Comparative evaluation of cationic and anionic dye removal using graphene oxide fabricated by Hummers and Couette-Taylor flow methods

IF 3.1 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Chaehwi Lim , Namgyu Kim , Junho Lee , Yeojoon Yoon
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of cationic and anionic dye removal using graphene oxide fabricated by Hummers and Couette-Taylor flow methods","authors":"Chaehwi Lim ,&nbsp;Namgyu Kim ,&nbsp;Junho Lee ,&nbsp;Yeojoon Yoon","doi":"10.1016/j.cartre.2025.100476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Graphene oxide (GO) has garnered significant attention from researchers owing to its exceptional physicochemical properties. GO is typically synthesized through chemical oxidation followed by exfoliation processes. In this study, we employed the Hummers method and the Couette-Taylor flow method to produce GO. The Couette-Taylor flow method offers the advantage of shorter oxidation reaction times and reduced wastewater compared to the Hummers method. We conducted surface analysis (including scanning electron microscope(SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy(XPS), Zeta potential, multiple-point Brunauer Emmett Teller(BET), and atomic force microscope(AFM)) to assess and compare the surface characteristics of GO. Our analysis revealed that GO synthesized using the Couette-Taylor flow method (GO/Taylor) exhibited smaller lateral sizes. Additionally, we performed Particle Size Distribution Analysis (PSA) to verify the particle distribution of GO. The mean particle sizes of GO produced via the Hummers method and the Couette-Taylor flow method were determined to be 49.87 μm and 28.97 μm, respectively. These differences in surface properties and particle sizes influenced the adsorption capacity of GO for dyes. Considering the polarity, Cationic dye (BV1) and anionic dye (RR141) were selected for our adsorption experiments based on their polarity. Furthermore, we employed kinetic and isotherm adsorption modeling to analyze the adsorption mechanism in detail.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52629,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Trends","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100476"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667056925000264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) has garnered significant attention from researchers owing to its exceptional physicochemical properties. GO is typically synthesized through chemical oxidation followed by exfoliation processes. In this study, we employed the Hummers method and the Couette-Taylor flow method to produce GO. The Couette-Taylor flow method offers the advantage of shorter oxidation reaction times and reduced wastewater compared to the Hummers method. We conducted surface analysis (including scanning electron microscope(SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy(XPS), Zeta potential, multiple-point Brunauer Emmett Teller(BET), and atomic force microscope(AFM)) to assess and compare the surface characteristics of GO. Our analysis revealed that GO synthesized using the Couette-Taylor flow method (GO/Taylor) exhibited smaller lateral sizes. Additionally, we performed Particle Size Distribution Analysis (PSA) to verify the particle distribution of GO. The mean particle sizes of GO produced via the Hummers method and the Couette-Taylor flow method were determined to be 49.87 μm and 28.97 μm, respectively. These differences in surface properties and particle sizes influenced the adsorption capacity of GO for dyes. Considering the polarity, Cationic dye (BV1) and anionic dye (RR141) were selected for our adsorption experiments based on their polarity. Furthermore, we employed kinetic and isotherm adsorption modeling to analyze the adsorption mechanism in detail.

Abstract Image

用Hummers和Couette-Taylor流动法制备氧化石墨烯去除阳离子和阴离子染料的比较评价
氧化石墨烯(GO)以其独特的物理化学性质受到了研究人员的广泛关注。氧化石墨烯通常是通过化学氧化和去角质过程合成的。在本研究中,我们采用Hummers法和Couette-Taylor流法生产氧化石墨烯。与Hummers方法相比,Couette-Taylor流动法的优点是氧化反应时间短,废水减少。我们通过扫描电镜(SEM)、x射线光电子能谱(XPS)、Zeta电位、多点布鲁纳埃米特泰勒(BET)和原子力显微镜(AFM)等方法对氧化石墨烯的表面特性进行了评价和比较。我们的分析表明,采用Couette-Taylor流动法合成的氧化石墨烯(GO/Taylor)具有较小的横向尺寸。此外,我们进行了粒度分布分析(PSA)来验证氧化石墨烯的颗粒分布。Hummers法和Couette-Taylor法制备的氧化石墨烯平均粒径分别为49.87 μm和28.97 μm。这些表面性质和颗粒大小的差异影响了氧化石墨烯对染料的吸附能力。考虑极性,选择阳离子染料(BV1)和阴离子染料(RR141)进行吸附实验。此外,我们采用动力学和等温吸附模型详细分析了吸附机理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Carbon Trends
Carbon Trends Materials Science-Materials Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
77 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信