{"title":"From traditional damage detection methods to Physics-Informed Machine Learning in bridges: A review","authors":"Safae Mammeri , Brais Barros , Borja Conde-Carnero , Belén Riveiro","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of bridges plays a crucial role in infrastructure management, ensuring the safety and durability of bridges under diverse operational and environmental conditions. A vital aspect of SHM involves Structural Damage Detection (SDD), which focuses on identifying, localizing, and quantifying structural damage such as cracks, corrosion, and other forms of deterioration. While traditional SDD methods, including physics-based and Machine Learning (ML) methods, are effective, they often tend to be challenging in addressing the complex and dynamic nature of bridge systems, particularly when dealing with limited or noisy data. Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) has emerged as a promising approach that integrates the strengths of ML with the reliability of physical constraints and principles, offering more accurate, robust interpretability and generalization capabilities, thereby strengthening the SHM framework. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution of SHM, from traditional SDD methods to the application of PIML. By analyzing key case studies and examining the strengths and limitations of each method, this review highlights the potential of PIML to address the challenges of real-world bridge monitoring and improve the early detection of structural damage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"330 ","pages":"Article 119862"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625002524","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of bridges plays a crucial role in infrastructure management, ensuring the safety and durability of bridges under diverse operational and environmental conditions. A vital aspect of SHM involves Structural Damage Detection (SDD), which focuses on identifying, localizing, and quantifying structural damage such as cracks, corrosion, and other forms of deterioration. While traditional SDD methods, including physics-based and Machine Learning (ML) methods, are effective, they often tend to be challenging in addressing the complex and dynamic nature of bridge systems, particularly when dealing with limited or noisy data. Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) has emerged as a promising approach that integrates the strengths of ML with the reliability of physical constraints and principles, offering more accurate, robust interpretability and generalization capabilities, thereby strengthening the SHM framework. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution of SHM, from traditional SDD methods to the application of PIML. By analyzing key case studies and examining the strengths and limitations of each method, this review highlights the potential of PIML to address the challenges of real-world bridge monitoring and improve the early detection of structural damage.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.