Leveraging temporal variability in global sensitivity analysis of the Daisy soil-plant-atmosphere model

IF 4.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Laura Delhez , Benjamin Dumont , Bernard Longdoz
{"title":"Leveraging temporal variability in global sensitivity analysis of the Daisy soil-plant-atmosphere model","authors":"Laura Delhez ,&nbsp;Benjamin Dumont ,&nbsp;Bernard Longdoz","doi":"10.1016/j.eja.2025.127533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dynamic crop models, such as the Daisy soil-plant-atmosphere model, simulate many processes and encompass a large number of parameters. Global sensitivity analysis (GSA) aims to identify the most influential parameters and understand model structure and behaviour. However, little attention has been paid to the temporal dynamics of parameter sensitivity in crop models, even though it can provide greater insight into model structure. This study performs a comprehensive GSA on the Daisy model, including the soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer (SVAT) module, focusing on crop yield as well as CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and energy fluxes. The Sobol’ method was applied to two types of outputs: (i) outputs aggregated into a scalar with an objective function (RMSE or cumulative) and (ii) vector outputs analysed at each time step. The main objectives of this paper were to compare the temporal and aggregated applications of GSA and to identify influential parameters of Daisy under different environmental conditions. Both aggregated and temporal methods identified the same main parameters. Nevertheless, temporal analysis provided deeper insight into model behaviour and calibration guidelines, revealing dynamic changes in parameter sensitivity at weekly and hourly resolutions and identifying critical periods for calibration. Aggregated analysis was less time-consuming and focused on specific aspects due to the definition of the objective function. Finally, we discussed the risks and solutions for Daisy over-parameterisation as well as methods for parameter estimation based on information provided by the GSA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Agronomy","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 127533"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030125000292","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dynamic crop models, such as the Daisy soil-plant-atmosphere model, simulate many processes and encompass a large number of parameters. Global sensitivity analysis (GSA) aims to identify the most influential parameters and understand model structure and behaviour. However, little attention has been paid to the temporal dynamics of parameter sensitivity in crop models, even though it can provide greater insight into model structure. This study performs a comprehensive GSA on the Daisy model, including the soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer (SVAT) module, focusing on crop yield as well as CO2, N2O and energy fluxes. The Sobol’ method was applied to two types of outputs: (i) outputs aggregated into a scalar with an objective function (RMSE or cumulative) and (ii) vector outputs analysed at each time step. The main objectives of this paper were to compare the temporal and aggregated applications of GSA and to identify influential parameters of Daisy under different environmental conditions. Both aggregated and temporal methods identified the same main parameters. Nevertheless, temporal analysis provided deeper insight into model behaviour and calibration guidelines, revealing dynamic changes in parameter sensitivity at weekly and hourly resolutions and identifying critical periods for calibration. Aggregated analysis was less time-consuming and focused on specific aspects due to the definition of the objective function. Finally, we discussed the risks and solutions for Daisy over-parameterisation as well as methods for parameter estimation based on information provided by the GSA.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Agronomy
European Journal of Agronomy 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Agronomy, the official journal of the European Society for Agronomy, publishes original research papers reporting experimental and theoretical contributions to field-based agronomy and crop science. The journal will consider research at the field level for agricultural, horticultural and tree crops, that uses comprehensive and explanatory approaches. The EJA covers the following topics: crop physiology crop production and management including irrigation, fertilization and soil management agroclimatology and modelling plant-soil relationships crop quality and post-harvest physiology farming and cropping systems agroecosystems and the environment crop-weed interactions and management organic farming horticultural crops papers from the European Society for Agronomy bi-annual meetings In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny is placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in agronomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信