Understanding teacher ethico-political identity formation from a Foucauldian perspective

IF 3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Desmond Carswell, Paul F. Conway
{"title":"Understanding teacher ethico-political identity formation from a Foucauldian perspective","authors":"Desmond Carswell,&nbsp;Paul F. Conway","doi":"10.1002/berj.4079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, we have seen an increased politicisation and objectification of what teachers should know, what teachers should do and who teachers should be while they are doing it. While evident across the continua of teacher education, such politicised constructions are particularly acute at initial teacher education. Given such attention to constructing what has been described as a ‘preferred’ teacher identity, this paper explores how prospective teachers construct themselves in ethico-political terms (i.e., how prospective teachers construct the relationship that they have with themselves and how they account for themselves in that regard). Informed by a Foucauldian perspective and using a composite case that draws on interview data (photovoice and semi-structured interviews) from a small sample (<i>n</i> = 4) of prospective Irish primary school teachers at various stages during their final semester of initial teacher education, this paper addresses ethico-political identity in terms of substance, authority sources, self-practices and telos. Findings illuminate prospective teacher ethico-political identity as: (i) substance as the basis for nascent teacher practical knowing-in-action and pedagogical sensitivities; (ii) temporally organised authority sources; (iii) dynamic and interrelated self-practices; and (iv) telos as a form of identity prolepsis that emphasises three major valuational endpoints. The paper concludes by contemplating the generativity of an ethico-political conceptualisation of teacher identity (re)formation for teacher education purposes in terms of its conceptual, contextual, critical and reflective utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":51410,"journal":{"name":"British Educational Research Journal","volume":"51 1","pages":"321-343"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/berj.4079","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Educational Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/berj.4079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, we have seen an increased politicisation and objectification of what teachers should know, what teachers should do and who teachers should be while they are doing it. While evident across the continua of teacher education, such politicised constructions are particularly acute at initial teacher education. Given such attention to constructing what has been described as a ‘preferred’ teacher identity, this paper explores how prospective teachers construct themselves in ethico-political terms (i.e., how prospective teachers construct the relationship that they have with themselves and how they account for themselves in that regard). Informed by a Foucauldian perspective and using a composite case that draws on interview data (photovoice and semi-structured interviews) from a small sample (n = 4) of prospective Irish primary school teachers at various stages during their final semester of initial teacher education, this paper addresses ethico-political identity in terms of substance, authority sources, self-practices and telos. Findings illuminate prospective teacher ethico-political identity as: (i) substance as the basis for nascent teacher practical knowing-in-action and pedagogical sensitivities; (ii) temporally organised authority sources; (iii) dynamic and interrelated self-practices; and (iv) telos as a form of identity prolepsis that emphasises three major valuational endpoints. The paper concludes by contemplating the generativity of an ethico-political conceptualisation of teacher identity (re)formation for teacher education purposes in terms of its conceptual, contextual, critical and reflective utility.

Abstract Image

从福柯的视角看教师伦理政治认同的形成
近年来,我们看到教师应该知道什么、教师应该做什么以及教师在做这些事情时应该成为什么样的人,这些问题越来越政治化和客观化。尽管在整个教师教育过程中都很明显,但这种政治化的建构在初级教师教育中尤为突出。鉴于对构建被描述为“首选”教师身份的关注,本文探讨了未来教师如何在伦理-政治术语中构建自己(即,未来教师如何构建他们与自己的关系以及他们如何在这方面为自己负责)。本文以福柯式的观点为依据,采用了一个综合案例,从一个小样本(n = 4)的潜在爱尔兰小学教师在其初级教师教育的最后一个学期的不同阶段中获取访谈数据(照片语音和半结构化访谈),从实质、权威来源、自我实践和终极目标等方面探讨了伦理政治认同。研究结果阐明了未来教师的伦理政治认同:(i)作为新生教师实践行动认知和教学敏感性基础的物质;(ii)临时组织的权威来源;(iii)动态和相互关联的自我实践;(iv) telos作为一种身份预言形式,强调三个主要的价值终点。最后,本文从概念上、语境上、批判上和反思上思考了教师身份(再造)形成的伦理-政治概念化的生成性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Educational Research Journal
British Educational Research Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The British Educational Research Journal is an international peer reviewed medium for the publication of articles of interest to researchers in education and has rapidly become a major focal point for the publication of educational research from throughout the world. For further information on the association please visit the British Educational Research Association web site. The journal is interdisciplinary in approach, and includes reports of case studies, experiments and surveys, discussions of conceptual and methodological issues and of underlying assumptions in educational research, accounts of research in progress, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信