Conor S. Gillespie , John Gerrard Hanrahan , Roxana Mahdiyar , Keng Siang Lee , Mohammad Ashraf , Ali M. Alam , Justyna O. Ekert , Orla Mantle , Simon C. Williams , Jonathan P. Funnell , Nihal Gurusinghe , Raghu Vindlacheruvu , Peter C. Whitfield (Prof) , Rikin A. Trivedi , Adel Helmy , Peter J. Hutchinson (Prof)
{"title":"Diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage: Systematic evaluation of CT head diagnostic accuracy and comparison with the 2022 NICE guidelines","authors":"Conor S. Gillespie , John Gerrard Hanrahan , Roxana Mahdiyar , Keng Siang Lee , Mohammad Ashraf , Ali M. Alam , Justyna O. Ekert , Orla Mantle , Simon C. Williams , Jonathan P. Funnell , Nihal Gurusinghe , Raghu Vindlacheruvu , Peter C. Whitfield (Prof) , Rikin A. Trivedi , Adel Helmy , Peter J. Hutchinson (Prof)","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage has a high incidence, and morbidity. It has been suggested that a negative non-contrast CT head can rule out SAH if performed within 6 h of symptom onset.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>What is the sensitivity of CT head at ruling out SAH stratified by time-point, and what is the potential impact of omitting Lumbar Puncture (LP) from the diagnostic pathway?</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPEROID CRD42022379929). Three databases were searched, and articles published between January 2000–May 2022 included (Search date 27<sup>th</sup> November 2022). Primary objective was diagnostic accuracy of CT scans for detecting SAH at <6 h from symptom onset, including reported sensitivity, and specificity values.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>63 articles were included (38,237 patients, 7673 with SAH). Pooled CT head sensitivity was 0.94 for excluding SAH (22 studies, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.90–0.97). At <6 h, CT head sensitivity was 0.995 (6 studies, 95% CI 0.941–1.000). Most studies (57.1%, n = 36/63) were classified as high risk of bias. If LP was removed from the diagnostic pathway in the UK, assuming an incidence of 4800 SAH per-year, 336 SAH would be missed per-year, 24 per-year if LP was removed for negative CT < 6 h (95% CI 0–278) and 58 per-year if mean sensitivity is used (95% CI 0–240).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><div>CT head appears to be highly sensitive at excluding SAH <6 h from symptom onset. High quality, prospective data is required to further established the utility of early (<6 h) negative CT head. We recommend that if there is strong clinical suspicion of SAH, yet CT head is reported negative <6 h of symptom onset, that a LP be performed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 104200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529425000190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage has a high incidence, and morbidity. It has been suggested that a negative non-contrast CT head can rule out SAH if performed within 6 h of symptom onset.
Research question
What is the sensitivity of CT head at ruling out SAH stratified by time-point, and what is the potential impact of omitting Lumbar Puncture (LP) from the diagnostic pathway?
Material and methods
Systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPEROID CRD42022379929). Three databases were searched, and articles published between January 2000–May 2022 included (Search date 27th November 2022). Primary objective was diagnostic accuracy of CT scans for detecting SAH at <6 h from symptom onset, including reported sensitivity, and specificity values.
Results
63 articles were included (38,237 patients, 7673 with SAH). Pooled CT head sensitivity was 0.94 for excluding SAH (22 studies, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.90–0.97). At <6 h, CT head sensitivity was 0.995 (6 studies, 95% CI 0.941–1.000). Most studies (57.1%, n = 36/63) were classified as high risk of bias. If LP was removed from the diagnostic pathway in the UK, assuming an incidence of 4800 SAH per-year, 336 SAH would be missed per-year, 24 per-year if LP was removed for negative CT < 6 h (95% CI 0–278) and 58 per-year if mean sensitivity is used (95% CI 0–240).
Discussion and conclusion
CT head appears to be highly sensitive at excluding SAH <6 h from symptom onset. High quality, prospective data is required to further established the utility of early (<6 h) negative CT head. We recommend that if there is strong clinical suspicion of SAH, yet CT head is reported negative <6 h of symptom onset, that a LP be performed.
摘要动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血是一种发病率高、发病率高的疾病。有人建议,如果在症状出现后6小时内进行非对比CT头阴性检查,可以排除SAH。研究问题:CT头在按时间点分层排除SAH时的敏感性是什么?在诊断途径中省略腰椎穿刺(LP)有什么潜在影响?材料和方法:系统评价和荟萃分析(PROSPEROID CRD42022379929)。检索了三个数据库,包括2000年1月至2022年5月发表的文章(检索日期为2022年11月27日)。主要目的是在症状出现后6小时内CT扫描检测SAH的诊断准确性,包括报告的敏感性和特异性值。结果共纳入文献63篇(38237例患者,其中7673例为SAH)。排除SAH的CT头部综合敏感性为0.94(22项研究,95%可信区间[CI] 0.90-0.97)。6 h时,CT头部敏感性为0.995(6项研究,95% CI 0.941-1.000)。大多数研究(57.1%,n = 36/63)被归为高偏倚风险。如果将LP从英国的诊断途径中剔除,假设每年4800例SAH的发病率,每年将遗漏336例SAH,如果因CT和lt阴性而切除LP,每年将遗漏24例SAH;6小时(95% CI 0-278),如果使用平均敏感性,则为每年58小时(95% CI 0-240)。讨论与结论ct头在症状出现后6小时内排除SAH具有高度敏感性。需要高质量的前瞻性数据来进一步确定早期(6小时)阴性CT头的效用。我们建议,如果有强烈的临床怀疑为SAH,但在症状出现后6小时CT头报告为阴性,则应行LP检查。