Long-term Home Mechanical Ventilation of Children in İstanbul.

IF 0.6 0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Mürüvvet Yanaz, Füsun Ünal, Evrim Hepkaya, Hakan Yazan, Sinem Can Oksay, Ebru Köstereli, Cansu Yılmaz Yeğit, Azer Kılıç Başkan, Zeynep Reyhan Onay, Aynur Gulieva, Aslınur Soyyiğit, Mine Kalyoncu, Hanife Büşra Küçük, Yetkin Ayhan, Almala Pınar Ergenekon, Emine Atağ, Selçuk Uzuner, Nilay Baş İkizoğlu, Ayşe Ayzıt Kılınç, Pınar Ay, Ela Erdem Eralp, Sedat Öktem, Erkan Çakır, Saniye Girit, Zeynep Seda Uyan, Haluk Çokuğraş, Refika Ersu, Bülent Karadağ, Fazilet Karakoç
{"title":"Long-term Home Mechanical Ventilation of Children in İstanbul.","authors":"Mürüvvet Yanaz, Füsun Ünal, Evrim Hepkaya, Hakan Yazan, Sinem Can Oksay, Ebru Köstereli, Cansu Yılmaz Yeğit, Azer Kılıç Başkan, Zeynep Reyhan Onay, Aynur Gulieva, Aslınur Soyyiğit, Mine Kalyoncu, Hanife Büşra Küçük, Yetkin Ayhan, Almala Pınar Ergenekon, Emine Atağ, Selçuk Uzuner, Nilay Baş İkizoğlu, Ayşe Ayzıt Kılınç, Pınar Ay, Ela Erdem Eralp, Sedat Öktem, Erkan Çakır, Saniye Girit, Zeynep Seda Uyan, Haluk Çokuğraş, Refika Ersu, Bülent Karadağ, Fazilet Karakoç","doi":"10.4274/ThoracResPract.2024.24042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this multi-center study were to describe the characteristics of children receiving long-term home mechanical ventilation (HMV) in İstanbul and to compare the patients receiving non-invasive and invasive ventilation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional multicenter study included all children receiving long-term HMV followed by admission to six tertiary hospitals. The data were collected between May 2020 and May 2021. Demographic data and data regarding HMV were collected from the patient charts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 416 participants. The most common diagnoses were neuromuscular (35.1%) and neurological diseases (25.7%). Among the patients, 49.5% (n = 206) received non-invasive ventilation (NIV), whereas 50.5% (n = 210) received invasive ventilation. The median age at initiation was significantly younger in the invasive ventilation group than in the NIV group (10 vs. 41 months, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Most subjects in the NIV group (81.1%) received ventilation support only during sleep, whereas most subjects in the invasive ventilation group (55.7%) received continuous ventilator support (<i>P</i> < 0.001). In addition to ventilation support, 41.9% of the subjects in the invasive ventilation group and 28.6% in the NIV group received oxygen supplementation (<i>P</i> = 0.002). Within the last year, 59.1% (n = 246) of the subjects were hospitalized. The risk factors for hospitalization were invasive ventilation, continuous ventilatory support, oxygen supplementation, tube feeding, and swallowing dysfunction (<i>P</i> = 0.002, 0.009, <0.001, <0.001 and <0.001 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the increasing use of NIV in most studies, half of the study population received invasive ventilation. Patients receiving invasive ventilation were more likely to require continuous ventilator support and oxygen supplementation and were at increased risk of hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":"26 1","pages":"25-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11785001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ThoracResPract.2024.24042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aims of this multi-center study were to describe the characteristics of children receiving long-term home mechanical ventilation (HMV) in İstanbul and to compare the patients receiving non-invasive and invasive ventilation.

Material and methods: This cross-sectional multicenter study included all children receiving long-term HMV followed by admission to six tertiary hospitals. The data were collected between May 2020 and May 2021. Demographic data and data regarding HMV were collected from the patient charts.

Results: The study included 416 participants. The most common diagnoses were neuromuscular (35.1%) and neurological diseases (25.7%). Among the patients, 49.5% (n = 206) received non-invasive ventilation (NIV), whereas 50.5% (n = 210) received invasive ventilation. The median age at initiation was significantly younger in the invasive ventilation group than in the NIV group (10 vs. 41 months, P < 0.001). Most subjects in the NIV group (81.1%) received ventilation support only during sleep, whereas most subjects in the invasive ventilation group (55.7%) received continuous ventilator support (P < 0.001). In addition to ventilation support, 41.9% of the subjects in the invasive ventilation group and 28.6% in the NIV group received oxygen supplementation (P = 0.002). Within the last year, 59.1% (n = 246) of the subjects were hospitalized. The risk factors for hospitalization were invasive ventilation, continuous ventilatory support, oxygen supplementation, tube feeding, and swallowing dysfunction (P = 0.002, 0.009, <0.001, <0.001 and <0.001 respectively).

Conclusion: Despite the increasing use of NIV in most studies, half of the study population received invasive ventilation. Patients receiving invasive ventilation were more likely to require continuous ventilator support and oxygen supplementation and were at increased risk of hospitalization.

儿童长期家庭机械通气İstanbul。
目的:本多中心研究的目的是描述İstanbul儿童长期家用机械通气(HMV)的特点,并比较无创和有创通气患者。材料和方法:本横断面多中心研究纳入了所有长期接受HMV治疗的儿童,并在6家三级医院住院。这些数据是在2020年5月至2021年5月期间收集的。从患者图表中收集人口统计数据和有关HMV的数据。结果:共纳入416名受试者。最常见的诊断是神经肌肉疾病(35.1%)和神经系统疾病(25.7%)。无创通气206例(49.5%),有创通气210例(50.5%)。有创通气组的起始年龄中位数明显小于无创通气组(10个月vs 41个月,P < 0.001)。无创通气组绝大多数(81.1%)仅在睡眠时接受通气支持,而有创通气组绝大多数(55.7%)接受持续呼吸机支持(P < 0.001)。除通气支持外,41.9%的有创通气组和28.6%的无创通气组患者接受了补氧(P = 0.002)。在过去一年中,59.1% (n = 246)的受试者住院治疗。住院的危险因素为有创通气、持续通气支持、补氧、管饲、吞咽功能障碍(P = 0.002, 0.009)。结论:尽管大多数研究中NIV的使用越来越多,但仍有一半的研究人群接受了有创通气。接受有创通气的患者更有可能需要持续呼吸机支持和补充氧气,并且住院的风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信