Efficacy of curative radiotherapy for the treatment of elderly patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Masakuni Sakaguchi, Toshiya Maebayashi, Yuta Sekino, Hitoshi Ishikawa
{"title":"Efficacy of curative radiotherapy for the treatment of elderly patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review.","authors":"Masakuni Sakaguchi, Toshiya Maebayashi, Yuta Sekino, Hitoshi Ishikawa","doi":"10.1186/s12894-025-01707-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years, a chemoradiotherapy has been developed as a radical treatment for stage II-III muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) that can preserve the bladder for patients who cannot tolerate radical cystectomy (RC) or who do not wish to undergo RC. However, most of the studies were conducted on younger patients with MIBC, and it is not clear if it is effective for elderly patients with MIBC. In this study, we reviewed the effects and adverse events after radical radiotherapy in elderly patients with MIBC to determine if radiotherapy has been/can be equally recommended for younger patients with MIBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted full research reports in English comparing treatment results between different age groups and reports targeting elderly patients with MIBC. A keyword search of the PubMed database was conducted in the decade ending on December 8, 2021. Studies reporting post-treatment overall survival (OS), relapse-free/progression-free/disease-free survival (RFS/PFS/DFS), disease-specific/cancer-specific survival (DSS/CSS), and complete response (CR) rate, adverse events (AEs), and quality of life (QOL) in elderly patients with MIBC were searched. Thirty-nine full articles, including those with comparisons by age group or treatments for elderly patients, were retrieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OS was significant or tended to be poor in elderly patients. There were no differences in PFS and CSS between younger and elderly patients. No differences in the rates of grade 3 morbidities between younger and elderly patients were also observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lack of a difference in PFS/CSS and toxicities between elderly and younger MIBC patients indicated that curative chemoradiotherapy is effective for not only younger but also elderly patients. With advances in treatment, further prospective studies are needed to optimize the management of MIBC in elderly patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"25 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01707-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, a chemoradiotherapy has been developed as a radical treatment for stage II-III muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) that can preserve the bladder for patients who cannot tolerate radical cystectomy (RC) or who do not wish to undergo RC. However, most of the studies were conducted on younger patients with MIBC, and it is not clear if it is effective for elderly patients with MIBC. In this study, we reviewed the effects and adverse events after radical radiotherapy in elderly patients with MIBC to determine if radiotherapy has been/can be equally recommended for younger patients with MIBC.

Methods: We extracted full research reports in English comparing treatment results between different age groups and reports targeting elderly patients with MIBC. A keyword search of the PubMed database was conducted in the decade ending on December 8, 2021. Studies reporting post-treatment overall survival (OS), relapse-free/progression-free/disease-free survival (RFS/PFS/DFS), disease-specific/cancer-specific survival (DSS/CSS), and complete response (CR) rate, adverse events (AEs), and quality of life (QOL) in elderly patients with MIBC were searched. Thirty-nine full articles, including those with comparisons by age group or treatments for elderly patients, were retrieved.

Results: OS was significant or tended to be poor in elderly patients. There were no differences in PFS and CSS between younger and elderly patients. No differences in the rates of grade 3 morbidities between younger and elderly patients were also observed.

Conclusion: The lack of a difference in PFS/CSS and toxicities between elderly and younger MIBC patients indicated that curative chemoradiotherapy is effective for not only younger but also elderly patients. With advances in treatment, further prospective studies are needed to optimize the management of MIBC in elderly patients.

治疗老年肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者的根治性放疗疗效:系统性综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信