Assessing the impact of soil use and management systems on soil health in Southern Brazil

IF 3.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Regiane Kazmierczak Becker , Carolina Weigert Galvão , Rafael Mazer Etto , Daiane Hyeda , Ariane Lentice de Paula , Luis Miguel Schiebelbein , Neyde Fabíola Balarezo Giarola
{"title":"Assessing the impact of soil use and management systems on soil health in Southern Brazil","authors":"Regiane Kazmierczak Becker ,&nbsp;Carolina Weigert Galvão ,&nbsp;Rafael Mazer Etto ,&nbsp;Daiane Hyeda ,&nbsp;Ariane Lentice de Paula ,&nbsp;Luis Miguel Schiebelbein ,&nbsp;Neyde Fabíola Balarezo Giarola","doi":"10.1016/j.geodrs.2025.e00932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing demand for adopting more sustainable agricultural management practices worldwide has prompted soil health assessment studies. In southern Brazil, there is a growing diversification in soil use and management systems. This study aimed to evaluate soil health under different soil use and management systems in this region using the Soil Management Assessment Framework. The study investigated secondary forest, no-tillage, and pasture across three mesoregions of Paraná State: West, Southwest, and Central East. Soil health was evaluated in the surface layer, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess the effect of soil use and management on soil health. Scores for bulk density, water-filled pore space, pH, phosphorus, potassium, microbial biomass carbon, and β-glucosidase activity were sensitive to detecting changes in soil conditions. However, other indicators, such as macroaggregate stability and total organic carbon, need refined algorithms for regional adaptation. Differences in soil health among soil use and management were observed. Secondary forest generally maintained optimal soil health indices, with values above 0.86. No-tillage showed good soil health indices in the evaluated layer, with values above 0.80. Notably, no-tillage with organic agricultural systems and the application of organic residues appeared to contribute positively to soil health improvement, with indices reaching 0.86 and 0.89, respectively. Pastures, especially silvopasture, showed potential for improving soil health through plant diversity, achieving an index of 0.88. We suggest that future studies compare different soil health indices to improve algorithms for interpreting soil health indicators on a regional scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56001,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma Regional","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article e00932"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma Regional","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352009425000173","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing demand for adopting more sustainable agricultural management practices worldwide has prompted soil health assessment studies. In southern Brazil, there is a growing diversification in soil use and management systems. This study aimed to evaluate soil health under different soil use and management systems in this region using the Soil Management Assessment Framework. The study investigated secondary forest, no-tillage, and pasture across three mesoregions of Paraná State: West, Southwest, and Central East. Soil health was evaluated in the surface layer, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess the effect of soil use and management on soil health. Scores for bulk density, water-filled pore space, pH, phosphorus, potassium, microbial biomass carbon, and β-glucosidase activity were sensitive to detecting changes in soil conditions. However, other indicators, such as macroaggregate stability and total organic carbon, need refined algorithms for regional adaptation. Differences in soil health among soil use and management were observed. Secondary forest generally maintained optimal soil health indices, with values above 0.86. No-tillage showed good soil health indices in the evaluated layer, with values above 0.80. Notably, no-tillage with organic agricultural systems and the application of organic residues appeared to contribute positively to soil health improvement, with indices reaching 0.86 and 0.89, respectively. Pastures, especially silvopasture, showed potential for improving soil health through plant diversity, achieving an index of 0.88. We suggest that future studies compare different soil health indices to improve algorithms for interpreting soil health indicators on a regional scale.
评估巴西南部土壤利用和管理系统对土壤健康的影响
世界范围内对采用更可持续的农业管理方法的需求日益增长,这促使了土壤健康评估研究。在巴西南部,土壤利用和管理系统日益多样化。本研究旨在利用土壤管理评价框架对该地区不同土壤利用与管理制度下的土壤健康状况进行评价。该研究调查了帕拉纳州中部三个地区:西部、西南和中东部的次生林、免耕和牧场。在表层评价土壤健康,采用Kruskal-Wallis试验评价土壤利用与管理对土壤健康的影响。容重、充水孔隙空间、pH、磷、钾、微生物生物量碳和β-葡萄糖苷酶活性得分对检测土壤条件的变化敏感。然而,其他指标,如宏观团聚体稳定性和总有机碳,需要改进算法以适应区域。不同土壤利用方式和管理方式对土壤健康的影响存在差异。次生林土壤健康指数总体保持最优,均在0.86以上。免耕评价层土壤健康指数较好,均在0.80以上。值得注意的是,免耕有机农业系统和施用有机残留物对土壤健康改善有积极的贡献,指数分别达到0.86和0.89。牧草,尤其是林草,具有通过植物多样性改善土壤健康的潜力,指数为0.88。我们建议未来的研究比较不同的土壤健康指数,以改进在区域尺度上解释土壤健康指标的算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma Regional
Geoderma Regional Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Global issues require studies and solutions on national and regional levels. Geoderma Regional focuses on studies that increase understanding and advance our scientific knowledge of soils in all regions of the world. The journal embraces every aspect of soil science and welcomes reviews of regional progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信