An innovative approach to emulsifier use in broiler feed affects nutrient digestion and growth performance in young broilers.

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
D Michels, S H E Verkempinck, K Vermeulen, R Spaepen, E Burton, D Scholey, A L Wealleans, T Grauwet
{"title":"An innovative approach to emulsifier use in broiler feed affects nutrient digestion and growth performance in young broilers.","authors":"D Michels, S H E Verkempinck, K Vermeulen, R Spaepen, E Burton, D Scholey, A L Wealleans, T Grauwet","doi":"10.1080/00071668.2024.2440874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>1. This study evaluated the effect of oil-in-water (o/w) emulsion supplementation in feed compared to a conventional oil and emulsifier combination on fat and protein digestibility and growth performance in broiler chickens. The effects of this supplementation on macronutrient digestion kinetics were investigated through simulated <i>in vitro</i> digestion based on the broiler gastrointestinal tract.2. A total of 450 one-d-old Ross 308 chickens were assigned to one of the five dietary treatments consisting of nine replicates of 10 broilers each. The treatments included a control diet containing oil (3.25%) without emulsifiers, (NON-EM Low) or with a low emulsifier inclusion (0.10%), an EM Low diet supplemented with o/w emulsion using a low emulsifier concentration (3.25% oil; 0.10% emulsifier), a NON-EM High diet supplemented with oil (3.25%) and a emulsifier at high inclusion (0.65%) or a EM High diet supplemented with o/w emulsion using emulsifier at high inclusion (3.25% oil; 0.65% emulsifier). The feeding trial lasted 21 d using growing broilers.3. Body weight gain was higher in o/w emulsion diets EM Low and High compared to the other three diets. Fat digestibility at 21 d of age was not significantly different, although protein digestibility was lower in birds fed EM Low and EM High diets.4. <i>In vitro</i> digestion was substantially different in lipolysis, protein and starch hydrolysis kinetics. O/w emulsion supplementation reduced lag times in lipolysis and starch digestibility, and adding emulsifier altered the overall protein and lipid digestion kinetic behaviour.5. In conclusion, this study showed that o/w emulsion supplementation significantly improved broiler performance, most likely caused by differences in nutrient digestion kinetics in the starter phase. This research showed the potential of <i>in vitro</i> simulation to complement <i>in vivo</i> trials to understand digestion kinetics or to perform screening of potential diets before performing <i>in vivo</i> trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":9322,"journal":{"name":"British Poultry Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Poultry Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2024.2440874","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1. This study evaluated the effect of oil-in-water (o/w) emulsion supplementation in feed compared to a conventional oil and emulsifier combination on fat and protein digestibility and growth performance in broiler chickens. The effects of this supplementation on macronutrient digestion kinetics were investigated through simulated in vitro digestion based on the broiler gastrointestinal tract.2. A total of 450 one-d-old Ross 308 chickens were assigned to one of the five dietary treatments consisting of nine replicates of 10 broilers each. The treatments included a control diet containing oil (3.25%) without emulsifiers, (NON-EM Low) or with a low emulsifier inclusion (0.10%), an EM Low diet supplemented with o/w emulsion using a low emulsifier concentration (3.25% oil; 0.10% emulsifier), a NON-EM High diet supplemented with oil (3.25%) and a emulsifier at high inclusion (0.65%) or a EM High diet supplemented with o/w emulsion using emulsifier at high inclusion (3.25% oil; 0.65% emulsifier). The feeding trial lasted 21 d using growing broilers.3. Body weight gain was higher in o/w emulsion diets EM Low and High compared to the other three diets. Fat digestibility at 21 d of age was not significantly different, although protein digestibility was lower in birds fed EM Low and EM High diets.4. In vitro digestion was substantially different in lipolysis, protein and starch hydrolysis kinetics. O/w emulsion supplementation reduced lag times in lipolysis and starch digestibility, and adding emulsifier altered the overall protein and lipid digestion kinetic behaviour.5. In conclusion, this study showed that o/w emulsion supplementation significantly improved broiler performance, most likely caused by differences in nutrient digestion kinetics in the starter phase. This research showed the potential of in vitro simulation to complement in vivo trials to understand digestion kinetics or to perform screening of potential diets before performing in vivo trials.

在肉鸡饲料中使用乳化剂的创新方法会影响幼雏肉鸡的营养消化和生长性能。
1. 本试验旨在评价在饲料中添加水包油(o/w)乳化剂对肉鸡脂肪和蛋白质消化率及生长性能的影响,并与常规油乳化剂组合进行比较。通过模拟肉仔鸡胃肠道体外消化试验,研究添加该添加剂对肉仔鸡宏量营养素消化动力学的影响。选取450只1日龄罗斯308肉鸡,每组5个饲粮处理,每组9个重复,每个重复10只鸡。对照组饲粮中添加不含乳化剂的油(3.25%)(NON-EM Low)或低乳化剂添加量(0.10%),EM Low饲粮中添加低乳化剂浓度(3.25%油;0.10%乳化剂)、NON-EM High饲粮中添加油(3.25%)和高包合乳化剂(0.65%)或EM High饲粮中添加0 /w乳化剂,使用高包合乳化剂(3.25%油;乳化剂0.65%)。饲养试验以生长肉鸡为对象,试验期21 d。与其他3种饲粮相比,0 /w乳剂饲粮EM低和EM高的体重增加更高。21日龄脂肪消化率差异不显著,但蛋白质消化率较EM低和EM高饲粮低。体外消化在脂解、蛋白质和淀粉水解动力学方面有很大不同。添加0 /w乳化剂减少了脂肪分解和淀粉消化的滞后时间,并改变了整体蛋白质和脂肪消化的动力学行为。综上所述,饲粮中添加0 /w乳化液显著提高了肉鸡生产性能,这很可能是由于发酵期营养物质消化动力学的差异造成的。这项研究表明,体外模拟有可能补充体内试验,以了解消化动力学或在进行体内试验之前筛选潜在的饮食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Poultry Science
British Poultry Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: From its first volume in 1960, British Poultry Science has been a leading international journal for poultry scientists and advisers to the poultry industry throughout the world. Over 60% of the independently refereed papers published originate outside the UK. Most typically they report the results of biological studies with an experimental approach which either make an original contribution to fundamental science or are of obvious application to the industry. Subjects which are covered include: anatomy, embryology, biochemistry, biophysics, physiology, reproduction and genetics, behaviour, microbiology, endocrinology, nutrition, environmental science, food science, feeding stuffs and feeding, management and housing welfare, breeding, hatching, poultry meat and egg yields and quality.Papers that adopt a modelling approach or describe the scientific background to new equipment or apparatus directly relevant to the industry are also published. The journal also features rapid publication of Short Communications. Summaries of papers presented at the Spring Meeting of the UK Branch of the WPSA are published in British Poultry Abstracts .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信