[EMERGING THERAPIES FOR LI-FRAUMENI SYNDROME AND RHABDOMYOSARCOMA: CAN CHAT GPT ASSESS THE THERAPIES IT SUGGESTS USING THE BRADFORD-HILL CRITERIA?]

Harefuah Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Rotem Sisso-Avron, Or Degany, Sharon Einav
{"title":"[EMERGING THERAPIES FOR LI-FRAUMENI SYNDROME AND RHABDOMYOSARCOMA: CAN CHAT GPT ASSESS THE THERAPIES IT SUGGESTS USING THE BRADFORD-HILL CRITERIA?]","authors":"Rotem Sisso-Avron, Or Degany, Sharon Einav","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Li-Fraumeni syndrome is a rare genetic disorder caused by a mutation in the TP53 gene. The syndrome is characterized by a variety of malignancies that manifest in early childhood. In this article, we present a young patient diagnosed with Li-Fraumeni syndrome following recurrent rhabdomyosarcoma. A personalized literature search was performed to identify novel therapeutics that may be appropriate for this patient. In the absence of randomized, double-blind studies, the relevance of each potential treatment was evaluated using the Bradford-Hill criteria. These criteria underlie the medical logic used for assessing causation. This case was then used to explore the ability of the large language model ChatGPT to conduct a similar review and assess its treatment suggestions using the Bradford-Hill criteria. In-depth exploration suggested that ChatGPT treatment suggestions based solely on the presentation of the case and a general question are insufficiently informative. Targeted prompts (instructions for structuring the response, formulated as questions) lead to the generation of more accurate and clinically useful model responses but these, too, should be approached with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":101459,"journal":{"name":"Harefuah","volume":"164 1","pages":"4-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harefuah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Li-Fraumeni syndrome is a rare genetic disorder caused by a mutation in the TP53 gene. The syndrome is characterized by a variety of malignancies that manifest in early childhood. In this article, we present a young patient diagnosed with Li-Fraumeni syndrome following recurrent rhabdomyosarcoma. A personalized literature search was performed to identify novel therapeutics that may be appropriate for this patient. In the absence of randomized, double-blind studies, the relevance of each potential treatment was evaluated using the Bradford-Hill criteria. These criteria underlie the medical logic used for assessing causation. This case was then used to explore the ability of the large language model ChatGPT to conduct a similar review and assess its treatment suggestions using the Bradford-Hill criteria. In-depth exploration suggested that ChatGPT treatment suggestions based solely on the presentation of the case and a general question are insufficiently informative. Targeted prompts (instructions for structuring the response, formulated as questions) lead to the generation of more accurate and clinically useful model responses but these, too, should be approached with caution.

[李-弗劳米尼综合征和横纹肌肉瘤的新疗法:聊天GPT能否使用布拉德福德-希尔标准评估其建议的疗法?]
Li-Fraumeni综合征是一种罕见的遗传性疾病,由TP53基因突变引起。该综合征的特点是在儿童早期表现出各种恶性肿瘤。在这篇文章中,我们提出了一个年轻的患者诊断为Li-Fraumeni综合征后复发横纹肌肉瘤。进行了个性化的文献检索,以确定可能适合该患者的新疗法。在没有随机双盲研究的情况下,使用Bradford-Hill标准评估每种潜在治疗的相关性。这些标准是用于评估因果关系的医学逻辑的基础。然后,这个案例被用来探索大型语言模型ChatGPT进行类似审查的能力,并使用Bradford-Hill标准评估其治疗建议。深入研究表明,仅仅基于病例陈述和一般性问题的ChatGPT治疗建议信息不足。有针对性的提示(构建反应的说明,以问题的形式表述)导致产生更准确和临床有用的模型反应,但这些也应该谨慎对待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信