Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma (EMC) of the Breast.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Utsav Joshi, Pravash Budhathoki, Suman Gaire, Sumeet Kumar Yadav, Chengu Niu, Vishakha Agrawal, Soon Khai Low, Hatem Hussein Soliman
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma (EMC) of the Breast.","authors":"Utsav Joshi, Pravash Budhathoki, Suman Gaire, Sumeet Kumar Yadav, Chengu Niu, Vishakha Agrawal, Soon Khai Low, Hatem Hussein Soliman","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2025.01.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most published data on EMC consists of individual case reports, and survival outcomes are not clearly defined to guide evidence-based management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All women with a histologic diagnosis of EMC irrespective of age and stage at diagnosis till 2018 in the National Cancer Database were included (N = 111). Overall survival (OS) was compared among groups using the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age at diagnosis was 67 years, and 101 (88.6%) were over 50 years of age. Ten percent were ER+/Her2-, 29.7% were ER-/Her2-, 0.9% were Her2+, 5.4% were ER+/Her2 unknown, 24% were ER-/Her2 unknown, and 29.7% had no data on ER status. Most patients underwent surgical resection (91.9%), whereas chemotherapy and radiation were utilized in 35.2% and 40.6% of the patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 67.6 months, the 5-year OS was 74.3%. Among patients who received chemotherapy or radiation, the 5-year OS was 80.1% (vs. 68.9% in nonrecipients, P = .02) and 83.1% (vs. 68.5% in nonrecipients, P = .03), respectively. The 5-year OS was 82.7%, 76.5%, and 50% for tumor ≤ 2 cm, 2 to 5 cm, and > 5 cm respectively (P = .009). Chemotherapy or radiation treatment were associated with improved OS in tumors >5 cm (both P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EMC demonstrates distinctive clinicopathologic features and receptor status. Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation demonstrates improved survival in larger tumor (> 5cm) although small sample size and lack of recurrence data limit this conclusion. Studies using larger cohorts are needed to demonstrate objective efficacy of systemic treatment in lymph node positive and metastatic EMC.</p>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.01.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most published data on EMC consists of individual case reports, and survival outcomes are not clearly defined to guide evidence-based management.

Methods: All women with a histologic diagnosis of EMC irrespective of age and stage at diagnosis till 2018 in the National Cancer Database were included (N = 111). Overall survival (OS) was compared among groups using the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods.

Results: The median age at diagnosis was 67 years, and 101 (88.6%) were over 50 years of age. Ten percent were ER+/Her2-, 29.7% were ER-/Her2-, 0.9% were Her2+, 5.4% were ER+/Her2 unknown, 24% were ER-/Her2 unknown, and 29.7% had no data on ER status. Most patients underwent surgical resection (91.9%), whereas chemotherapy and radiation were utilized in 35.2% and 40.6% of the patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 67.6 months, the 5-year OS was 74.3%. Among patients who received chemotherapy or radiation, the 5-year OS was 80.1% (vs. 68.9% in nonrecipients, P = .02) and 83.1% (vs. 68.5% in nonrecipients, P = .03), respectively. The 5-year OS was 82.7%, 76.5%, and 50% for tumor ≤ 2 cm, 2 to 5 cm, and > 5 cm respectively (P = .009). Chemotherapy or radiation treatment were associated with improved OS in tumors >5 cm (both P < .05).

Conclusion: EMC demonstrates distinctive clinicopathologic features and receptor status. Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation demonstrates improved survival in larger tumor (> 5cm) although small sample size and lack of recurrence data limit this conclusion. Studies using larger cohorts are needed to demonstrate objective efficacy of systemic treatment in lymph node positive and metastatic EMC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信