Connecting Power Types and Leadership Approaches in Academia Can Enhance Our Influence and Maximize Impact.

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Tonya Jackson, Miriam Purnell, David Fuentes, Jeremy A Hughes
{"title":"Connecting Power Types and Leadership Approaches in Academia Can Enhance Our Influence and Maximize Impact.","authors":"Tonya Jackson, Miriam Purnell, David Fuentes, Jeremy A Hughes","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Power types are systems of influence leaders can use when faced with an opportunity or challenge; thus, power types can be viewed as tools in the leader's toolbox. Each tool has a unique purpose and can be used based on the situation at hand. Just like individual strengths, leadership styles, and preferences can vary among leaders, no one power type is better or worse than another. Whereas there is substantial discussion about leadership styles and personality preferences in the academic pharmacy literature, little is present regarding the use of power types in higher education administration, and even less in health professions education administration. Leaders across the academy can benefit from understanding how to exert influence from the various power type approaches, regardless of whether they hold formal administrative positions or are influencing and leading without formal leadership titles. This commentary focuses on identifying approaches to power, as distinct from leadership styles, and calls on both individual leaders and the Academy to integrate power types and power dynamics more coherently into conversations about leadership and leadership approaches. Like leadership styles and strengths, power types can be helpful in times when leaders are at their best and can work against leaders in times of stress. Understanding more about power types, and their benefits and drawbacks, can help leaders at all levels better use their power, express their voice, and influence in their locus of control.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101368"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Power types are systems of influence leaders can use when faced with an opportunity or challenge; thus, power types can be viewed as tools in the leader's toolbox. Each tool has a unique purpose and can be used based on the situation at hand. Just like individual strengths, leadership styles, and preferences can vary among leaders, no one power type is better or worse than another. Whereas there is substantial discussion about leadership styles and personality preferences in the academic pharmacy literature, little is present regarding the use of power types in higher education administration, and even less in health professions education administration. Leaders across the academy can benefit from understanding how to exert influence from the various power type approaches, regardless of whether they hold formal administrative positions or are influencing and leading without formal leadership titles. This commentary focuses on identifying approaches to power, as distinct from leadership styles, and calls on both individual leaders and the Academy to integrate power types and power dynamics more coherently into conversations about leadership and leadership approaches. Like leadership styles and strengths, power types can be helpful in times when leaders are at their best and can work against leaders in times of stress. Understanding more about power types, and their benefits and drawbacks, can help leaders at all levels better use their power, express their voice, and influence in their locus of control.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信