Redefining DNA cleavage in type I CRISPR systems with the HNH domain

IF 10.7 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
MedComm Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1002/mco2.70060
Senfeng Zhang, Yao Liu, Chunyi Hu
{"title":"Redefining DNA cleavage in type I CRISPR systems with the HNH domain","authors":"Senfeng Zhang,&nbsp;Yao Liu,&nbsp;Chunyi Hu","doi":"10.1002/mco2.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two recent cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) studies have captured the HNH domain's ability to replace Cas3 within the Cascade complex (CRISPR-associated complex for antiviral defense) in both type I-E and type I-F CRISPR-Cas systems.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> These findings reveal that Cas3 is not required and the HNH domain forms a ring-like structure with Cascade, enabling precise DNA cleavage and providing a new avenue for understanding bacterial CRISPR-Cas immune responses.</p><p>CRISPR-Cas systems, which stand for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats and CRISPR-associated genes, are adaptive immunity mechanisms in bacteria and archaea, designed responsible for protecting against viral invasion. The immune response typically involves three stages: adaptation, expression, and interference. Based on the Cas effectors used during CRISPR interference, these systems are categorized into two classes and seven types. Class 1, including types I, III, IV, and VII, comprises multi-subunit Cas protein effector complexes, whereas Class 2, which includes types II, V, and VI, is composed of single-subunit Cas protein effectors.<span><sup>3, 4</sup></span></p><p>In canonical type I systems, multiple Cas proteins assemble into a crRNA-containing Cascade complex, which stands for CRISPR-associated complex for antiviral defense, with the exclusion of Cas3. When the target DNA is recognized and full R-loop formation, Cas 3 is recruited as the catalytic module responsible for mediating target DNA cleavage.<span><sup>5</sup></span> However, recent studies have identified two novel variant type I systems. In one variant, the type I-E system, the C-terminus of Cas5 is fused with an HNH domain, and in another variant, the type I-F system, the HNH domain is inserted into the C-terminus of Cas8 (Figure 1A). Despite lacking the Cas3 nuclease, the HNH-Cascade can still cleave target DNA. This is especially intriguing, as in type II CRISPR-Cas systems, the HNH nuclease domain is responsible for cleaving the DNA target strand in Cas9. Consequently, understanding the processes behind PAM recognition, crRNA guidance, and precise DNA cleavage in HNH-mediated immunity within type I-E and type I-F systems has emerged as a critical area of research.</p><p>The two papers published by Hirano et al. and Zhang et al. report cryo-EM studies in the 3.0–3.48 Å range, capturing distinct states of the target-free HNH-Cascade and target-bound HNH-Cascade complexes in the type I-F (<i>Selenomonas sp</i>) and type I-E (<i>Candidatus Cloacimonetes</i>) systems, respectively. These studies reveal that both the type I-F HNH-Cascade complex and the type I-E HNH-Cascade complex adopt a ring-like architecture that provides a clear view of how these systems achieve precise DNA cleavage (Figure 1B).</p><p>In the type I-F HNH-Cascade complex, the structure is organized into head, backbone, and tail regions, resembling the subunit arrangement of type I-F Cascade complexes in <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (PaCascade). The Cas8-HNH domain replaces the Cas8-HB domain (the C-terminal helical bundle, equivalent to Cas11) and is positioned between the head and tail sections. Within the tail region, the Cas5-Cas8 heterodimer binds the crRNA's 5′-handle region along with the PAM-containing DNA duplex, while the head of Cascade is mainly composed of Cas6 and the crRNA's 3′-handle. Upon binding of the target DNA with crRNA, complete R-loop formation shifts the Cascade head outward, enabling Cas8-HNH to detach, rotate, and align for target DNA cleavage. Thus, Cas8 plays dual roles in PAM recognition and target cleavage in the type I-F HNH-Cascade system (Figure 1C). In contrast, the type I-E HNH-Cascade complex showcases the Cas5-HNH domain integrating into the “inner belly” of the complex, sandwiched and stabilized by Cas6 and Cas11, with the catalytic cleft facing towards Cas11 and against Cas6. The binding of target DNA and the formation of the full R-loop drive the movement of the crRNA 3′-handle, Cas6, and the Cas5-HNH domain together, widening the substrate channel formed by Cas5-HNH and Cas11, where it plays a pivotal role in DNA cleavage (Figure 1B).</p><p>In brief, the HNH endonuclease domain substitutes for the Cas3 helicase-nuclease, which is usually present in standard type I CRISPR-Cas systems. This research underscores the crucial role of crRNA-guided positioning in targeting DNA and reveals how the HNH domain enables precise DNA cleavage by facilitating target DNA exposure and cutting. Together with the Cascade scaffold, the HNH domain creates a positively charged groove that stabilizes the R-loop and ensures accurate, sequential nicking of both DNA strands.</p><p>These findings open further exploration into the adaptability and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Future research could focus on uncovering the evolutionary processes that incorporated the HNH domain into these immune systems, shedding light on their dynamic adaptability. Additionally, studying other CRISPR-Cas subtypes may reveal whether similar mechanisms exist and uncover alternative nuclease domains that contribute to DNA cleavage. The HNH-Cascade system's precise DNA cleavage abilities hold promise for creating highly targeted genome-editing tools, with potential applications in gene therapy and other therapeutics requiring precise DNA modifications. Moreover, assessing potential off-target effects across different genomic contexts could enhance the safety and efficacy of these tools. In conclusion, the integration of the HNH domain within CRISPR-Cas systems marks a breakthrough in understanding microbial immunity and unlocks new possibilities for biotechnological innovation.</p><p><b>Senfeng Zhang and Yao Liu</b>: wrote the manuscript. <b>Chunyi Hu</b>: drew the figure and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.</p><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p><p>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":94133,"journal":{"name":"MedComm","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mco2.70060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedComm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mco2.70060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two recent cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) studies have captured the HNH domain's ability to replace Cas3 within the Cascade complex (CRISPR-associated complex for antiviral defense) in both type I-E and type I-F CRISPR-Cas systems.1, 2 These findings reveal that Cas3 is not required and the HNH domain forms a ring-like structure with Cascade, enabling precise DNA cleavage and providing a new avenue for understanding bacterial CRISPR-Cas immune responses.

