{"title":"Evaluating optimal height for hamstring activity in maximum-speed single-leg bridge test.","authors":"Yuto Sano, Masashi Kawabata, Yuki Sumiya, Yuto Watanabe, Yuto Uchida, Tomoaki Inada, Masaki Murase, Tomonori Kenmoku, Hiroyuki Watanabe, Naonobu Takahira","doi":"10.1055/a-2537-6350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hamstring strain injuries often occur during high-speed movements, yet no functional test reliably induces rapid hamstring contractions. This study aimed to determine the optimal platform height in the maximum-speed single-leg bridge test (MS-SLBT) to maximize hamstring activation. This cross-sectional study included 26 healthy male recreational athletes. Participants performed the MS-SLBT using 20, 40, and 60 cm platforms at maximal speed. The conventional single-leg bridge test (SLBT) was performed on a 60 cm platform at any speed. Measurements included buttock-raising speed; muscle activity of the semitendinosus (ST), biceps femoris (BF), and gluteus maximus (GM) using surface electromyography; and heel-bearing force. MS-SLBT showed significantly faster buttock-raising speeds (0.7-1.0 m/s) than SLBT (0.5 m/s) (p<0.01). ST and BF muscle activities were significantly higher during MS-SLBT on 60 and 40 cm platforms (>90% maximal voluntary isometric contraction) than during SLBT and MS-SLBT on 20 cm platform (p<0.01). GM muscle activity during MS-SLBT was approximately double than that during SLBT(p<0.01). Heel-bearing force was significantly higher during MS-SLBT than during SLBT, MS-SLBT on 40cm platform showing the highest force (p<0.01). MS-SLBT on 40 and 60 platforms required higher hamstring activity, with faster buttock-raising speed and greater heel-bearing force than SLBT and MS-SLBT on 20 platform.</p>","PeriodicalId":14439,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2537-6350","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hamstring strain injuries often occur during high-speed movements, yet no functional test reliably induces rapid hamstring contractions. This study aimed to determine the optimal platform height in the maximum-speed single-leg bridge test (MS-SLBT) to maximize hamstring activation. This cross-sectional study included 26 healthy male recreational athletes. Participants performed the MS-SLBT using 20, 40, and 60 cm platforms at maximal speed. The conventional single-leg bridge test (SLBT) was performed on a 60 cm platform at any speed. Measurements included buttock-raising speed; muscle activity of the semitendinosus (ST), biceps femoris (BF), and gluteus maximus (GM) using surface electromyography; and heel-bearing force. MS-SLBT showed significantly faster buttock-raising speeds (0.7-1.0 m/s) than SLBT (0.5 m/s) (p<0.01). ST and BF muscle activities were significantly higher during MS-SLBT on 60 and 40 cm platforms (>90% maximal voluntary isometric contraction) than during SLBT and MS-SLBT on 20 cm platform (p<0.01). GM muscle activity during MS-SLBT was approximately double than that during SLBT(p<0.01). Heel-bearing force was significantly higher during MS-SLBT than during SLBT, MS-SLBT on 40cm platform showing the highest force (p<0.01). MS-SLBT on 40 and 60 platforms required higher hamstring activity, with faster buttock-raising speed and greater heel-bearing force than SLBT and MS-SLBT on 20 platform.
期刊介绍:
The IJSM provides a forum for the publication of papers dealing with both basic and applied information that advance the field of sports medicine and exercise science, and offer a better understanding of biomedicine. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, short communications, and letters to the Editors.