How Do University Students Navigate Distress? An Examination of Determinants, Coping Strategies, and Support Systems Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Daniel Hernández-Torrano, Laura Ibrayeva
{"title":"How Do University Students Navigate Distress? An Examination of Determinants, Coping Strategies, and Support Systems Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory.","authors":"Daniel Hernández-Torrano, Laura Ibrayeva","doi":"10.1177/10497323251315430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Entrance to university is marked by significant changes and challenges that can impact mental health and well-being. This study investigated the determinants of psychological distress, coping strategies used, and the availability of support systems among university students in a non-Western country through the lenses of self-determination theory. The thematic analysis of 16 in-depth interviews revealed several academic, socio-demographic, and situational factors crucial in facilitating or impeding university students' sense of self-determination and, consequently, their psychological distress. The study uncovered students' relative preference for avoidance coping mechanisms, the limited presence of perceived formal support systems in higher education institutions, and a clear reliance of students on informal sources of support to buffer the effects of distress. Moreover, it was evident that students perceived their higher education settings as leaning toward being controlling rather than autonomy-supportive. Implications for promoting well-being among university students are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251315430"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251315430","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Entrance to university is marked by significant changes and challenges that can impact mental health and well-being. This study investigated the determinants of psychological distress, coping strategies used, and the availability of support systems among university students in a non-Western country through the lenses of self-determination theory. The thematic analysis of 16 in-depth interviews revealed several academic, socio-demographic, and situational factors crucial in facilitating or impeding university students' sense of self-determination and, consequently, their psychological distress. The study uncovered students' relative preference for avoidance coping mechanisms, the limited presence of perceived formal support systems in higher education institutions, and a clear reliance of students on informal sources of support to buffer the effects of distress. Moreover, it was evident that students perceived their higher education settings as leaning toward being controlling rather than autonomy-supportive. Implications for promoting well-being among university students are discussed.

大学生如何应对压力?从自我决定理论的角度审视决定因素、应对策略和支持系统。
进入大学的标志是重大的变化和挑战,可能会影响心理健康和福祉。本研究以自我决定理论为视角,探讨了非西方国家大学生心理困扰的决定因素、应对策略和支持系统的可用性。对16个深度访谈的专题分析揭示了几个学术、社会人口和情境因素,这些因素对促进或阻碍大学生的自决意识至关重要,因此,他们的心理困扰。该研究揭示了学生对回避应对机制的相对偏好,高等教育机构中公认的正式支持系统的有限存在,以及学生对非正式支持来源的明显依赖,以缓冲痛苦的影响。此外,很明显,学生们认为他们的高等教育环境倾向于控制,而不是自主支持。讨论了促进大学生幸福感的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信