Joint statement on evidence-based practices in mechanical ventilation: suggestions from two Brazilian medical societies.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia Pub Date : 2025-02-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.36416/1806-3756/e20240255
Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Arthur Oswaldo de Abreu Vianna, Bruno Valle Pinheiro, Israel Silva Maia, Sérgio Vasconcellos Baldisserotto, Alexandre Marini Isola
{"title":"Joint statement on evidence-based practices in mechanical ventilation: suggestions from two Brazilian medical societies.","authors":"Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Arthur Oswaldo de Abreu Vianna, Bruno Valle Pinheiro, Israel Silva Maia, Sérgio Vasconcellos Baldisserotto, Alexandre Marini Isola","doi":"10.36416/1806-3756/e20240255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mechanical ventilation can be a life-saving intervention, but its implementation requires a multidisciplinary approach, with an understanding of its indications and contraindications due to the potential for complications. The management of mechanical ventilation should be part of the curricula during clinical training; however, trainees and practicing professionals frequently report low confidence in managing mechanical ventilation, often seeking additional sources of knowledge. Review articles, consensus statements and clinical practice guidelines have become important sources of guidance in mechanical ventilation, and although clinical practice guidelines offer rigorously developed recommendations, they take a long time to develop and can address only a limited number of clinical questions. The Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira and the Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia sponsored the development of a joint statement addressing all aspects of mechanical ventilation, which was divided into 38 topics. Seventy-five experts from all regions of Brazil worked in pairs to perform scoping reviews, searching for publications on their specific topic of mechanical ventilation in the last 20 years in the highest impact factor journals in the areas of intensive care, pulmonology, and anesthesiology. Each pair produced suggestions and considerations on their topics, which were presented to the entire group in a plenary session for modification when necessary and approval. The result was a comprehensive document encompassing all aspects of mechanical ventilation to provide guidance at the bedside. In this article, we report the methodology used to produce the document and highlight the most important suggestions and considerations of the document, which has been made available to the public in Portuguese.</p>","PeriodicalId":14845,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia","volume":"51 1","pages":"e20240255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11796564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20240255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation can be a life-saving intervention, but its implementation requires a multidisciplinary approach, with an understanding of its indications and contraindications due to the potential for complications. The management of mechanical ventilation should be part of the curricula during clinical training; however, trainees and practicing professionals frequently report low confidence in managing mechanical ventilation, often seeking additional sources of knowledge. Review articles, consensus statements and clinical practice guidelines have become important sources of guidance in mechanical ventilation, and although clinical practice guidelines offer rigorously developed recommendations, they take a long time to develop and can address only a limited number of clinical questions. The Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira and the Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia sponsored the development of a joint statement addressing all aspects of mechanical ventilation, which was divided into 38 topics. Seventy-five experts from all regions of Brazil worked in pairs to perform scoping reviews, searching for publications on their specific topic of mechanical ventilation in the last 20 years in the highest impact factor journals in the areas of intensive care, pulmonology, and anesthesiology. Each pair produced suggestions and considerations on their topics, which were presented to the entire group in a plenary session for modification when necessary and approval. The result was a comprehensive document encompassing all aspects of mechanical ventilation to provide guidance at the bedside. In this article, we report the methodology used to produce the document and highlight the most important suggestions and considerations of the document, which has been made available to the public in Portuguese.

关于机械通气循证实践的联合声明:来自两个巴西医学会的建议。
机械通气可以是一种挽救生命的干预措施,但它的实施需要多学科的方法,由于潜在的并发症,需要了解其适应症和禁忌症。机械通气管理应成为临床培训课程的一部分;然而,受训人员和执业专业人员经常报告对管理机械通气缺乏信心,经常寻求额外的知识来源。综述文章、共识声明和临床实践指南已成为机械通气指导的重要来源,尽管临床实践指南提供了严格制定的建议,但它们需要很长时间才能制定,并且只能解决有限数量的临床问题。巴西密集医学协会和巴西肺科协会赞助制定了一份联合声明,涉及机械通气的所有方面,分为38个主题。来自巴西所有地区的75名专家结对进行了范围审查,在过去20年中在重症监护、肺科和麻醉学领域的影响因子最高的期刊上搜索有关其机械通气特定主题的出版物。每一对都就各自的主题提出了建议和考虑,并在全体会议上提交给整个小组,以便在必要时进行修改和批准。结果是一份全面的文件,涵盖了机械通气的所有方面,为床边提供指导。在本文中,我们报告了编写该文件所使用的方法,并强调了该文件中最重要的建议和考虑,该文件已以葡萄牙语向公众提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
118
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Pulmonology publishes scientific articles that contribute to the improvement of knowledge in the field of the lung diseases and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信