Faculty Perceptions of an Accessibility Initiative for Enhancing Student Success in Nursing Education.

Asma A Taha, Justi Echeles, Aaron M Eisen, Kathryn Vaughn, Lina Gomma, Najood Azar
{"title":"Faculty Perceptions of an Accessibility Initiative for Enhancing Student Success in Nursing Education.","authors":"Asma A Taha, Justi Echeles, Aaron M Eisen, Kathryn Vaughn, Lina Gomma, Najood Azar","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20241029-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This quality improvement project evaluated the effectiveness, barriers, and perceived student effects of an accessibility initiative, including Universal Design for Learning, from faculty perspectives across a school of nursing's five campuses in the Pacific Northwest.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional design was used for this study. Eighty faculty completed a survey with quantitative and qualitative components. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Faculty found the training and resources useful, improving their knowledge and confidence in designing accessible online and hybrid courses. Barriers often were time-related, with faculty struggling to allocate time to attend training sessions and create digitally accessible content. Student feedback and faculty perceptions illustrated how accessible design supports the diverse needs of students with disabilities and fosters better learning experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the effectiveness of accessible design to support the success of all nursing students to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in nursing practice. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2025;64(X):XXX-XXX.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20241029-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This quality improvement project evaluated the effectiveness, barriers, and perceived student effects of an accessibility initiative, including Universal Design for Learning, from faculty perspectives across a school of nursing's five campuses in the Pacific Northwest.

Method: A descriptive cross-sectional design was used for this study. Eighty faculty completed a survey with quantitative and qualitative components. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

Results: Faculty found the training and resources useful, improving their knowledge and confidence in designing accessible online and hybrid courses. Barriers often were time-related, with faculty struggling to allocate time to attend training sessions and create digitally accessible content. Student feedback and faculty perceptions illustrated how accessible design supports the diverse needs of students with disabilities and fosters better learning experiences.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the effectiveness of accessible design to support the success of all nursing students to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in nursing practice. [J Nurs Educ. 2025;64(X):XXX-XXX.].

背景:本质量改进项目从西北太平洋地区一所护理学院五个校区的教师角度出发,评估了无障碍举措(包括通用学习设计)的有效性、障碍和学生感知效果:本研究采用描述性横断面设计。八十名教师完成了一项包含定量和定性内容的调查。采用描述性统计和主题分析法对数据进行了分析:教师们认为培训和资源非常有用,提高了他们设计无障碍在线课程和混合课程的知识和信心。障碍往往与时间有关,教师们难以分配时间参加培训课程和创建数字化无障碍内容。学生的反馈和教师的看法说明了无障碍设计是如何支持残疾学生的不同需求并促进更好的学习体验的:这些发现强调了无障碍设计在支持所有护理专业学生取得成功,促进护理实践的多样性、公平性和包容性方面的有效性。[J Nurs Educ. 2025;64(X):XXX-XXX.].
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信