Evaluating the Real-World Effectiveness of Systemic Treatments in Atopic Dermatitis Using the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT): A Multi-Centre, Prospective Study.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Hyun Ji Lee, Yuri Woo, Young Bok Lee, Ji Hye Lee, Jung Eun Kim, Ji Hyun Lee, Sang Hyun Cho
{"title":"Evaluating the Real-World Effectiveness of Systemic Treatments in Atopic Dermatitis Using the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT): A Multi-Centre, Prospective Study.","authors":"Hyun Ji Lee, Yuri Woo, Young Bok Lee, Ji Hye Lee, Jung Eun Kim, Ji Hyun Lee, Sang Hyun Cho","doi":"10.2340/actadv.v105.40704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atopic dermatitis is a chronic skin disease affecting quality of life, sleep, and mental health. Traditional evaluation methods focus on clinical assessments, but there is a growing need for tools that incorporate patient-reported outcomes (PROs). To evaluate the effectiveness of the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) in assessing disease severity in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis and to compare the efficacy of systemic immunosuppressants and dupilumab in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. A prospective, observational study was conducted across seven centres in Korea, involving 112 patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. The ADCT, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were used for assessing atopic dermatitis severity. In addition, the study assessed the effectiveness of immunosuppressants and dupilumab over the course of one year. The study found significant correlations between ADCT scores and other severity measures (EASI, DLQI). The correlation coefficients were 0.54 (p < 0.0001) for ADCT vs EASI and 0.83 (p < 0.0001) for ADCT vs DLQI. Furthermore, patients treated with dupilumab exhibited greater improvement compared with those on cyclosporine, as measured by the ADCT (adjusted OR [95% CI]); 6.98 [2.49, 19.58]). The ADCT effectively captures subjective aspects compared with the EASI and can be used practically and effectively in clinical settings of atopic dermatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":6944,"journal":{"name":"Acta dermato-venereologica","volume":"105 ","pages":"adv40704"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta dermato-venereologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v105.40704","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic skin disease affecting quality of life, sleep, and mental health. Traditional evaluation methods focus on clinical assessments, but there is a growing need for tools that incorporate patient-reported outcomes (PROs). To evaluate the effectiveness of the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) in assessing disease severity in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis and to compare the efficacy of systemic immunosuppressants and dupilumab in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. A prospective, observational study was conducted across seven centres in Korea, involving 112 patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. The ADCT, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were used for assessing atopic dermatitis severity. In addition, the study assessed the effectiveness of immunosuppressants and dupilumab over the course of one year. The study found significant correlations between ADCT scores and other severity measures (EASI, DLQI). The correlation coefficients were 0.54 (p < 0.0001) for ADCT vs EASI and 0.83 (p < 0.0001) for ADCT vs DLQI. Furthermore, patients treated with dupilumab exhibited greater improvement compared with those on cyclosporine, as measured by the ADCT (adjusted OR [95% CI]); 6.98 [2.49, 19.58]). The ADCT effectively captures subjective aspects compared with the EASI and can be used practically and effectively in clinical settings of atopic dermatitis.

使用特应性皮炎控制工具(ADCT)评估系统治疗特应性皮炎的实际效果:一项多中心、前瞻性研究。
特应性皮炎是一种影响生活质量、睡眠和心理健康的慢性皮肤病。传统的评估方法侧重于临床评估,但越来越需要纳入患者报告结果(PROs)的工具。评估特应性皮炎控制工具(ADCT)在评估中度至重度特应性皮炎患者疾病严重程度方面的有效性,并比较全身免疫抑制剂和杜匹单抗在中度至重度特应性皮炎患者中的疗效。在韩国的7个中心进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究,涉及112名中度至重度特应性皮炎患者。采用ADCT、湿疹面积及严重程度指数(EASI)和皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)评估特应性皮炎的严重程度。此外,该研究在一年的时间里评估了免疫抑制剂和杜匹单抗的有效性。研究发现,ADCT评分与其他严重程度测量(EASI, DLQI)之间存在显著相关性。相关系数为0.54 (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta dermato-venereologica
Acta dermato-venereologica 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Dermato-Venereologica publishes high-quality manuscripts in English in the field of Dermatology and Venereology, dealing with new observations on basic dermatological and venereological research, as well as clinical investigations. Each volume also features a number of Review articles in special areas, as well as short Letters to the Editor to stimulate debate and to disseminate important clinical observations. Acta Dermato-Venereologica has rapid publication times and is amply illustrated with a large number of colour photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信