Care bundles for women during pregnancy, labour/birth, and postpartum: a scoping review.

HRB open research Pub Date : 2024-06-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/hrbopenres.13905.1
Theo Ryan, Tess McGrinder, Valerie Smith
{"title":"Care bundles for women during pregnancy, labour/birth, and postpartum: a scoping review.","authors":"Theo Ryan, Tess McGrinder, Valerie Smith","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13905.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Care bundles, introduced in 2001, are described as a set of at least three evidence-based healthcare interventions delivered together in a clinical care episode by all healthcare providers. Although widely implemented in some healthcare areas, care bundle use in maternity care appears relatively recent. To identify the types of care bundles that have been developed, evaluated, or implemented for women during the perinatal period, we undertook a scoping review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance for scoping reviews was used. MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Maternity and Infant Care, and Epistemonikos were searched from January 2000 to October 2023. Records that reported on women during pregnancy and up to six-weeks postpartum as the intended or actual recipients of a care bundle, were included. The concept of interest was development, evaluation, or implementation of a care bundle. The context was maternity care provision, in any setting or geographical location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 147 eligible records of which 69 originated in the USA. Most records were concerned with care bundle evaluation (n=74), and most were published in the last five-years (n=95). Eleven categories of clinical conditions were identified. These were surgical site infection, obstetric haemorrhage, perineal trauma, sepsis, stillbirth, hypertension, safe reduction of caesarean section, enhanced recovery after caesarean, placenta accrete, perinatal anxiety/depression, and 'other' which contained 21 records reporting on care bundles for one clinical condition. Few clinical conditions had good overlap of care bundle elements. Systematic reviews based on data from non-randomised studies may be feasible for some clinical conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review provides comprehensive insight on care bundles in maternity care. Few studies were found that evaluated the effectiveness of these bundles, and many bundles for similar clinical conditions contained diverse elements. A more global approach to care bundle development, evaluation, and implementation in maternity care is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"7 ","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13905.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Care bundles, introduced in 2001, are described as a set of at least three evidence-based healthcare interventions delivered together in a clinical care episode by all healthcare providers. Although widely implemented in some healthcare areas, care bundle use in maternity care appears relatively recent. To identify the types of care bundles that have been developed, evaluated, or implemented for women during the perinatal period, we undertook a scoping review.

Methods: Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance for scoping reviews was used. MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Maternity and Infant Care, and Epistemonikos were searched from January 2000 to October 2023. Records that reported on women during pregnancy and up to six-weeks postpartum as the intended or actual recipients of a care bundle, were included. The concept of interest was development, evaluation, or implementation of a care bundle. The context was maternity care provision, in any setting or geographical location.

Results: The search yielded 147 eligible records of which 69 originated in the USA. Most records were concerned with care bundle evaluation (n=74), and most were published in the last five-years (n=95). Eleven categories of clinical conditions were identified. These were surgical site infection, obstetric haemorrhage, perineal trauma, sepsis, stillbirth, hypertension, safe reduction of caesarean section, enhanced recovery after caesarean, placenta accrete, perinatal anxiety/depression, and 'other' which contained 21 records reporting on care bundles for one clinical condition. Few clinical conditions had good overlap of care bundle elements. Systematic reviews based on data from non-randomised studies may be feasible for some clinical conditions.

Conclusions: This scoping review provides comprehensive insight on care bundles in maternity care. Few studies were found that evaluated the effectiveness of these bundles, and many bundles for similar clinical conditions contained diverse elements. A more global approach to care bundle development, evaluation, and implementation in maternity care is recommended.

针对孕期、分娩/生产和产后妇女的护理包:范围界定审查。
背景:护理包于2001年推出,被描述为一组至少三种循证医疗保健干预措施,由所有医疗保健提供者在临床护理事件中一起提供。尽管在一些卫生保健领域得到了广泛实施,但在产妇保健中使用护理包的时间相对较短。为了确定已开发、评估或实施的围产期妇女护理包的类型,我们进行了范围审查。方法:采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法指南进行范围审查。检索自2000年1月至2023年10月的MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase、妇幼保健和Epistemonikos。报告了怀孕期间和产后六周内的妇女作为护理包的预期或实际接受者的记录。感兴趣的概念是护理包的开发、评估或实现。其背景是在任何环境或地理位置提供产妇保健。结果:检索得到147条符合条件的记录,其中69条来自美国。大多数记录与护理包评估有关(n=74),大多数是在最近5年内发表的(n=95)。确定了11类临床状况。这些包括手术部位感染、产科出血、会阴创伤、败血症、死产、高血压、安全减少剖腹产、剖腹产后恢复增强、胎盘增生、围产期焦虑/抑郁和“其他”,其中包含21份关于一种临床状况护理包的记录。很少有临床条件有良好的重叠护理包要素。基于非随机研究数据的系统评价对于某些临床条件可能是可行的。结论:这一范围审查提供了全面的洞察护理包在产妇护理。很少有研究发现评估这些药物束的有效性,许多类似临床条件的药物束包含不同的元素。建议采取一种更加全球化的方法来制定、评估和实施孕产妇保健护理包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信