CRISPR-Cas systems, which stand for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats and CRISPR-associated genes, are adaptive immunity mechanisms in bacteria and archaea, designed responsible for protecting against viral invasion. The immune response typically involves three stages: adaptation, expression, and interference. Based on the Cas effectors used during CRISPR interference, these systems are categorized into two classes and seven types. Class 1, including types I, III, IV, and VII, comprises multi-subunit Cas protein effector complexes, whereas Class 2, which includes types II, V, and VI, is composed of single-subunit Cas protein effectors.3, 4

In canonical type I systems, multiple Cas proteins assemble into a crRNA-containing Cascade complex, which stands for CRISPR-associated complex for antiviral defense, with the exclusion of Cas3. When the target DNA is recognized and full R-loop formation, Cas 3 is recruited as the catalytic module responsible for mediating target DNA cleavage.5 However, recent studies have identified two novel variant type I systems. In one variant, the type I-E system, the C-terminus of Cas5 is fused with an HNH domain, and in another variant, the type I-F system, the HNH domain is inserted into the C-terminus of Cas8 (Figure 1A). Despite lacking the Cas3 nuclease, the HNH-Cascade can still cleave target DNA. This is especially intriguing, as in type II CRISPR-Cas systems, the HNH nuclease domain is responsible for cleaving the DNA target strand in Cas9. Consequently, understanding the processes behind PAM recognition, crRNA guidance, and precise DNA cleavage in HNH-mediated immunity within type I-E and type I-F systems has emerged as a critical area of research.

The two papers published by Hirano et al. and Zhang et al. report cryo-EM studies in the 3.0–3.48 Å range, capturing distinct states of the target-free HNH-Cascade and target-bound HNH-Cascade complexes in the type I-F (Selenomonas sp) and type I-E (Candidatus Cloacimonetes) systems, respectively. These studies reveal that both the type I-F HNH-Cascade complex and the type I-E HNH-Cascade complex adopt a ring-like architecture that provides a clear view of how these systems achieve precise DNA cleavage (Figure 1B).

