Validity of LEFM to measure the Mode II and Mixed Mode I/II fracture toughness of adhesively bonded CFRP

IF 8.1 2区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Fengzhen Sun , Qianming Wang , Bamber R.K. Blackman
{"title":"Validity of LEFM to measure the Mode II and Mixed Mode I/II fracture toughness of adhesively bonded CFRP","authors":"Fengzhen Sun ,&nbsp;Qianming Wang ,&nbsp;Bamber R.K. Blackman","doi":"10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.108777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this work, the validity of Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) for measuring the energy release rates for adhesively bonded carbon fibre reinforced plastic (CFRP) joints under Mode II and Mixed Mode I/II loading, using end loaded split (ELS) and fixed ratio mixed mode (FRMM) specimens respectively, has been investigated. The <em>G</em> values determined using LEFM coupled with an effective crack length approach have been compared with the <em>J</em>-integral values measured simultaneously using the crack length independent slope-based <em>J-</em>integral methods. It is shown that higher <em>G</em><sub>IIc</sub> values than <em>J</em><sub>IIc</sub> values were measured using ELS specimens, but the <em>G</em><sub>I/IIc</sub> values were in good agreement with the <em>J</em><sub>I/IIc</sub> values measured using FRMM specimens. It is shown (by experimental and numerical investigations) that LEFM became invalid in Mode II due to the occurrence of local damage in the bondline of the specimen close to the clamp. This local damage resulted in erroneously high <em>G</em><sub>IIc</sub> values being measured via LEFM. In contrast, the <em>J</em> method was able to provide accurate and valid toughness values as the contribution of local damage could be excluded through careful selection of the integral contour. Further analysis indicates that, if the local damage was eliminated by adding additional constraint to the specimen at the clamp, then valid values of <em>G</em><sub>IIc</sub> via LEFM could be obtained. The <em>J</em>-integral method in this work provides an alternative tool to determine the fracture toughness of adhesive joints under Mode II loading in case of additional (secondary) damage outside the fracture process zone (FPZ) occurs, which is quite challenging for LEFM methods to separate the energy dissipated in and outside the FPZ.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":282,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 108777"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359835X25000715","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, the validity of Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) for measuring the energy release rates for adhesively bonded carbon fibre reinforced plastic (CFRP) joints under Mode II and Mixed Mode I/II loading, using end loaded split (ELS) and fixed ratio mixed mode (FRMM) specimens respectively, has been investigated. The G values determined using LEFM coupled with an effective crack length approach have been compared with the J-integral values measured simultaneously using the crack length independent slope-based J-integral methods. It is shown that higher GIIc values than JIIc values were measured using ELS specimens, but the GI/IIc values were in good agreement with the JI/IIc values measured using FRMM specimens. It is shown (by experimental and numerical investigations) that LEFM became invalid in Mode II due to the occurrence of local damage in the bondline of the specimen close to the clamp. This local damage resulted in erroneously high GIIc values being measured via LEFM. In contrast, the J method was able to provide accurate and valid toughness values as the contribution of local damage could be excluded through careful selection of the integral contour. Further analysis indicates that, if the local damage was eliminated by adding additional constraint to the specimen at the clamp, then valid values of GIIc via LEFM could be obtained. The J-integral method in this work provides an alternative tool to determine the fracture toughness of adhesive joints under Mode II loading in case of additional (secondary) damage outside the fracture process zone (FPZ) occurs, which is quite challenging for LEFM methods to separate the energy dissipated in and outside the FPZ.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing
Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
492
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing is a comprehensive journal that publishes original research papers, review articles, case studies, short communications, and letters covering various aspects of composite materials science and technology. This includes fibrous and particulate reinforcements in polymeric, metallic, and ceramic matrices, as well as 'natural' composites like wood and biological materials. The journal addresses topics such as properties, design, and manufacture of reinforcing fibers and particles, novel architectures and concepts, multifunctional composites, advancements in fabrication and processing, manufacturing science, process modeling, experimental mechanics, microstructural characterization, interfaces, prediction and measurement of mechanical, physical, and chemical behavior, and performance in service. Additionally, articles on economic and commercial aspects, design, and case studies are welcomed. All submissions undergo rigorous peer review to ensure they contribute significantly and innovatively, maintaining high standards for content and presentation. The editorial team aims to expedite the review process for prompt publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信