A Mixed-Methods Study Examining Guideline-Concordant Colposcopy Practices Among a National Cohort of US Colposcopists.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1097/LGT.0000000000000876
Rebecca B Perkins, Lindsay Fuzzell, Naomi C Brownstein, Holly B Fontenot, Alexandra Michel, Marena Neggers, Paige Lake, Susan T Vadaparampil
{"title":"A Mixed-Methods Study Examining Guideline-Concordant Colposcopy Practices Among a National Cohort of US Colposcopists.","authors":"Rebecca B Perkins, Lindsay Fuzzell, Naomi C Brownstein, Holly B Fontenot, Alexandra Michel, Marena Neggers, Paige Lake, Susan T Vadaparampil","doi":"10.1097/LGT.0000000000000876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The 2017 ASCCP Colposcopy Standards guidelines were designed to maximize the diagnostic yield of colposcopy. However, guideline adoption is often slow, and few studies have examined management of patients undergoing colposcopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To elucidate factors associated with utilization of the 2017 ASCCP Colposcopy Standards guidelines for patients undergoing colposcopic cervical biopsy, the authors cross-sectionally surveyed and interviewed physicians and advanced practice providers who perform colposcopy. Clinicians responded to a clinical vignette describing a common colposcopy scenario. Clinicians were asked to describe where they would biopsy and why. Binomial logistic regression models determined factors associated with guideline concordance. Qualitative interviews further explored practice patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 671 colposcopists participated from across the United States. A total of 541 (81%) participants reported colposcopy practice concordant with the 2017 ASCCP Colposcopy Standards guidelines. A total of 490 (73%) participants reported that they were using the 2017 ASCCP Colposcopy Standards guidelines. Male colposcopists and those who were internal and family medicine clinicians were less likely to report guideline-concordant management than females and obstetrician-gynecologists. Colposcopists discussed the rationale behind guideline-concordant aspects of care, including taking targeted biopsies and using excisional rather than ablation procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most colposcopists perform biopsies and treatment consistent with the 2017 ASCCP Colposcopy Standards guidelines and understand the rationale behind multiple targeted biopsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","volume":" ","pages":"161-167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000876","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The 2017 ASCCP Colposcopy Standards guidelines were designed to maximize the diagnostic yield of colposcopy. However, guideline adoption is often slow, and few studies have examined management of patients undergoing colposcopy.

Methods: To elucidate factors associated with utilization of the 2017 ASCCP Colposcopy Standards guidelines for patients undergoing colposcopic cervical biopsy, the authors cross-sectionally surveyed and interviewed physicians and advanced practice providers who perform colposcopy. Clinicians responded to a clinical vignette describing a common colposcopy scenario. Clinicians were asked to describe where they would biopsy and why. Binomial logistic regression models determined factors associated with guideline concordance. Qualitative interviews further explored practice patterns.

Results: A total of 671 colposcopists participated from across the United States. A total of 541 (81%) participants reported colposcopy practice concordant with the 2017 ASCCP Colposcopy Standards guidelines. A total of 490 (73%) participants reported that they were using the 2017 ASCCP Colposcopy Standards guidelines. Male colposcopists and those who were internal and family medicine clinicians were less likely to report guideline-concordant management than females and obstetrician-gynecologists. Colposcopists discussed the rationale behind guideline-concordant aspects of care, including taking targeted biopsies and using excisional rather than ablation procedures.

Conclusions: Most colposcopists perform biopsies and treatment consistent with the 2017 ASCCP Colposcopy Standards guidelines and understand the rationale behind multiple targeted biopsies.

一项在美国阴道镜医师全国队列中检查指南一致阴道镜实践的混合方法研究。
目的:2017年ASCCP阴道镜标准指南旨在最大限度地提高阴道镜的诊断率。然而,指南的采用往往是缓慢的,很少有研究检查了阴道镜检查患者的管理。方法:为了阐明在接受阴道镜宫颈活检的患者中使用2017年ASCCP阴道镜标准指南的相关因素,我们对进行阴道镜检查的医生和高级执业医师进行了横断面调查和访谈。临床医生对一篇描述常见阴道镜检查场景的临床小短文做出了回应。临床医生被要求描述他们将在哪里进行活检以及原因。二项逻辑回归模型确定了与指南一致性相关的因素。定性访谈进一步探讨了实践模式。结果:全美共有671名阴道镜专家参与。共有541名(81%)参与者报告阴道镜实践符合2017年ASCCP阴道镜标准指南。共有490名(73%)参与者报告说他们使用了2017年ASCCP阴道镜标准指南。与女性和妇产科医生相比,男性阴道镜医生和内科和家庭医学临床医生报告指南一致性管理的可能性更小。阴道镜专家讨论了与指南一致的护理背后的基本原理,包括采取有针对性的活组织检查和使用切除而不是消融手术。结论:大多数阴道镜检查师按照2017年ASCCP阴道镜检查标准指南进行活检和治疗,并了解多目标活检背后的原理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the source for the latest science about benign and malignant conditions of the cervix, vagina, vulva, and anus. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original research original research that addresses prevalence, causes, mechanisms, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of lower genital tract disease. We publish clinical guidelines, position papers, cost-effectiveness analyses, narrative reviews, and systematic reviews, including meta-analyses. We also publish papers about research and reporting methods, opinions about controversial medical issues. Of particular note, we encourage material in any of the above mentioned categories that is related to improving patient care, avoiding medical errors, and comparative effectiveness research. We encourage publication of evidence-based guidelines, diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, and decision aids. Original research and reviews may be sub-classified according to topic: cervix and HPV, vulva and vagina, perianal and anal, basic science, and education and learning. The scope and readership of the journal extend to several disciplines: gynecology, internal medicine, family practice, dermatology, physical therapy, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, sex therapy, and pharmacology. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease highlights needs for future research, and enhances health care. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the official journal of the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease, and the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy, and sponsored by the Australian Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and the Society of Canadian Colposcopists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信