From intellectual imperialism to open system: Reassessing the "Americanization" of social psychology through Festinger's frustration with the SSRC's project on transnational social psychology.
{"title":"From intellectual imperialism to open system: Reassessing the \"Americanization\" of social psychology through Festinger's frustration with the SSRC's project on transnational social psychology.","authors":"Verena Lehmbrock","doi":"10.1037/hop0000274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article investigates the development of social psychology post-World War II through the lens of the Committee on Transnational Social Psychology, established in 1963 under the American Social Science Research Council (SSRC) and led by American psychologist Leon Festinger. Initially envisioned as a vehicle for globalizing U.S. experimental social psychology, the Committee aimed to create research hubs worldwide with similarly trained psychologists. However, Festinger's growing dissatisfaction with the Committee's trajectory around 1970 underscores significant challenges to its original objectives. Based on a close reading of archival files and documents from the SSRC and related sources, this article explores these challenges and questions overly simplistic \"imperial\" interpretations of U.S. philanthropic research funding. It argues that the SSRC's influence, particularly its emphasis on intellectual and personal diversity, played a crucial role in counteracting any straightforward \"Americanization.\" Facilitating the assimilation of different intellectual traditions, European key figures, such as Moscovici, benefited from the SSRC's support and influence, which helped them to gain prominence and shape the Committee's direction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"73-91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article investigates the development of social psychology post-World War II through the lens of the Committee on Transnational Social Psychology, established in 1963 under the American Social Science Research Council (SSRC) and led by American psychologist Leon Festinger. Initially envisioned as a vehicle for globalizing U.S. experimental social psychology, the Committee aimed to create research hubs worldwide with similarly trained psychologists. However, Festinger's growing dissatisfaction with the Committee's trajectory around 1970 underscores significant challenges to its original objectives. Based on a close reading of archival files and documents from the SSRC and related sources, this article explores these challenges and questions overly simplistic "imperial" interpretations of U.S. philanthropic research funding. It argues that the SSRC's influence, particularly its emphasis on intellectual and personal diversity, played a crucial role in counteracting any straightforward "Americanization." Facilitating the assimilation of different intellectual traditions, European key figures, such as Moscovici, benefited from the SSRC's support and influence, which helped them to gain prominence and shape the Committee's direction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
本文通过跨国社会心理学委员会(Committee on Transnational social psychology)的视角来考察二战后社会心理学的发展。该委员会成立于1963年,隶属于美国社会科学研究委员会(SSRC),由美国心理学家Leon Festinger领导。该委员会最初被设想为美国实验社会心理学全球化的载体,其目标是在全球范围内建立由同样受过训练的心理学家组成的研究中心。然而,费斯廷格对委员会1970年前后的发展轨迹越来越不满,这凸显了委员会最初目标面临的重大挑战。本文通过仔细阅读SSRC的档案文件和相关资料,探讨了这些挑战和对美国慈善研究经费过于简单化的“帝国主义”解释的质疑。它认为,SSRC的影响,特别是它对智力和个人多样性的强调,在抵制任何直接的“美国化”方面发挥了至关重要的作用。为了促进不同知识传统的融合,莫斯科维奇等欧洲关键人物从社会科学研究中心的支持和影响中受益,这有助于他们获得突出地位并影响委员会的方向。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
期刊介绍:
History of Psychology features refereed articles addressing all aspects of psychology"s past and of its interrelationship with the many contexts within which it has emerged and has been practiced. It also publishes scholarly work in closely related areas, such as historical psychology (the history of consciousness and behavior), psychohistory, theory in psychology as it pertains to history, historiography, biography and autobiography, and the teaching of the history of psychology.