Short-term impacts of selective logging on forest elephants

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Morgane Scalbert, Davy Fonteyn, Fructueux Houngbégnon, Robin Scalbert, Cédric Vermeulen, Barbara Haurez, Simon Lhoest, Yves Brostaux, Gauthier Ligot, Anaïs-Pasiphaé Gorel, Jean-Louis Doucet
{"title":"Short-term impacts of selective logging on forest elephants","authors":"Morgane Scalbert,&nbsp;Davy Fonteyn,&nbsp;Fructueux Houngbégnon,&nbsp;Robin Scalbert,&nbsp;Cédric Vermeulen,&nbsp;Barbara Haurez,&nbsp;Simon Lhoest,&nbsp;Yves Brostaux,&nbsp;Gauthier Ligot,&nbsp;Anaïs-Pasiphaé Gorel,&nbsp;Jean-Louis Doucet","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although forest elephants (<i>Loxodonta cyclotis</i>) are known to use logged forests, the impact of selective logging on this critically endangered species has never been well established. Considering the potential of some logged areas to serve as other effective area-based conservation measures, aligning with the Convention on Biological Diversity's 30/30 initiative, we aimed to assess the short-term impacts of logging on three population parameters: the presence, abundance, and activity of forest elephants. Combining camera traps and dung surveys before and after logging operations, we assessed the response of forest elephants in a certified timber concession in Gabon. Encouragingly, we found no negative effects of logging on the three population parameters studied. There was no discernible change in the presence of elephants after logging, and their abundance actually increased (relative abundance index from 1.56 to 2.59; <i>p</i>-value 0.0139) at one of the study sites. Activity patterns were also unaffected, showing sustained activity during daylight hours. We also identified the logging-associated factors that have significantly influenced forest elephant's abundance. Notably, logging intensity, as measured by the average number of trees harvested per hectare, and road density were positively correlated with the number of forest elephant observations (logging intensity effect: 0.2992, <i>p</i>-value 0.035; road density effect: 0.3628, <i>p</i>-value 0.060). As global conservation goals evolve, this research provides important insights into the coexistence of well-managed industrial activities and the conservation of endangered species, highlighting the need to include responsibly managed timber concessions in future conservation strategies. It also underscores the importance of wider adoption of sustainable practices such as low-impact logging, promoted by certification schemes such as FSC or PEFC, to secure the future of central African forests and their unique wildlife.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13300","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.13300","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis) are known to use logged forests, the impact of selective logging on this critically endangered species has never been well established. Considering the potential of some logged areas to serve as other effective area-based conservation measures, aligning with the Convention on Biological Diversity's 30/30 initiative, we aimed to assess the short-term impacts of logging on three population parameters: the presence, abundance, and activity of forest elephants. Combining camera traps and dung surveys before and after logging operations, we assessed the response of forest elephants in a certified timber concession in Gabon. Encouragingly, we found no negative effects of logging on the three population parameters studied. There was no discernible change in the presence of elephants after logging, and their abundance actually increased (relative abundance index from 1.56 to 2.59; p-value 0.0139) at one of the study sites. Activity patterns were also unaffected, showing sustained activity during daylight hours. We also identified the logging-associated factors that have significantly influenced forest elephant's abundance. Notably, logging intensity, as measured by the average number of trees harvested per hectare, and road density were positively correlated with the number of forest elephant observations (logging intensity effect: 0.2992, p-value 0.035; road density effect: 0.3628, p-value 0.060). As global conservation goals evolve, this research provides important insights into the coexistence of well-managed industrial activities and the conservation of endangered species, highlighting the need to include responsibly managed timber concessions in future conservation strategies. It also underscores the importance of wider adoption of sustainable practices such as low-impact logging, promoted by certification schemes such as FSC or PEFC, to secure the future of central African forests and their unique wildlife.

Abstract Image

选择性砍伐对森林象的短期影响
虽然已知森林象(Loxodonta cyclotis)使用被砍伐的森林,但选择性砍伐对这种极度濒危物种的影响从未得到很好的确定。考虑到一些被砍伐地区作为其他有效的基于区域的保护措施的潜力,与生物多样性公约的30/30倡议保持一致,我们旨在评估伐木对三个种群参数的短期影响:森林象的存在、丰度和活动。通过在伐木作业前后结合相机陷阱和粪便调查,我们评估了加蓬一个经认证的木材特许经营区内森林象的反应。令人鼓舞的是,我们发现伐木对所研究的三个种群参数没有负面影响。在伐木之后,大象的存在没有明显的变化,它们的丰度实际上增加了(相对丰度指数从1.56增加到2.59;p值为0.0139)。活动模式也不受影响,在白天持续活动。我们还确定了与伐木相关的因素,这些因素对森林象的丰度有显著影响。值得注意的是,采伐强度(以每公顷平均采伐树木数衡量)和道路密度与森林象观测数量呈正相关(采伐强度效应:0.2992,p值0.035;道路密度效应:0.3628,p值0.060)。随着全球保护目标的发展,这项研究为管理良好的工业活动和濒危物种保护的共存提供了重要的见解,强调了在未来的保护战略中包括负责任管理的木材特许权的必要性。它还强调了更广泛地采用可持续做法的重要性,例如由FSC或PEFC等认证计划推动的低影响伐木,以确保中非森林及其独特野生动物的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信