Feasibility and evolution studies on renewable energy communities in cities

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
G. Cavana , C. Becchio , M. Bottero
{"title":"Feasibility and evolution studies on renewable energy communities in cities","authors":"G. Cavana ,&nbsp;C. Becchio ,&nbsp;M. Bottero","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Renewable energy communities could play a key role in the decarbonisation of the building stock, while providing important benefits to the members. This paper reviews the existing literature on this topic of growing scholarly interest. Three clusters have been identified, grouping the most common approaches to study feasibility analysis and the drivers that encourage individual participation. The paper also explores the role that different actors and forms of self-organisation might play in the development of these communities. The findings highlight a lack of homogeneity in the literature in conceptualising the benefits of renewable energy communities for different stakeholders. There is also evidence that little attention has been paid in the research to energy efficiency measures and the reduction of energy consumption. Financial costs and benefits are the main drivers, while environmental concerns and the desire to reduce dependence on energy-related uncertainties emerge as influential in community participation. Finally, a comparison of Italian case studies reveals a lack of comparability between studies due to discrepancies in the conceptualisation and calculation of indicators, such as the variation of self-sufficiency ratios ranging from 35.6 % to 83.8 % between reported and recalculated results. The insights gained from this study can help lay the ground for the establishment of a cross-sectorial approach to renewable energy community studies. A further important contribution of this work is to draw attention to the need for a common framework for assessing the performance of these communities. Finally, this study also usefully proposes clear calculation boundaries for the definition of indicators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 115477"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001509","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Renewable energy communities could play a key role in the decarbonisation of the building stock, while providing important benefits to the members. This paper reviews the existing literature on this topic of growing scholarly interest. Three clusters have been identified, grouping the most common approaches to study feasibility analysis and the drivers that encourage individual participation. The paper also explores the role that different actors and forms of self-organisation might play in the development of these communities. The findings highlight a lack of homogeneity in the literature in conceptualising the benefits of renewable energy communities for different stakeholders. There is also evidence that little attention has been paid in the research to energy efficiency measures and the reduction of energy consumption. Financial costs and benefits are the main drivers, while environmental concerns and the desire to reduce dependence on energy-related uncertainties emerge as influential in community participation. Finally, a comparison of Italian case studies reveals a lack of comparability between studies due to discrepancies in the conceptualisation and calculation of indicators, such as the variation of self-sufficiency ratios ranging from 35.6 % to 83.8 % between reported and recalculated results. The insights gained from this study can help lay the ground for the establishment of a cross-sectorial approach to renewable energy community studies. A further important contribution of this work is to draw attention to the need for a common framework for assessing the performance of these communities. Finally, this study also usefully proposes clear calculation boundaries for the definition of indicators.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信