In the type I-F HNH-Cascade complex, the structure is organized into head, backbone, and tail regions, resembling the subunit arrangement of type I-F Cascade complexes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PaCascade). The Cas8-HNH domain replaces the Cas8-HB domain (the C-terminal helical bundle, equivalent to Cas11) and is positioned between the head and tail sections. Within the tail region, the Cas5-Cas8 heterodimer binds the crRNA's 5′-handle region along with the PAM-containing DNA duplex, while the head of Cascade is mainly composed of Cas6 and the crRNA's 3′-handle. Upon binding of the target DNA with crRNA, complete R-loop formation shifts the Cascade head outward, enabling Cas8-HNH to detach, rotate, and align for target DNA cleavage. Thus, Cas8 plays dual roles in PAM recognition and target cleavage in the type I-F HNH-Cascade system (Figure 1C). In contrast, the type I-E HNH-Cascade complex showcases the Cas5-HNH domain integrating into the “inner belly” of the complex, sandwiched and stabilized by Cas6 and Cas11, with the catalytic cleft facing towards Cas11 and against Cas6. The binding of target DNA and the formation of the full R-loop drive the movement of the crRNA 3′-handle, Cas6, and the Cas5-HNH domain together, widening the substrate channel formed by Cas5-HNH and Cas11, where it plays a pivotal role in DNA cleavage (Figure 1B).

In brief, the HNH endonuclease domain substitutes for the Cas3 helicase-nuclease, which is usually present in standard type I CRISPR-Cas systems. This research underscores the crucial role of crRNA-guided positioning in targeting DNA and reveals how the HNH domain enables precise DNA cleavage by facilitating target DNA exposure and cutting. Together with the Cascade scaffold, the HNH domain creates a positively charged groove that stabilizes the R-loop and ensures accurate, sequential nicking of both DNA strands.

These findings open further exploration into the adaptability and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Future research could focus on uncovering the evolutionary processes that incorporated the HNH domain into these immune systems, shedding light on their dynamic adaptability. Additionally, studying other CRISPR-Cas subtypes may reveal whether similar mechanisms exist and uncover alternative nuclease domains that contribute to DNA cleavage. The HNH-Cascade system's precise DNA cleavage abilities hold promise for creating highly targeted genome-editing tools, with potential applications in gene therapy and other therapeutics requiring precise DNA modifications. Moreover, assessing potential off-target effects across different genomic contexts could enhance the safety and efficacy of these tools. In conclusion, the integration of the HNH domain within CRISPR-Cas systems marks a breakthrough in understanding microbial immunity and unlocks new possibilities for biotechnological innovation.

Senfeng Zhang and Yao Liu: wrote the manuscript. Chunyi Hu: drew the figure and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Not applicable.

