Assessment of PAP Device Usage and COVID-19 Related Anxiety in Patients with OSAS During COVID-19 Pandemics

0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Thoracic research and practice Pub Date : 2025-04-30 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.24029
Gulin Sunter, Humay Ismayilzade, Beyza Arslan, Ezgi Vural, Baran Balcan, Kadriye Agan
{"title":"Assessment of PAP Device Usage and COVID-19 Related Anxiety in Patients with OSAS During COVID-19 Pandemics","authors":"Gulin Sunter, Humay Ismayilzade, Beyza Arslan, Ezgi Vural, Baran Balcan, Kadriye Agan","doi":"10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.24029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to determine the positive airway pressure (PAP) device usage and pandemic-related anxiety in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Five hundred twenty-seven OSAS patients were recruited into the study. A questionnaire consisting of 7 questions was filled to find out their Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-related anxiety levels and PAP device usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 53.3 years (±11.9). One hundred forty-one 141 (27%) of the participants were female and 382 (73%) were male. Two hundred sixteen (41%) patients reported using the PAP device regularly [PAP (+) group); 307 (59%) patients reported not using it at all or using it irregularly (PAP (-) group]. Forty-nine (23%) PAP (+) patients and 91 (29%) PAP (-) patients had COVID-19. The use of a PAP device was not significantly associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 infection (<i>P</i> = 0.077). The most common symptom was myalgia without a between-group difference, (<i>P</i> = 0.967). There was no significant difference between the PAP (+) and PAP (-) groups in the hospitalization rates for COVID-19 (<i>P</i> = 0.252). The presence of apnea was not considered as a cause of a higher level of COVID-19-related anxiety in patients with the PAP (+) group compared to the PAP (-) group (<i>P</i> = 0.095).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no evidence that the use of PAP devices in OSAS patients influenced the risk of getting COVID-19 and the clinical course of the disease. PAP device usage did not affect the level of anxiety associated with the pandemic in patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":" ","pages":"132-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12047191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.24029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to determine the positive airway pressure (PAP) device usage and pandemic-related anxiety in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients during the pandemic.

Material and methods: Five hundred twenty-seven OSAS patients were recruited into the study. A questionnaire consisting of 7 questions was filled to find out their Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-related anxiety levels and PAP device usage.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 53.3 years (±11.9). One hundred forty-one 141 (27%) of the participants were female and 382 (73%) were male. Two hundred sixteen (41%) patients reported using the PAP device regularly [PAP (+) group); 307 (59%) patients reported not using it at all or using it irregularly (PAP (-) group]. Forty-nine (23%) PAP (+) patients and 91 (29%) PAP (-) patients had COVID-19. The use of a PAP device was not significantly associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 infection (P = 0.077). The most common symptom was myalgia without a between-group difference, (P = 0.967). There was no significant difference between the PAP (+) and PAP (-) groups in the hospitalization rates for COVID-19 (P = 0.252). The presence of apnea was not considered as a cause of a higher level of COVID-19-related anxiety in patients with the PAP (+) group compared to the PAP (-) group (P = 0.095).

Conclusion: There was no evidence that the use of PAP devices in OSAS patients influenced the risk of getting COVID-19 and the clinical course of the disease. PAP device usage did not affect the level of anxiety associated with the pandemic in patients.

COVID-19大流行期间OSAS患者PAP设备使用和COVID-19相关焦虑的评估
目的:在本研究中,我们旨在确定大流行期间阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)患者气道正压通气(PAP)设备的使用情况和与大流行相关的焦虑。材料和方法:527例OSAS患者被纳入研究。填写了一份由7个问题组成的问卷,以了解他们与冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关的焦虑水平和PAP设备的使用情况。结果:患者平均年龄53.3岁(±11.9岁)。其中14141人(27%)为女性,382人(73%)为男性。216例(41%)患者报告定期使用PAP设备[PAP(+)组];307例(59%)患者报告完全不使用或不定期使用(PAP(-)组)。49例(23%)PAP(+)患者和91例(29%)PAP(-)患者合并了COVID-19。PAP设备的使用与COVID-19感染风险的增加无显著相关(P = 0.077)。最常见的症状为肌痛,组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.967)。PAP(+)组与PAP(-)组COVID-19住院率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.252)。与PAP(-)组相比,PAP(+)组患者的covid -19相关焦虑水平较高,呼吸暂停的存在不被认为是原因(P = 0.095)。结论:没有证据表明osaas患者使用PAP设备对感染COVID-19的风险和临床病程有影响。PAP设备的使用不影响患者与大流行相关的焦虑水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信