Diagnostic performance of allele-specific RT-qPCR and genomic sequencing in wastewater-based surveillance of SARS-CoV-2

Md Pervez Kabir , Élisabeth Mercier , Walaa Eid , Julio Plaza-Diaz , Patrick M. D'Aoust , Chrystal Landgraff , Lawrence Goodridge , Opeyemi U. Lawal , Shen Wan , Nada Hegazy , Tram Nguyen , Chandler Wong , Ocean Thakali , Lakshmi Pisharody , Sean Stephenson , Tyson E. Graber , Robert Delatolla
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of allele-specific RT-qPCR and genomic sequencing in wastewater-based surveillance of SARS-CoV-2","authors":"Md Pervez Kabir ,&nbsp;Élisabeth Mercier ,&nbsp;Walaa Eid ,&nbsp;Julio Plaza-Diaz ,&nbsp;Patrick M. D'Aoust ,&nbsp;Chrystal Landgraff ,&nbsp;Lawrence Goodridge ,&nbsp;Opeyemi U. Lawal ,&nbsp;Shen Wan ,&nbsp;Nada Hegazy ,&nbsp;Tram Nguyen ,&nbsp;Chandler Wong ,&nbsp;Ocean Thakali ,&nbsp;Lakshmi Pisharody ,&nbsp;Sean Stephenson ,&nbsp;Tyson E. Graber ,&nbsp;Robert Delatolla","doi":"10.1016/j.eehl.2025.100135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Clinical genomic surveillance is regarded as the gold standard for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 variants globally. However, as the pandemic wanes, reduced testing poses a risk to effectively tracking the trajectory of these variants within populations. Wastewater-based genomic surveillance that estimates variant frequency based on its defining set of alleles derived from clinical genomic surveillance has been successfully implemented. This method has its challenges, and allele-specific (AS) RT-qPCR or RT-dPCR may instead be used as a complementary method for estimating variant prevalence. Demonstrating equivalent performance of these methods is a prerequisite for their continued application in current and future pandemics. Here, we compared single-allele frequency using AS-RT-qPCR, to single-allele or haplotype frequency estimations derived from amplicon-based sequencing to estimate variant prevalence in wastewater during emergent and prevalent periods of Delta, Omicron, and two sub-lineages of Omicron. We found that all three methods of frequency estimation were concordant and contained sufficient information to describe the trajectory of variant prevalence. We further confirmed the accuracy of these methods by quantifying the diagnostic performance through Youden's index. The Youden's index of AS-RT-qPCR was reduced during the low prevalence period of a particular variant while the same allele in sequencing was negatively influenced due to insufficient read depth. Youden's index of haplotype-based calls was negatively influenced when alleles were common between variants. Coupling AS-RT-qPCR with sequencing can overcome the shortcomings of either platform and provide a comprehensive picture to the stakeholders for public health responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29813,"journal":{"name":"Eco-Environment & Health","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eco-Environment & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772985025000043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical genomic surveillance is regarded as the gold standard for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 variants globally. However, as the pandemic wanes, reduced testing poses a risk to effectively tracking the trajectory of these variants within populations. Wastewater-based genomic surveillance that estimates variant frequency based on its defining set of alleles derived from clinical genomic surveillance has been successfully implemented. This method has its challenges, and allele-specific (AS) RT-qPCR or RT-dPCR may instead be used as a complementary method for estimating variant prevalence. Demonstrating equivalent performance of these methods is a prerequisite for their continued application in current and future pandemics. Here, we compared single-allele frequency using AS-RT-qPCR, to single-allele or haplotype frequency estimations derived from amplicon-based sequencing to estimate variant prevalence in wastewater during emergent and prevalent periods of Delta, Omicron, and two sub-lineages of Omicron. We found that all three methods of frequency estimation were concordant and contained sufficient information to describe the trajectory of variant prevalence. We further confirmed the accuracy of these methods by quantifying the diagnostic performance through Youden's index. The Youden's index of AS-RT-qPCR was reduced during the low prevalence period of a particular variant while the same allele in sequencing was negatively influenced due to insufficient read depth. Youden's index of haplotype-based calls was negatively influenced when alleles were common between variants. Coupling AS-RT-qPCR with sequencing can overcome the shortcomings of either platform and provide a comprehensive picture to the stakeholders for public health responses.

Abstract Image

等位基因特异性RT-qPCR和基因组测序在基于废水的SARS-CoV-2监测中的诊断价值
临床基因组监测被认为是全球监测SARS-CoV-2变异的金标准。然而,随着大流行的减弱,检测的减少对有效追踪人群中这些变异的轨迹构成了风险。基于废水的基因组监测已经成功实施,该监测基于临床基因组监测得出的等位基因的定义集来估计变异频率。这种方法有其挑战,等位基因特异性(AS) RT-qPCR或RT-dPCR可以作为估计变异流行率的补充方法。证明这些方法的同等性能是在当前和未来大流行病中继续应用这些方法的先决条件。在这里,我们使用AS-RT-qPCR将单等位基因频率与基于扩增子测序的单等位基因或单倍型频率进行比较,以估计Delta、Omicron和Omicron的两个亚谱系在突发性和流行期废水中的变异发生率。我们发现所有三种频率估计方法是一致的,并且包含足够的信息来描述变异流行的轨迹。我们通过约登指数对诊断性能进行量化,进一步证实了这些方法的准确性。AS-RT-qPCR的约登指数在特定变异的低流行期降低,而同一等位基因在测序中由于读取深度不足而受到负面影响。当等位基因在变体之间相同时,基于单倍型的呼叫的约登指数受到负向影响。将AS-RT-qPCR与测序相结合可以克服任一平台的缺点,并为公共卫生反应的利益攸关方提供全面的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eco-Environment & Health
Eco-Environment & Health 环境科学与生态学-生态、环境与健康
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Eco-Environment & Health (EEH) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal designed for publications on the frontiers of the ecology, environment and health as well as their related disciplines. EEH focuses on the concept of “One Health” to promote green and sustainable development, dealing with the interactions among ecology, environment and health, and the underlying mechanisms and interventions. Our mission is to be one of the most important flagship journals in the field of environmental health. Scopes EEH covers a variety of research areas, including but not limited to ecology and biodiversity conservation, environmental behaviors and bioprocesses of emerging contaminants, human exposure and health effects, and evaluation, management and regulation of environmental risks. The key topics of EEH include: 1) Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation Biodiversity Ecological restoration Ecological safety Protected area 2) Environmental and Biological Fate of Emerging Contaminants Environmental behaviors Environmental processes Environmental microbiology 3) Human Exposure and Health Effects Environmental toxicology Environmental epidemiology Environmental health risk Food safety 4) Evaluation, Management and Regulation of Environmental Risks Chemical safety Environmental policy Health policy Health economics Environmental remediation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信