Virtual reality-based vestibular rehabilitation therapy in patients with acute unilateral vestibulopathy: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1519470
Jae Woo Lee, Chul Young Yoon, Jae Ha Kim, Young Joon Seo, Tae Hoon Kong
{"title":"Virtual reality-based vestibular rehabilitation therapy in patients with acute unilateral vestibulopathy: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jae Woo Lee, Chul Young Yoon, Jae Ha Kim, Young Joon Seo, Tae Hoon Kong","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2025.1519470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Conventional vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) requires significant time and resources, especially for patients with low compliance, limiting its effectiveness and accurate assessment. Studies have shown VRT using virtual reality (VR) to be effective, with meta-analyses confirming its superiority over conventional methods. However, methodological variations in VR remain a limitation. This study aimed to assess the effects of VRT using head-mounted display (HMD) VR technology in patients with acute unilateral vestibulopathy (AUVP) and compare the outcomes with conventional VRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-blinded randomized controlled trial with 60 AUVP patients randomly assigned to VR or control groups. The VR group received VRT via VR, while the control group underwent conventional VRT. Both groups followed individual home-based programs for 8 weeks and visited the clinic every 2 weeks. Subjective dizziness symptoms were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), dizziness handicap inventory (DHI), and Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale. Compliance with home-based programs was assessed on a 0-2-point scale based on responses in a booklet guide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 26 and 27 patients in the VR and control groups, respectively. The mean patient age was 56.91 ± 12.11 years; 22 men and 33 women were included. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance showed significant improvement in both groups for DHI and ABC scores. However, changes in DHI, VAS, and compliance scores did not differ between groups. Improvement in the physical domain of the DHI and ABC scores was significantly faster in the VR group (<i>p</i> = 0.019 for DHI, <i>p</i> = 0.0020 for ABC).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>VRT using VR technology showed comparable efficacy to conventional VRT in AUVP patients. The VR group demonstrated greater improvement in the physical domain of the DHI and ABC scales, indicating enhanced confidence in movement and reduced perception of physical handicap due to dizziness.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1519470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11810741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1519470","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Conventional vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) requires significant time and resources, especially for patients with low compliance, limiting its effectiveness and accurate assessment. Studies have shown VRT using virtual reality (VR) to be effective, with meta-analyses confirming its superiority over conventional methods. However, methodological variations in VR remain a limitation. This study aimed to assess the effects of VRT using head-mounted display (HMD) VR technology in patients with acute unilateral vestibulopathy (AUVP) and compare the outcomes with conventional VRT.

Methods: We conducted a single-blinded randomized controlled trial with 60 AUVP patients randomly assigned to VR or control groups. The VR group received VRT via VR, while the control group underwent conventional VRT. Both groups followed individual home-based programs for 8 weeks and visited the clinic every 2 weeks. Subjective dizziness symptoms were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), dizziness handicap inventory (DHI), and Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale. Compliance with home-based programs was assessed on a 0-2-point scale based on responses in a booklet guide.

Results: Seven patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 26 and 27 patients in the VR and control groups, respectively. The mean patient age was 56.91 ± 12.11 years; 22 men and 33 women were included. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance showed significant improvement in both groups for DHI and ABC scores. However, changes in DHI, VAS, and compliance scores did not differ between groups. Improvement in the physical domain of the DHI and ABC scores was significantly faster in the VR group (p = 0.019 for DHI, p = 0.0020 for ABC).

Discussion: VRT using VR technology showed comparable efficacy to conventional VRT in AUVP patients. The VR group demonstrated greater improvement in the physical domain of the DHI and ABC scales, indicating enhanced confidence in movement and reduced perception of physical handicap due to dizziness.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信