Understanding Nursing Backwards: The Evolution of Nursing as a Profession.

Denise J Drevdahl, Mary K Canales
{"title":"Understanding Nursing Backwards: The Evolution of Nursing as a Profession.","authors":"Denise J Drevdahl, Mary K Canales","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20241004-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Becoming a profession, attaining professionalism, and transmitting a professional identity have been ongoing projects within nursing since the 1860s. To gain an understanding of nursing's attention on these three processes, the authors examined them from the context of self-regulation, a key hallmark of professionalism.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Historical understandings of self-regulatory processes associated with nursing organizational representation, education standards, and regulatory requirements were traced. Mapping these understandings involved searching the literature and websites to outline historical events aligned with formation of professional nursing organizations for education, practice, and regulation, including accreditation and licensure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Past opportunities for nursing professional organizations to coordinate and collaborate with respect to self-regulation were missed such that fragmentation exists and persists within the discipline, with multiple organizations overseeing numerous professional and self-regulatory standards and processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different paths need to be taken to create a future that better serves the discipline and meets its public obligations. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2025;64(2):99-108.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":"64 2","pages":"99-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20241004-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Becoming a profession, attaining professionalism, and transmitting a professional identity have been ongoing projects within nursing since the 1860s. To gain an understanding of nursing's attention on these three processes, the authors examined them from the context of self-regulation, a key hallmark of professionalism.

Method: Historical understandings of self-regulatory processes associated with nursing organizational representation, education standards, and regulatory requirements were traced. Mapping these understandings involved searching the literature and websites to outline historical events aligned with formation of professional nursing organizations for education, practice, and regulation, including accreditation and licensure.

Results: Past opportunities for nursing professional organizations to coordinate and collaborate with respect to self-regulation were missed such that fragmentation exists and persists within the discipline, with multiple organizations overseeing numerous professional and self-regulatory standards and processes.

Conclusion: Different paths need to be taken to create a future that better serves the discipline and meets its public obligations. [J Nurs Educ. 2025;64(2):99-108.].

逆向理解护理:护理专业的演变。
背景:自19世纪60年代以来,成为一种职业,获得专业精神,并传播职业身份一直是护理领域的持续项目。为了了解护理对这三个过程的关注,作者从自我调节的背景下检查了它们,这是专业精神的关键标志。方法:追溯与护理组织代表、教育标准和监管要求相关的自我监管过程的历史理解。绘制这些理解包括搜索文献和网站,概述与专业护理组织的教育、实践和监管(包括认证和许可)形成一致的历史事件。结果:过去护理专业组织在自我监管方面进行协调和合作的机会被错过,以至于学科内部存在并持续存在碎片化,多个组织监督众多专业和自我监管标准和流程。结论:需要采取不同的路径来创造一个更好地为学科服务并履行其公共义务的未来。[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2015;32(2):393 - 398。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信