“Am I trying hard or harder than others?”: Gender differences in reciprocal relations between perceived effort, science self-concept, and achievement in chemistry
Hyewon Lee , Shirley L. Yu , Tzu-Jung Lin , Minjung Kim
{"title":"“Am I trying hard or harder than others?”: Gender differences in reciprocal relations between perceived effort, science self-concept, and achievement in chemistry","authors":"Hyewon Lee , Shirley L. Yu , Tzu-Jung Lin , Minjung Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High effort is critical to complete difficult introductory courses in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields. However, high effort can be negatively related to science self-concept (SC) as it can indicate a lack of brilliance in STEM. Further, this relation can be more pronounced for women due to gender stereotypes. To address gender differences in the relations between perceived effort and science SC, in this study, we measured two types of perceived effort: (1) <em>criterion effort</em> (the perception of trying hard) and (2) <em>comparative effort</em> (the perception of trying harder than others), and we examined possible gender differences in their correlates. Overall, we examined whether and to what extent reciprocal relations among two types of perceived effort, science SC, and achievement differ as a function of gender over the course of a semester in introductory chemistry. We utilized multiple-group latent cross-lagged panel analysis with undergraduate students (<em>N</em> = 690) in introductory chemistry courses in the U.S. Our findings indicate (a) positive roles of criterion effort for women, (b) negative roles of comparative effort for both genders, and (c) reciprocal relations between two types of perceived effort and achievement, which were more pronounced for women, in introductory chemistry. These findings suggest that promoting criterion effort and deemphasizing comparative effort will ultimately encourage science SC and success for both genders in STEM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 102349"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X25000141","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
High effort is critical to complete difficult introductory courses in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields. However, high effort can be negatively related to science self-concept (SC) as it can indicate a lack of brilliance in STEM. Further, this relation can be more pronounced for women due to gender stereotypes. To address gender differences in the relations between perceived effort and science SC, in this study, we measured two types of perceived effort: (1) criterion effort (the perception of trying hard) and (2) comparative effort (the perception of trying harder than others), and we examined possible gender differences in their correlates. Overall, we examined whether and to what extent reciprocal relations among two types of perceived effort, science SC, and achievement differ as a function of gender over the course of a semester in introductory chemistry. We utilized multiple-group latent cross-lagged panel analysis with undergraduate students (N = 690) in introductory chemistry courses in the U.S. Our findings indicate (a) positive roles of criterion effort for women, (b) negative roles of comparative effort for both genders, and (c) reciprocal relations between two types of perceived effort and achievement, which were more pronounced for women, in introductory chemistry. These findings suggest that promoting criterion effort and deemphasizing comparative effort will ultimately encourage science SC and success for both genders in STEM.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions.
The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.