{"title":"[Childhood vaccination: doubts, ambiguities and decision-making in middle-class mothers in Argentina].","authors":"María Jimena Mantilla, Juan Pedro Alonso","doi":"10.1590/0102-311XES010424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, behaviors of rejection or hesitancy towards vaccination and the growth of the so-called \"anti-vax movement\" have been defined as a challenge to Public Health. This articles aims to analyze the decision-making processes of middle-class mothers in the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires, Argentina, in relation to the vaccination of their children, considering factors that trigger behaviors of hesitancy or fear towards vaccination. A total of 35 in-depth interviews were conducted with middle-class mothers in the city of Buenos Aires, identified with \"natural\" or similar to the so-called \"respectful upbringing\" motherhood styles. Different trajectories or paths for vaccine hesitancy or rejection can be traced: (a) previously generated by comments or indications from health professionals during childbirth or pediatric consultations; (b) resulting from more general changes in lifestyles, marked by the option for alternative or \"natural\" healthcare; (c) inserted in processes of criticism and distrust in relation to biomedicine and the affirmation of autonomy in healthcare decisions; and (d) from an active search for information in sources mostly opposed to vaccination. The doubts or ambiguities regarding vaccination presented by these mothers do not unequivocally translate into the rejection of vaccination, but rather into a diversity of practices: vaccination with reservations, selection or postponement of some vaccines and non-vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":9398,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos de saude publica","volume":"41 1","pages":"e00010424"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XES010424","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In recent years, behaviors of rejection or hesitancy towards vaccination and the growth of the so-called "anti-vax movement" have been defined as a challenge to Public Health. This articles aims to analyze the decision-making processes of middle-class mothers in the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires, Argentina, in relation to the vaccination of their children, considering factors that trigger behaviors of hesitancy or fear towards vaccination. A total of 35 in-depth interviews were conducted with middle-class mothers in the city of Buenos Aires, identified with "natural" or similar to the so-called "respectful upbringing" motherhood styles. Different trajectories or paths for vaccine hesitancy or rejection can be traced: (a) previously generated by comments or indications from health professionals during childbirth or pediatric consultations; (b) resulting from more general changes in lifestyles, marked by the option for alternative or "natural" healthcare; (c) inserted in processes of criticism and distrust in relation to biomedicine and the affirmation of autonomy in healthcare decisions; and (d) from an active search for information in sources mostly opposed to vaccination. The doubts or ambiguities regarding vaccination presented by these mothers do not unequivocally translate into the rejection of vaccination, but rather into a diversity of practices: vaccination with reservations, selection or postponement of some vaccines and non-vaccination.
期刊介绍:
Cadernos de Saúde Pública/Reports in Public Health (CSP) is a monthly journal published by the Sergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ).
The journal is devoted to the publication of scientific articles focusing on the production of knowledge in Public Health. CSP also aims to foster critical reflection and debate on current themes related to public policies and factors that impact populations'' living conditions and health care.
All articles submitted to CSP are judiciously evaluated by the Editorial Board, composed of the Editors-in-Chief and Associate Editors, respecting the diversity of approaches, objects, and methods of the different disciplines characterizing the field of Public Health. Originality, relevance, and methodological rigor are the principal characteristics considered in the editorial evaluation. The article evaluation system practiced by CSP consists of two stages.