Gender differences in circumstances associated with cannabis use

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Erin L. Martin PhD, Nathaniel L. Baker MS, Viswanathan Ramakrishnan PhD, Brian Neelon PhD, Michael E. Saladin PhD, Aimee L. McRae-Clark PharmD
{"title":"Gender differences in circumstances associated with cannabis use","authors":"Erin L. Martin PhD,&nbsp;Nathaniel L. Baker MS,&nbsp;Viswanathan Ramakrishnan PhD,&nbsp;Brian Neelon PhD,&nbsp;Michael E. Saladin PhD,&nbsp;Aimee L. McRae-Clark PharmD","doi":"10.1111/ajad.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Identifying circumstances associated with cannabis use is critical to the development of effective interventions for cannabis use disorder (CUD) and circumstances may differ by gender. The Inventory of Drug Taking Situations (IDTS) assesses the types of situations in which individuals most often use drugs through eight subscales: dealing with (1) Unpleasant Emotions; (2) Physical Discomfort; (3) Pleasant Emotions; (4) Testing Personal Control; (5) Urges/Temptations; (6) Conflict with Others; (7) Social Pressure; and (8) Pleasant Times with Others. The aims of this study were to determine if IDTS scores varied by gender in individuals with CUD, and to ascertain if behavioral factors such as cannabis use or stress were differentially associated with IDTS scores by gender.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Baseline data were obtained from a study of 148 nontreatment-seeking individuals with CUD. Data included demographic characteristics, IDTS scores, self-reported past 90-day substance use, and measures of past-month and childhood stress.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Women reported using cannabis more than men in negative affective contexts, namely when experiencing conflict with others, testing personal control, physical discomfort, and unpleasant emotions. IDTS subscale scores associated with negative affect and pleasant emotions were positively associated with past 90-day cannabis use sessions across genders, use when experiencing negative affect was associated with childhood stress across genders, and use when experiencing unpleasant emotions was differentially associated with recent stress by gender.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion and Scientific Significance</h3>\n \n <p>Findings suggest gender differences in circumstances associated with cannabis use with implications for therapeutic development for CUD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":"34 3","pages":"342-349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal on Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajad.70000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Identifying circumstances associated with cannabis use is critical to the development of effective interventions for cannabis use disorder (CUD) and circumstances may differ by gender. The Inventory of Drug Taking Situations (IDTS) assesses the types of situations in which individuals most often use drugs through eight subscales: dealing with (1) Unpleasant Emotions; (2) Physical Discomfort; (3) Pleasant Emotions; (4) Testing Personal Control; (5) Urges/Temptations; (6) Conflict with Others; (7) Social Pressure; and (8) Pleasant Times with Others. The aims of this study were to determine if IDTS scores varied by gender in individuals with CUD, and to ascertain if behavioral factors such as cannabis use or stress were differentially associated with IDTS scores by gender.

Methods

Baseline data were obtained from a study of 148 nontreatment-seeking individuals with CUD. Data included demographic characteristics, IDTS scores, self-reported past 90-day substance use, and measures of past-month and childhood stress.

Results

Women reported using cannabis more than men in negative affective contexts, namely when experiencing conflict with others, testing personal control, physical discomfort, and unpleasant emotions. IDTS subscale scores associated with negative affect and pleasant emotions were positively associated with past 90-day cannabis use sessions across genders, use when experiencing negative affect was associated with childhood stress across genders, and use when experiencing unpleasant emotions was differentially associated with recent stress by gender.

Conclusion and Scientific Significance

Findings suggest gender differences in circumstances associated with cannabis use with implications for therapeutic development for CUD.

与吸食大麻有关的环境中的性别差异。
背景和目标:确定与大麻使用有关的情况对于制定有效的大麻使用障碍干预措施至关重要,情况可能因性别而异。药物使用情境量表(IDTS)通过8个分量表评估个体最常使用药物的情境类型:处理(1)不愉快情绪;(2)身体不适;(3)愉悦的情绪;(4)测试个人控制能力;(5)敦促/诱惑;(6)与他人发生冲突;(7)社会压力;(8)与他人共度美好时光。本研究的目的是确定CUD患者的IDTS评分是否因性别而异,并确定大麻使用或压力等行为因素是否与性别的IDTS评分存在差异。方法:基线数据来自148名未寻求治疗的CUD患者的研究。数据包括人口统计特征、IDTS评分、自我报告的过去90天药物使用情况,以及过去一个月和童年压力的测量。结果:女性报告在负面情感环境下使用大麻的次数多于男性,即在与他人发生冲突、测试个人控制能力、身体不适和不愉快情绪时。与消极情绪和愉快情绪相关的IDTS子量表得分与性别间过去90天的大麻使用次数呈正相关,经历消极情绪时的使用与性别间的童年压力相关,经历不愉快情绪时的使用与性别间的近期压力存在差异。结论和科学意义:研究结果表明,在与大麻使用有关的情况下,性别差异对CUD的治疗发展有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The American Journal on Addictions is the official journal of the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry. The Academy encourages research on the etiology, prevention, identification, and treatment of substance abuse; thus, the journal provides a forum for the dissemination of information in the extensive field of addiction. Each issue of this publication covers a wide variety of topics ranging from codependence to genetics, epidemiology to dual diagnostics, etiology to neuroscience, and much more. Features of the journal, all written by experts in the field, include special overview articles, clinical or basic research papers, clinical updates, and book reviews within the area of addictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信