Social cohesion and COVID-19 mortality in different periods of the pandemic: variable efficacy of trust in civil services.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ying-Chih Chuang, Rong-Xian Chen, Hsueh-Wen Hsu, Peng-Hua Lee
{"title":"Social cohesion and COVID-19 mortality in different periods of the pandemic: variable efficacy of trust in civil services.","authors":"Ying-Chih Chuang, Rong-Xian Chen, Hsueh-Wen Hsu, Peng-Hua Lee","doi":"10.1177/14034948251314082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Social cohesion has been reported to influence various health outcomes positively. However, inconsistent results were reported regarding the effects of social cohesion dimensions on the COVID-19 mortality rate (MR). Most studies have indicated that trust in civil services but not participating in social activities reduces COVID-19 mortality, possibly because of the highly contagious nature of this disease. In this study, we investigated how the effects of various dimensions of social cohesion on COVID-19 MR vary across different phases of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used data from 86 countries participating in the 2017-2020 World Values Survey. The measures of social cohesion were identified by aggregating responses to the country level. COVID-19 MR was calculated-using data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control-separately for three distinct periods during the pandemic: 13 January 2020-8 November 2020; 9 November 2020-5 September 2021; and 6 September 2021-20 June 2022. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify the dimensions of social cohesion, and negative binomial regression models were constructed to analyze data for each period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EFA results revealed three dimensions of social cohesion: social participation and inclusion, health service equality, and trust in civil services and democracy. COVID-19 MR was negatively associated with trust in civil services and democracy during the early two periods and with social participation and inclusion during the late period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <b>Each social cohesion dimension uniquely contributed to reducing the COVID-19 MR in different pandemic periods.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"14034948251314082"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948251314082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Social cohesion has been reported to influence various health outcomes positively. However, inconsistent results were reported regarding the effects of social cohesion dimensions on the COVID-19 mortality rate (MR). Most studies have indicated that trust in civil services but not participating in social activities reduces COVID-19 mortality, possibly because of the highly contagious nature of this disease. In this study, we investigated how the effects of various dimensions of social cohesion on COVID-19 MR vary across different phases of the pandemic.

Methods: This study used data from 86 countries participating in the 2017-2020 World Values Survey. The measures of social cohesion were identified by aggregating responses to the country level. COVID-19 MR was calculated-using data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control-separately for three distinct periods during the pandemic: 13 January 2020-8 November 2020; 9 November 2020-5 September 2021; and 6 September 2021-20 June 2022. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify the dimensions of social cohesion, and negative binomial regression models were constructed to analyze data for each period.

Results: The EFA results revealed three dimensions of social cohesion: social participation and inclusion, health service equality, and trust in civil services and democracy. COVID-19 MR was negatively associated with trust in civil services and democracy during the early two periods and with social participation and inclusion during the late period.

Conclusions: Each social cohesion dimension uniquely contributed to reducing the COVID-19 MR in different pandemic periods.

大流行不同时期的社会凝聚力和COVID-19死亡率:对公务员信任的不同效力
目的:据报道,社会凝聚力对各种健康结果产生积极影响。然而,关于社会凝聚力维度对COVID-19死亡率(MR)的影响,报告的结果不一致。大多数研究表明,信任公务员但不参加社会活动可以降低COVID-19死亡率,这可能是因为这种疾病的高度传染性。在本研究中,我们调查了社会凝聚力的各个方面对COVID-19 MR的影响在大流行的不同阶段如何变化。方法:本研究使用了参与2017-2020年世界价值观调查的86个国家的数据。通过汇总国家一级的答复确定了社会凝聚力的措施。使用欧洲疾病预防和控制中心的数据,在大流行期间的三个不同时期分别计算了COVID-19 MR: 2020年1月13日至2020年11月8日;2020年11月9日- 2021年9月5日;2021年9月6日至2022年6月20日。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)确定社会凝聚力的维度,并构建负二项回归模型对每个时期的数据进行分析。结果:全民教育结果揭示了社会凝聚力的三个维度:社会参与和包容、卫生服务平等以及对公务员制度和民主的信任。在前两个阶段,COVID-19 - MR与对公务员制度和民主的信任呈负相关,在后两个阶段与社会参与和包容呈负相关。结论:在不同的大流行时期,每个社会凝聚力维度都对降低COVID-19 MR有独特的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信