Match Accuracy of Burned Teeth: A pilot study of allied dental professionals.

Q2 Dentistry
Brenda T Bradshaw, Marsha A Voelker, Samantha C Vest, Sinjini Sikdar
{"title":"Match Accuracy of Burned Teeth: A pilot study of allied dental professionals.","authors":"Brenda T Bradshaw, Marsha A Voelker, Samantha C Vest, Sinjini Sikdar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> The purpose of this pilot study was to assess allied dental professionals' match accuracy of burned teeth; a skill required by disaster victim identification (DVI) team members.<b>Methods</b> This cross-sectional study used a convenience sample of registered dental hygienists (RDH) (n=15) and dental assistants (DA) (n=15) to assess their match accuracy of burned teeth with simulated antemortem (AM) and postmortem (PM) images. Fifteen human teeth were heated at 400°C for 15 minutes. Prior to and following heat alteration, each tooth was photographed and radiographed. Images were presented to participants in randomized order, and they were instructed to correctly match them with the teeth. Each participant completed 60 matches for the 15 teeth with 1 set of pre- and post-burned photographs and 1 pre- and post-burned periapical (PA) radiographs. Following the match accuracy activity, participants completed an electronic questionnaire to report demographic data and indicate their perceptions of performed tasks.<b>Results</b> A one-sided one-sample binomial proportion test revealed that on average, participants demonstrated more than 80% match accuracy of the teeth with AM and PM images (<i>p</i>=0.0003). When compared by profession, the average match accuracy was 82.1% for RDHs and 72.7% for DAs. A two-sided two-sample binomial proportion test revealed no statistically significant difference of performance between the professions (<i>p</i>=0.8505). A one-sided linear trend test indicated no significant association between match accuracy and years of work experience (<i>p</i>=0.2371).<b>Conclusion</b> On average, participants demonstrated the ability to transfer professional skills to match burned teeth with simulated AM and PM images. Differences in professional background and years of work experience did not have a significant impact. More research is needed to best understand allied dental professionals' transferrable DVI skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":52471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","volume":"99 1","pages":"32-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this pilot study was to assess allied dental professionals' match accuracy of burned teeth; a skill required by disaster victim identification (DVI) team members.Methods This cross-sectional study used a convenience sample of registered dental hygienists (RDH) (n=15) and dental assistants (DA) (n=15) to assess their match accuracy of burned teeth with simulated antemortem (AM) and postmortem (PM) images. Fifteen human teeth were heated at 400°C for 15 minutes. Prior to and following heat alteration, each tooth was photographed and radiographed. Images were presented to participants in randomized order, and they were instructed to correctly match them with the teeth. Each participant completed 60 matches for the 15 teeth with 1 set of pre- and post-burned photographs and 1 pre- and post-burned periapical (PA) radiographs. Following the match accuracy activity, participants completed an electronic questionnaire to report demographic data and indicate their perceptions of performed tasks.Results A one-sided one-sample binomial proportion test revealed that on average, participants demonstrated more than 80% match accuracy of the teeth with AM and PM images (p=0.0003). When compared by profession, the average match accuracy was 82.1% for RDHs and 72.7% for DAs. A two-sided two-sample binomial proportion test revealed no statistically significant difference of performance between the professions (p=0.8505). A one-sided linear trend test indicated no significant association between match accuracy and years of work experience (p=0.2371).Conclusion On average, participants demonstrated the ability to transfer professional skills to match burned teeth with simulated AM and PM images. Differences in professional background and years of work experience did not have a significant impact. More research is needed to best understand allied dental professionals' transferrable DVI skills.

烧伤牙齿的匹配准确性:联合牙科专业人员的试点研究。
目的本初步研究的目的是评估专职牙医对烧伤牙齿的匹配准确性;这是灾难受害者识别(DVI)团队成员所需的技能。方法采用方便样本,注册牙科保健员(RDH) (n=15)和牙科助理(DA) (n=15),评估他们对模拟死前(AM)和死后(PM)图像对烧伤牙齿的匹配准确性。15颗人牙在400°C下加热15分钟。在热改造前后,对每颗牙齿进行拍照和x光检查。研究人员按随机顺序向参与者展示图像,并指示他们正确地将图像与牙齿匹配起来。每位参与者完成了15颗牙齿的60次配牙,并拍摄了1组烧伤前和烧伤后的照片以及1组烧伤前和烧伤后的根尖周x光片。在匹配准确性活动之后,参与者完成了一份电子问卷,以报告人口统计数据并表明他们对执行任务的看法。结果单侧单样本二项比例检验显示,平均而言,参与者对AM和PM图像的匹配准确率超过80% (p=0.0003)。按专业进行比较,RDHs的平均匹配准确率为82.1%,da的平均匹配准确率为72.7%。双侧双样本二项比例检验显示,各专业之间的绩效差异无统计学意义(p=0.8505)。单侧线性趋势检验显示匹配精度与工作经验年数无显著相关性(p=0.2371)。平均而言,参与者展示了将专业技能与模拟AM和PM图像匹配烧伤牙齿的能力。专业背景和工作年限的差异没有显著影响。需要更多的研究来最好地了解牙科专业人员可转移的DVI技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Hygiene is the refereed, scientific publication of the American Dental Hygienists’ Association. It promotes the publication of original research related to the practice and education of dental hygiene. It supports the development and dissemination of a dental hygiene body of knowledge through scientific inquiry in basic, applied, and clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信