[Childhood vaccination: doubts, ambiguities and decision-making in middle-class mothers in Argentina].

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Cadernos de saude publica Pub Date : 2025-02-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0102-311XES010424
María Jimena Mantilla, Juan Pedro Alonso
{"title":"[Childhood vaccination: doubts, ambiguities and decision-making in middle-class mothers in Argentina].","authors":"María Jimena Mantilla, Juan Pedro Alonso","doi":"10.1590/0102-311XES010424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, behaviors of rejection or hesitancy towards vaccination and the growth of the so-called \"anti-vax movement\" have been defined as a challenge to Public Health. This articles aims to analyze the decision-making processes of middle-class mothers in the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires, Argentina, in relation to the vaccination of their children, considering factors that trigger behaviors of hesitancy or fear towards vaccination. A total of 35 in-depth interviews were conducted with middle-class mothers in the city of Buenos Aires, identified with \"natural\" or similar to the so-called \"respectful upbringing\" motherhood styles. Different trajectories or paths for vaccine hesitancy or rejection can be traced: (a) previously generated by comments or indications from health professionals during childbirth or pediatric consultations; (b) resulting from more general changes in lifestyles, marked by the option for alternative or \"natural\" healthcare; (c) inserted in processes of criticism and distrust in relation to biomedicine and the affirmation of autonomy in healthcare decisions; and (d) from an active search for information in sources mostly opposed to vaccination. The doubts or ambiguities regarding vaccination presented by these mothers do not unequivocally translate into the rejection of vaccination, but rather into a diversity of practices: vaccination with reservations, selection or postponement of some vaccines and non-vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":9398,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos de saude publica","volume":"41 1","pages":"e00010424"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XES010424","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, behaviors of rejection or hesitancy towards vaccination and the growth of the so-called "anti-vax movement" have been defined as a challenge to Public Health. This articles aims to analyze the decision-making processes of middle-class mothers in the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires, Argentina, in relation to the vaccination of their children, considering factors that trigger behaviors of hesitancy or fear towards vaccination. A total of 35 in-depth interviews were conducted with middle-class mothers in the city of Buenos Aires, identified with "natural" or similar to the so-called "respectful upbringing" motherhood styles. Different trajectories or paths for vaccine hesitancy or rejection can be traced: (a) previously generated by comments or indications from health professionals during childbirth or pediatric consultations; (b) resulting from more general changes in lifestyles, marked by the option for alternative or "natural" healthcare; (c) inserted in processes of criticism and distrust in relation to biomedicine and the affirmation of autonomy in healthcare decisions; and (d) from an active search for information in sources mostly opposed to vaccination. The doubts or ambiguities regarding vaccination presented by these mothers do not unequivocally translate into the rejection of vaccination, but rather into a diversity of practices: vaccination with reservations, selection or postponement of some vaccines and non-vaccination.

[儿童疫苗接种:阿根廷中产阶级母亲的疑虑、模糊和决策]。
近年来,对疫苗接种的拒绝或犹豫行为以及所谓的“反疫苗运动”的增长已被定义为对公共卫生的挑战。本文旨在分析阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯大都市区中产阶级母亲在孩子接种疫苗方面的决策过程,考虑引发对疫苗接种犹豫不决或恐惧行为的因素。研究人员对布宜诺斯艾利斯的中产阶级母亲进行了35次深度访谈,这些母亲被认为是“自然的”或类似于所谓的“尊重教养”的母亲风格。可追溯疫苗犹豫或排斥的不同轨迹或途径:(a)以前由分娩或儿科咨询期间卫生专业人员的意见或指示产生;(b)由于生活方式的更普遍改变,以选择替代性或“自然”保健为标志;(c)插入与生物医学有关的批评和不信任过程,并肯定医疗保健决定的自主权;(d)从主要反对接种疫苗的来源中积极搜索信息。这些母亲对疫苗接种的怀疑或含糊不清并没有明确地转化为拒绝接种疫苗,而是转化为多种做法:保留接种疫苗,选择或推迟某些疫苗和不接种疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cadernos de saude publica
Cadernos de saude publica 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
356
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Cadernos de Saúde Pública/Reports in Public Health (CSP) is a monthly journal published by the Sergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ). The journal is devoted to the publication of scientific articles focusing on the production of knowledge in Public Health. CSP also aims to foster critical reflection and debate on current themes related to public policies and factors that impact populations'' living conditions and health care. All articles submitted to CSP are judiciously evaluated by the Editorial Board, composed of the Editors-in-Chief and Associate Editors, respecting the diversity of approaches, objects, and methods of the different disciplines characterizing the field of Public Health. Originality, relevance, and methodological rigor are the principal characteristics considered in the editorial evaluation. The article evaluation system practiced by CSP consists of two stages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信