Abstract Image

用HNH结构域重新定义I型CRISPR系统中的DNA切割
最近的两项低温电子显微镜(cro - em)研究发现,在I-E型和I-F型CRISPR-Cas系统中,HNH结构域在级联复合体(用于抗病毒防御的crispr相关复合体)中取代Cas3的能力。1,2这些发现表明Cas3不是必需的,HNH结构域通过Cascade形成环状结构,从而实现精确的DNA切割,为理解细菌CRISPR-Cas免疫反应提供了新的途径。CRISPR-Cas系统,即聚集规则间隔短回文重复序列和crispr相关基因,是细菌和古细菌的适应性免疫机制,负责保护免受病毒入侵。免疫反应通常包括三个阶段:适应、表达和干扰。根据CRISPR干扰过程中使用的Cas效应剂,将这些系统分为两类七类。第1类,包括I、III、IV和VII型,包括多亚基Cas蛋白效应复合物,而第2类,包括II、V和VI型,由单亚基Cas蛋白效应复合物组成。3,4在典型的I型系统中,多个Cas蛋白组装成含有crrna的Cascade复合物,该复合物代表crispr相关复合物,用于抗病毒防御,Cas3被排除在外。当目标DNA被识别并形成完整的r环时,cas3被招募作为负责介导目标DNA切割的催化模块然而,最近的研究已经确定了两种新的变种I型系统。在I-E型系统的一种变体中,Cas5的c端与HNH结构域融合,在I-F型系统的另一种变体中,HNH结构域插入Cas8的c端(图1A)。尽管缺乏Cas3核酸酶,HNH-Cascade仍然可以切割目标DNA。这是特别有趣的,因为在II型CRISPR-Cas系统中,HNH核酸酶结构域负责切割Cas9中的DNA靶链。因此,了解在I-E型和I-F型系统中hnh介导的免疫中PAM识别、crRNA引导和精确DNA切割背后的过程已成为一个关键的研究领域。Hirano等人和Zhang等人发表的两篇论文报道了3.0-3.48 Å范围内的低温电镜研究,分别捕获了I-F型(Selenomonas sp)和I-E型(Candidatus Cloacimonetes)系统中无靶标HNH-Cascade和靶标结合HNH-Cascade复合物的不同状态。这些研究表明,I-F型HNH-Cascade复合物和I-E型HNH-Cascade复合物都采用环状结构,这为这些系统如何实现精确的DNA切割提供了清晰的视角(图1B)。在I-F型HNH-Cascade复合体中,结构被组织成头部、骨干和尾部区域,类似于铜绿假单胞菌(Pseudomonas aeruginosa, PaCascade)中I-F型级联复合体的亚基排列。Cas8-HNH结构域取代Cas8-HB结构域(c端螺旋束,相当于Cas11),位于头部和尾部之间。在尾部区域,Cas5-Cas8异源二聚体与含有pam的DNA双链结合crRNA的5 ' -handle区域,而Cascade的头部主要由Cas6和crRNA的3 ' -handle组成。当目标DNA与crRNA结合时,完整的R-loop形成将Cascade头向外移动,使Cas8-HNH能够分离、旋转和对准目标DNA切割。因此,在I-F型HNH-Cascade系统中,Cas8在PAM识别和靶标切割中起双重作用(图1C)。相比之下,I-E型HNH-Cascade复合物显示Cas5-HNH结构域整合到复合物的“内腹”,被Cas6和Cas11夹在中间并稳定,催化裂口面向Cas11和对抗Cas6。靶DNA的结合和完整r环的形成驱动crRNA 3’柄、Cas6和Cas5-HNH结构域一起运动,扩大Cas5-HNH和Cas11形成的底物通道,在DNA切割中起关键作用(图1B)。简而言之,HNH内切酶结构域替代Cas3解旋酶核酸酶,Cas3解旋酶核酸酶通常存在于标准的I型CRISPR-Cas系统中。这项研究强调了crrna引导定位在靶向DNA中的关键作用,并揭示了HNH结构域如何通过促进靶DNA的暴露和切割来实现精确的DNA切割。与级联支架一起,HNH结构域创建了一个带正电的凹槽,稳定r环,并确保两条DNA链的准确、顺序的切口。这些发现为进一步探索CRISPR-Cas系统的适应性和进化打开了大门。未来的研究可能会集中在揭示将HNH结构域纳入这些免疫系统的进化过程上,从而揭示它们的动态适应性。 此外,研究其他CRISPR-Cas亚型可能揭示是否存在类似的机制,并揭示有助于DNA切割的其他核酸酶结构域。HNH-Cascade系统的精确DNA切割能力有望创造高度靶向的基因组编辑工具,在基因治疗和其他需要精确DNA修饰的治疗中具有潜在的应用前景。此外,评估不同基因组背景下潜在的脱靶效应可以提高这些工具的安全性和有效性。总之,在CRISPR-Cas系统中整合HNH结构域标志着理解微生物免疫的突破,并为生物技术创新开辟了新的可能性。张森峰、刘尧:原稿作者。胡春义:绘制图形,审定定稿。所有作者都阅读并批准了最终稿件。作者声明无利益冲突。不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信