Reducing clinical target volume margins for multifocal glioblastoma: a multi-institutional analysis of patterns of recurrence and treatment response.

Francesco Marampon, Giovanni Luca Gravina, Elisa Cinelli, Lucy Zaccaro, Miriam Tomaciello, Nunzia Di Meglio, Francesco Gentili, Alfonso Cerase, Armando Perrella, Mariya Yavorska, Sami Aburas, Luciano Mutti, Maria Antonietta Mazzei, Giuseppe Minniti, Paolo Tini
{"title":"Reducing clinical target volume margins for multifocal glioblastoma: a multi-institutional analysis of patterns of recurrence and treatment response.","authors":"Francesco Marampon, Giovanni Luca Gravina, Elisa Cinelli, Lucy Zaccaro, Miriam Tomaciello, Nunzia Di Meglio, Francesco Gentili, Alfonso Cerase, Armando Perrella, Mariya Yavorska, Sami Aburas, Luciano Mutti, Maria Antonietta Mazzei, Giuseppe Minniti, Paolo Tini","doi":"10.3857/roj.2024.00059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>No guidelines exist to delineate radiation therapy (RT) targets for the treatment of multiple glioblastoma (mGBM). This study analyzes margins around the gross tumor volume (GTV) to create a clinical target volume (CTV), comparing response parameters and modalities of recurrence.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>One-hundred and three mGBM patients with a CTV margin of 2 cm (GTV + 2.0 cm) or 1 cm (GTV + 1.0 cm) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received a total dose of 59.4-60 Gy in 1.8-2.0 Gy daily fractions, delivered from 4 to 8 weeks after surgery, concomitantly with temozolomide (75 mg/m2). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated from the date of surgery until diagnosis of disease progression performed by magnetic resonance imaging and classified as marginal, in-field, or distant, comparing site of progression with dose distribution in RT plan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OS in mGBM CTV1 group was 11.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.3-12.1), and 9.2 months in mGBM CTV2 group (95% CI, 9.0-11.3). PFS in mGBM CTV1 group occurred within 8.3 months (95% CI, 7.3-9.3), and 7.3 months in mGBM CTV2 group (95% CI, 6.4-8.1). No difference was observed between the two groups in terms of OS and PFS time distribution. Adjusted to a multivariate Cox risk model, epidermal growth factor receptor amplification resulted a negative prognostic factor for both OS and PFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In mGBM, the use of a 1 cm CTV expansion seems feasible as it does not significantly affect oncological outcomes and progression outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":94184,"journal":{"name":"Radiation oncology journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation oncology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2024.00059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: No guidelines exist to delineate radiation therapy (RT) targets for the treatment of multiple glioblastoma (mGBM). This study analyzes margins around the gross tumor volume (GTV) to create a clinical target volume (CTV), comparing response parameters and modalities of recurrence.

Material and methods: One-hundred and three mGBM patients with a CTV margin of 2 cm (GTV + 2.0 cm) or 1 cm (GTV + 1.0 cm) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received a total dose of 59.4-60 Gy in 1.8-2.0 Gy daily fractions, delivered from 4 to 8 weeks after surgery, concomitantly with temozolomide (75 mg/m2). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated from the date of surgery until diagnosis of disease progression performed by magnetic resonance imaging and classified as marginal, in-field, or distant, comparing site of progression with dose distribution in RT plan.

Results: OS in mGBM CTV1 group was 11.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.3-12.1), and 9.2 months in mGBM CTV2 group (95% CI, 9.0-11.3). PFS in mGBM CTV1 group occurred within 8.3 months (95% CI, 7.3-9.3), and 7.3 months in mGBM CTV2 group (95% CI, 6.4-8.1). No difference was observed between the two groups in terms of OS and PFS time distribution. Adjusted to a multivariate Cox risk model, epidermal growth factor receptor amplification resulted a negative prognostic factor for both OS and PFS.

Conclusion: In mGBM, the use of a 1 cm CTV expansion seems feasible as it does not significantly affect oncological outcomes and progression outcome.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信