Principles of radiological protection and application of ALARA, ALADA, and ALADAIP: a critical review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2025-02-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.014
Rafael Pereira de Mendonça, Carlos Estrela, Mike Reis Bueno, Teresa Cristina Alves Silva Gonzalez Carvalho, Lucas Rodrigues de Araújo Estrela, Israel Chilvarquer
{"title":"Principles of radiological protection and application of ALARA, ALADA, and ALADAIP: a critical review.","authors":"Rafael Pereira de Mendonça, Carlos Estrela, Mike Reis Bueno, Teresa Cristina Alves Silva Gonzalez Carvalho, Lucas Rodrigues de Araújo Estrela, Israel Chilvarquer","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study carried out a critical review of the principles of radioprotection, including the ALARA, ALADA, and ALADAIP principles. The Google Scholar and PubMed databases were the search resources, and the following keywords were searched: Linear No-Threshold (LNT); Biologic Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR VII); As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA); As Low As Diagnostically Acceptable (ALADA); As Low As Diagnostically Acceptable, being Indication-oriented and Patient-specific (ALADAIP). This critical review included studies with historical references, reviews, position papers, and clinical and experimental studies. Regarding data extraction, only original articles were selected after the screening process. Much of the current evolution of X-ray machines and radioprotection protocols has stemmed from legitimate concerns about this topic. This development has grown out of the relevant work of organizations like ICRP, UNSCEAR, and other renowned international organizations. Low doses of radiation, such as those used for diagnosis, also occur naturally and are present in everyday life. Although there is no agreement on the actual risk involving low doses, the recommendations of ALARA, ALADA, and ALADAIP prevail, in line with the trend to uphold principles that balance the importance of X-ray diagnostic imaging with the intention of keeping the doses as low as possible. The benefits of X-ray exams, when justified, tend to outweigh the low risks attributed to them.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":"39 ","pages":"e14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study carried out a critical review of the principles of radioprotection, including the ALARA, ALADA, and ALADAIP principles. The Google Scholar and PubMed databases were the search resources, and the following keywords were searched: Linear No-Threshold (LNT); Biologic Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR VII); As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA); As Low As Diagnostically Acceptable (ALADA); As Low As Diagnostically Acceptable, being Indication-oriented and Patient-specific (ALADAIP). This critical review included studies with historical references, reviews, position papers, and clinical and experimental studies. Regarding data extraction, only original articles were selected after the screening process. Much of the current evolution of X-ray machines and radioprotection protocols has stemmed from legitimate concerns about this topic. This development has grown out of the relevant work of organizations like ICRP, UNSCEAR, and other renowned international organizations. Low doses of radiation, such as those used for diagnosis, also occur naturally and are present in everyday life. Although there is no agreement on the actual risk involving low doses, the recommendations of ALARA, ALADA, and ALADAIP prevail, in line with the trend to uphold principles that balance the importance of X-ray diagnostic imaging with the intention of keeping the doses as low as possible. The benefits of X-ray exams, when justified, tend to outweigh the low risks attributed to them.

ALARA、ALADA和ALADAIP放射防护原理及应用综述。
本研究对辐射防护原则进行了批判性审查,包括ALARA、ALADA和ALADAIP原则。检索资源为谷歌Scholar和PubMed数据库,检索关键词为:线性无阈值(Linear No-Threshold, LNT);电离辐射的生物效应(BEIR VII)最低合理可达(ALARA);最低诊断可接受(ALADA);低至诊断上可接受,适应证导向和患者特异性(ALADAIP)。这篇批判性的综述包括历史参考文献、综述、立场论文以及临床和实验研究。在数据提取方面,经过筛选,只选取原创文章。目前x光机和辐射防护协议的许多演变都源于对这一主题的合理担忧。这一发展是ICRP、UNSCEAR等组织和其他著名国际组织的相关工作的结果。低剂量的辐射,如用于诊断的辐射,也会自然产生,并存在于日常生活中。虽然对低剂量的实际风险没有一致意见,但ALARA、ALADA和ALADAIP的建议占主导地位,这符合维护x射线诊断成像重要性与保持尽可能低剂量意图之间平衡的原则的趋势。x光检查的好处,在合理的情况下,往往超过了它的低风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信