which assesses an infant's feeding and lifestyle behaviour from 0 to 2 years, and this has been assessed to have acceptable validity and reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.70012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is an absence of a comprehensive clinical instrument to assess and track the development of non-ideal feeding practices and lifestyle behaviours in early childhood. Our primary aim was to develop and validate an assessment instrument, called Feeding, Lifestyle, Activity Goals (FLAGs), designed to serve as a feeding, lifestyle and activity behaviour checklist for children aged 0-2 years.

Methods: This study took place between January and May 2023. Experts evaluated content validity using the criteria of relevance, clarity, simplicity and ambiguity, to calculate the item content validity index (I-CVI) and scale CVI (S-CVI) (acceptable cutoff ≥ 0.80). Face validity was assessed by caregivers. Repeated assessments were also performed to determine test-retest reliability based on intra-class correlation (ICC) (acceptable cutoff > 0.75). Construct validity was established through principal component analysis (PCA), and internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's α coefficient (acceptable cutoff ≥ 0.70).

Results: FLAGs consists of 19 items, with a I-CVI of 1.00 in 12 out of 19 items, and S-CVI average of >0.90 for relevance, simplicity and clarity. Among 198 caregivers, 99.0% responded 'agree' and 'strongly agree' in the criteria of clarity and ambiguity; 99.5% in criterion of relevance, and 100% in criterion of simplicity. PCA showed a two-component structure (55.9% variance). Overall Cronbach's α was 0.71. Participants repeated FLAGs assessment on an average of 9 days apart, with ICC of 0.861 (p < 0.001) for the total FLAGs scores.

Conclusions: We have developed an instrument which assesses an infant's feeding and lifestyle behaviour from 0 to 2 years, and this has been assessed to have acceptable validity and reliability.

婴儿喂养和生活方式评估临床仪器的开发和心理计量学验证。
目的:缺乏一种全面的临床工具来评估和跟踪儿童早期非理想喂养习惯和生活方式行为的发展。我们的主要目的是开发和验证一种评估工具,称为喂养,生活方式,活动目标(FLAGs),旨在作为0-2岁儿童的喂养,生活方式和活动行为清单。方法:本研究于2023年1月至5月进行。专家使用相关性、清晰性、简单性和模糊性标准评估内容效度,计算项目内容效度指数(I-CVI)和量表CVI (S-CVI)(可接受截止≥0.80)。面部效度由照顾者评估。还进行了重复评估,以确定基于类内相关性(ICC)的重测信度(可接受截断> 0.75)。通过主成分分析(PCA)确定结构效度,采用Cronbach’s α系数(可接受截断≥0.70)衡量内部一致性。结果:FLAGs由19个条目组成,19个条目中有12个条目的I-CVI为1.00,相关性、简单性和清晰度的S-CVI平均为>0.90。在198名护理人员中,99.0%的人在清晰性和模糊性的标准中回答“同意”和“非常同意”;相关性标准为99.5%,简单性标准为100%。主成分分析显示双成分结构(方差为55.9%)。总体Cronbach’s α为0.71。参与者平均间隔9天重复一次FLAGs评估,ICC为0.861 (p)。结论:我们开发了一种评估0 - 2岁婴儿喂养和生活方式行为的工具,并已被评估为具有可接受的效度和信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
467
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (JPGN) provides a forum for original papers and reviews dealing with pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, including normal and abnormal functions of the alimentary tract and its associated organs, including the salivary glands, pancreas, gallbladder, and liver. Particular emphasis is on development and its relation to infant and childhood nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信