Epistemic racism in anti-doping research: A call for critical awareness

IF 2.9 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Jonathan Ruwuya , Byron Omwando Juma , Rekha Janarthanan , Jules Woolf
{"title":"Epistemic racism in anti-doping research: A call for critical awareness","authors":"Jonathan Ruwuya ,&nbsp;Byron Omwando Juma ,&nbsp;Rekha Janarthanan ,&nbsp;Jules Woolf","doi":"10.1016/j.peh.2024.100300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The anti-doping movement is presented with significant challenges, including high-profile inter-agency disputes, claims of inconsistent application of the WADA Code, institutionalized doping, and the emergence of doping-permissive movements. Amid these issues lies a less recognized yet crucial issue of epistemic racism, which can undermine global anti-doping initiatives. Epistemic racism, rooted in culturally biased systems of knowledge production, often privileges Western perspectives while relegating non-Western perspectives. Such bias can perpetuate racial stereotypes and affect anti-doping research and policy implementation. This Commentary explores the concept of epistemic racism, its manifestations, and strategies for mitigation within anti-doping research. A case example of a recent publication is presented to demonstrate how epistemic racism can go undetected and unchallenged, potentially reproducing and reinforcing outdated stereotypes. Overlooked, epistemic racism can have profound ramifications, including deterring aspiring scholars from developing countries, distorting anti-doping policies, and reinforcing racial stereotypes. To counteract this, it is essential to educate researchers on racial biases, adapt methodologies to reduce these biases and increase the inclusion and representation of scholars from developing countries in research and editorial roles. Such measures may foster a more inclusive research environment and directly inform practice, helping anti-doping research and practice become more critically aware.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19886,"journal":{"name":"Performance enhancement and health","volume":"13 1","pages":"Article 100300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Performance enhancement and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211266924000446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The anti-doping movement is presented with significant challenges, including high-profile inter-agency disputes, claims of inconsistent application of the WADA Code, institutionalized doping, and the emergence of doping-permissive movements. Amid these issues lies a less recognized yet crucial issue of epistemic racism, which can undermine global anti-doping initiatives. Epistemic racism, rooted in culturally biased systems of knowledge production, often privileges Western perspectives while relegating non-Western perspectives. Such bias can perpetuate racial stereotypes and affect anti-doping research and policy implementation. This Commentary explores the concept of epistemic racism, its manifestations, and strategies for mitigation within anti-doping research. A case example of a recent publication is presented to demonstrate how epistemic racism can go undetected and unchallenged, potentially reproducing and reinforcing outdated stereotypes. Overlooked, epistemic racism can have profound ramifications, including deterring aspiring scholars from developing countries, distorting anti-doping policies, and reinforcing racial stereotypes. To counteract this, it is essential to educate researchers on racial biases, adapt methodologies to reduce these biases and increase the inclusion and representation of scholars from developing countries in research and editorial roles. Such measures may foster a more inclusive research environment and directly inform practice, helping anti-doping research and practice become more critically aware.
反兴奋剂研究中的认识论种族主义:对批判意识的呼唤
反兴奋剂运动面临着重大挑战,包括备受瞩目的机构间争端、世界反兴奋剂机构规则不一致的说法、兴奋剂制度化以及兴奋剂纵容运动的出现。在这些问题中,有一个不太为人所知但却至关重要的认知种族主义问题,它可能会破坏全球反兴奋剂倡议。认识论上的种族主义,根植于文化偏见的知识生产系统,往往给予西方观点特权,而贬低非西方观点。这种偏见会使种族刻板印象永久化,影响反兴奋剂研究和政策实施。本评论探讨了认知种族主义的概念,其表现形式,以及在反兴奋剂研究中的缓解策略。本文以最近发表的一篇文章为例,展示了认知上的种族主义是如何不被发现和不受挑战的,它可能会再现和强化过时的刻板印象。如果被忽视,认知上的种族主义会产生深远的影响,包括阻碍发展中国家有抱负的学者,扭曲反兴奋剂政策,强化种族刻板印象。为了解决这个问题,必须对研究人员进行关于种族偏见的教育,调整方法以减少这些偏见,并增加发展中国家学者在研究和编辑角色中的包容性和代表性。这些措施可能会营造一个更具包容性的研究环境,并直接为实践提供信息,帮助反兴奋剂研究和实践变得更加批判性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Performance enhancement and health
Performance enhancement and health Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信