Eran Yerushalmi, Tal Abu, David Hasdai, Yaron Aviv, Ran Kornowski, Keren Skalsky
{"title":"The Prognostic Significance of Coronary Artery Disease Interventions in Lung Transplant Candidates.","authors":"Eran Yerushalmi, Tal Abu, David Hasdai, Yaron Aviv, Ran Kornowski, Keren Skalsky","doi":"10.1159/000543400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung transplantation (LT) is a lifesaving procedure in patients with end stage lung failure. The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with lung disease is comparably high, and coronary angiography is widely used for coronary anatomy assessment prior to LT. Detection of significant CAD usually results in revascularization to minimize posttransplant cardiovascular events. We aim to examine the prognostic significance of CAD interventions on LT candidates pre- and post-LT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a retrospective registry of 450 LT candidates undergoing cardiac catheterization during 2014-2019, patients were assessed for the presence of significant CAD and percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome was defined as occurrence of major advance cardiac events (MACE) in LT candidates while on the waiting list. MACE comprising of cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of MACE posttransplant according to the coronary intervention status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MACE was recorded in 22 LT candidates, with a higher incidence in the intervention group compared to the nonintervention group (8.3% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.007). 28.6% of MACE events in the intervention group occurred in the first month after intervention. Cardiovascular mortality accounted for 8.6% of all deaths, without significant difference between the intervention and nonintervention group (16.0% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.155). The rates of MACE post-LT were mildly and nonsignificantly increased in the intervention group compared to the nonintervention group (11.1% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-LT routine coronary intervention does not necessarily protect patients from experiencing MACE while on the waiting list or post-LT.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543400","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Lung transplantation (LT) is a lifesaving procedure in patients with end stage lung failure. The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with lung disease is comparably high, and coronary angiography is widely used for coronary anatomy assessment prior to LT. Detection of significant CAD usually results in revascularization to minimize posttransplant cardiovascular events. We aim to examine the prognostic significance of CAD interventions on LT candidates pre- and post-LT.
Methods: From a retrospective registry of 450 LT candidates undergoing cardiac catheterization during 2014-2019, patients were assessed for the presence of significant CAD and percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome was defined as occurrence of major advance cardiac events (MACE) in LT candidates while on the waiting list. MACE comprising of cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of MACE posttransplant according to the coronary intervention status.
Results: MACE was recorded in 22 LT candidates, with a higher incidence in the intervention group compared to the nonintervention group (8.3% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.007). 28.6% of MACE events in the intervention group occurred in the first month after intervention. Cardiovascular mortality accounted for 8.6% of all deaths, without significant difference between the intervention and nonintervention group (16.0% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.155). The rates of MACE post-LT were mildly and nonsignificantly increased in the intervention group compared to the nonintervention group (11.1% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.18).
Conclusion: Pre-LT routine coronary intervention does not necessarily protect patients from experiencing MACE while on the waiting list or post-LT.
期刊介绍:
''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.