Cesare Cuspidi, Rita Facchetti, Elisa Gherbesi, Fosca Quarti-Trevano, Jennifer Vanoli, Giuseppe Mancia, Guido Grassi
{"title":"Increased arterial stiffness and left ventricular remodelling as markers of masked hypertension: findings from the PAMELA population.","authors":"Cesare Cuspidi, Rita Facchetti, Elisa Gherbesi, Fosca Quarti-Trevano, Jennifer Vanoli, Giuseppe Mancia, Guido Grassi","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000003970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The value of the association of arterial stiffness with left ventricular concentric remodelling/left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) assessed by echocardiography, for prediction of masked hypertension defined by office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in the general population is largely undefined. We investigated this topic in the participants to the Pressioni Monitorate E Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 272 participants (153 normotensives and 119 with masked hypertension) who attended the second and third survey of the PAMELA study performed after 10 and 25 years from the initial evaluation. Data collection included medical history, physical examination, blood tests, office, ABPM, echocardiographic and Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to normotensive individuals, participants with masked hypertension were younger, had significantly higher office, home, mean 24-h, day-time, night-time SBP/DBP and heart rate. The likelihood of having masked hypertension, was approximately more than two-fold higher [odds ratio (OR) = 2.29, confidence interval (CI): 1.01-5.31, P = 0.04] in participants with increased CAVI and left ventricular remodelling/LVH compared to their counterparts without organ damage. This association showed a unique value in identifying masked hypertension compared to both isolated markers of organ damage (OR = 1.69, P = 0.15 for increased CAVI and OR = 0.82, P = 0.80 for left ventricular remodelling/LVH), after adjusting for age, sex, office SBP/DBP, antihypertensive treatment and diabetes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study offers a new piece of evidence of the key value of looking for both vascular and cardiac organ damage to unmask MH and improve its clinical management in the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003970","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The value of the association of arterial stiffness with left ventricular concentric remodelling/left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) assessed by echocardiography, for prediction of masked hypertension defined by office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in the general population is largely undefined. We investigated this topic in the participants to the Pressioni Monitorate E Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study.
Methods: The study included 272 participants (153 normotensives and 119 with masked hypertension) who attended the second and third survey of the PAMELA study performed after 10 and 25 years from the initial evaluation. Data collection included medical history, physical examination, blood tests, office, ABPM, echocardiographic and Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) measurements.
Results: Compared to normotensive individuals, participants with masked hypertension were younger, had significantly higher office, home, mean 24-h, day-time, night-time SBP/DBP and heart rate. The likelihood of having masked hypertension, was approximately more than two-fold higher [odds ratio (OR) = 2.29, confidence interval (CI): 1.01-5.31, P = 0.04] in participants with increased CAVI and left ventricular remodelling/LVH compared to their counterparts without organ damage. This association showed a unique value in identifying masked hypertension compared to both isolated markers of organ damage (OR = 1.69, P = 0.15 for increased CAVI and OR = 0.82, P = 0.80 for left ventricular remodelling/LVH), after adjusting for age, sex, office SBP/DBP, antihypertensive treatment and diabetes.
Conclusion: The present study offers a new piece of evidence of the key value of looking for both vascular and cardiac organ damage to unmask MH and improve its clinical management in the general population.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.