Pesticides and veterinary pharmaceuticals in neotropical avian carnivores: A scoping review

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kane Colston , Nicola J. Rooney , Nick Cherbanich , Mariam Logunleko , Juan M. Grande , Irene Bueno
{"title":"Pesticides and veterinary pharmaceuticals in neotropical avian carnivores: A scoping review","authors":"Kane Colston ,&nbsp;Nicola J. Rooney ,&nbsp;Nick Cherbanich ,&nbsp;Mariam Logunleko ,&nbsp;Juan M. Grande ,&nbsp;Irene Bueno","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Organic contaminants have long been known to have negative consequences for wildlife health. For avian carnivores, particular concern surrounds the use of compounds such as pesticides and pharmaceutical drugs, derived from global agricultural and veterinary practices. Previous cases of avian poisoning in North America, Europe and Asia have received great attention, owing to significant declines in avian populations and wider consequences. By contrast, the Neotropics, comprised of Latin America and the Caribbean, has received relatively little attention, despite an extensive agricultural sector and uniquely high avian biodiversity. To evaluate the available evidence on this topic, a scoping review on the effects of agriculturally derived organic contaminants on Neotropical avian carnivores was conducted. Articles from seven databases were screened using exclusion criteria. Of these, 206 primary research articles published since 1965 were identified, investigating 144 compounds in 83 species. Findings indicate substantial knowledge gaps, particularly in observational studies conducted within the Neotropics. Whilst cross-sectional studies were fairly well-represented, with transitions towards less-invasive sampling methods, there were few longitudinal studies, raising concerns of undetected chronic exposure in Neotropical populations. Multiple avian taxonomic families were underrepresented, including globally recognized sentinel species – the osprey and barn owl, as were pharmaceutical drugs in comparison to pesticides. There was a large geographical bias in observational study location, with no research outputs identified from most Neotropical countries. Further research in the Neotropics is required to better understand the pervasiveness of contaminants in native populations, along with improving our understanding of their precise consequences on avian carnivore health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"967 ","pages":"Article 178795"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725004309","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organic contaminants have long been known to have negative consequences for wildlife health. For avian carnivores, particular concern surrounds the use of compounds such as pesticides and pharmaceutical drugs, derived from global agricultural and veterinary practices. Previous cases of avian poisoning in North America, Europe and Asia have received great attention, owing to significant declines in avian populations and wider consequences. By contrast, the Neotropics, comprised of Latin America and the Caribbean, has received relatively little attention, despite an extensive agricultural sector and uniquely high avian biodiversity. To evaluate the available evidence on this topic, a scoping review on the effects of agriculturally derived organic contaminants on Neotropical avian carnivores was conducted. Articles from seven databases were screened using exclusion criteria. Of these, 206 primary research articles published since 1965 were identified, investigating 144 compounds in 83 species. Findings indicate substantial knowledge gaps, particularly in observational studies conducted within the Neotropics. Whilst cross-sectional studies were fairly well-represented, with transitions towards less-invasive sampling methods, there were few longitudinal studies, raising concerns of undetected chronic exposure in Neotropical populations. Multiple avian taxonomic families were underrepresented, including globally recognized sentinel species – the osprey and barn owl, as were pharmaceutical drugs in comparison to pesticides. There was a large geographical bias in observational study location, with no research outputs identified from most Neotropical countries. Further research in the Neotropics is required to better understand the pervasiveness of contaminants in native populations, along with improving our understanding of their precise consequences on avian carnivore health.

Abstract Image

新热带食肉鸟类的农药和兽药:范围综述
人们早就知道有机污染物会对野生动物的健康产生负面影响。对于禽类食肉动物来说,特别值得关注的是农药和药物等化合物的使用,这些化合物来自全球农业和兽医实践。此前在北美、欧洲和亚洲发生的禽类中毒事件受到了高度关注,原因是禽类数量大幅减少,后果更为广泛。相比之下,由拉丁美洲和加勒比组成的新热带地区受到的关注相对较少,尽管有广泛的农业部门和独特的高鸟类生物多样性。为了评估这一主题的现有证据,对农业来源的有机污染物对新热带鸟类食肉动物的影响进行了范围审查。采用排除标准对来自7个数据库的文章进行筛选。其中,自1965年以来发表的206篇主要研究论文被鉴定出来,研究了83个物种的144种化合物。研究结果表明存在大量的知识空白,特别是在新热带地区进行的观察性研究中。虽然横断面研究具有相当好的代表性,并向低侵入性采样方法过渡,但很少有纵向研究,这引起了人们对新热带人群未被发现的慢性暴露的担忧。多个鸟类分类科的代表性不足,包括全球公认的哨兵物种——鱼鹰和仓鸮,与农药相比,药物的代表性不足。观察性研究地点存在较大的地理偏倚,大多数新热带国家没有确定研究成果。需要在新热带地区进行进一步的研究,以更好地了解污染物在当地种群中的普遍存在,同时提高我们对它们对鸟类食肉动物健康的确切后果的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信