Barriers to online library instruction in academic libraries: A qualitative study

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Rebeca Peacock
{"title":"Barriers to online library instruction in academic libraries: A qualitative study","authors":"Rebeca Peacock","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Online learning has greatly influenced higher education. In response many academic libraries have expanded their online instruction programs to improve information literacy in multiple learning environments. The barriers that limit the ability of academic librarians to deliver online instruction effectively are examined in this study, using semi-structured interviews with 18 participants who have considerable experience in academic librarianship and instructional design. Barriers are revealed, such as limited institutional support, resource constraints, pervasive negative attitudes toward both online learning as well as library instruction, insufficient student motivation, and inadequate professional preparation. These barriers signify longstanding issues—such as the undervaluation of librarians' educational roles and the lack of pedagogical training in library science curricula. However, changes in the higher education landscape, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, have raised the urgency for planned responses. This research draws attention to the fact that, if the barriers that limit effective delivery of online instruction by academic librarians are going to be reduced, institutional investment has a key role; professional development opportunities need to be increased, and important curriculum in library science programs need to be reformed. Active advocacy that legitimizes and advances online library instruction will be an essential component of academic librarianship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 2","pages":"Article 103021"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133325000175","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online learning has greatly influenced higher education. In response many academic libraries have expanded their online instruction programs to improve information literacy in multiple learning environments. The barriers that limit the ability of academic librarians to deliver online instruction effectively are examined in this study, using semi-structured interviews with 18 participants who have considerable experience in academic librarianship and instructional design. Barriers are revealed, such as limited institutional support, resource constraints, pervasive negative attitudes toward both online learning as well as library instruction, insufficient student motivation, and inadequate professional preparation. These barriers signify longstanding issues—such as the undervaluation of librarians' educational roles and the lack of pedagogical training in library science curricula. However, changes in the higher education landscape, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, have raised the urgency for planned responses. This research draws attention to the fact that, if the barriers that limit effective delivery of online instruction by academic librarians are going to be reduced, institutional investment has a key role; professional development opportunities need to be increased, and important curriculum in library science programs need to be reformed. Active advocacy that legitimizes and advances online library instruction will be an essential component of academic librarianship.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信