Effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on the recovery of hospitalized burn patients: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Elahe Ghadimi, Roozbeh Rahbar, Elham Jafarzade, Anahita Mansoori
{"title":"Effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on the recovery of hospitalized burn patients: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.","authors":"Elahe Ghadimi, Roozbeh Rahbar, Elham Jafarzade, Anahita Mansoori","doi":"10.1186/s40795-025-01024-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burn patients, due to their damaged skin, may not be able to synthesize vitamin D. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of vitamin D supplementation on the recovery of hospitalized burn patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-four patients participated in a randomized controlled trial. Eighteen patients were randomly assigned to group C (control, received gelatin soft gel as placebo), 18 patients to group D<sub>1</sub> (received 1000 IU/day vitamin D), and 18 patients to group D<sub>2</sub> (received 3000 IU/day vitamin D). After supplementation, wound biopsy and blood samples were obtained from the patients. Weight, height, 25(OH)D level, wound healing, scar formation, quality of pain, and blood parameters were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the serum vitamin D levels between the groups at admission (P = 0.52), and 81.5% of the participants were deficient, with a noteworthy increase during study in supplemented groups (P < 0.001). The Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool demonstrated significant differences in wound healing between the C group and the D<sub>1</sub> and D<sub>2</sub> groups (P = 0.003), and the supplemented groups experienced greater improvement. The D<sub>2</sub> group showed significant differences in thickness and total score on the Vancouver scar scale up to three months after discharge (P = 0.03). Moreover, there was a notable decrease in insulin requirements and the number of injected insulin units in the supplemented groups compared with those in group C (P = 0.006 and P = 0.01, respectively). In addition, shorter hospitalization was observed in group D<sub>2</sub> (P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Supplementation with vitamin D at doses of 1000 and 3000 IU/day improved wound healing and decreased scar thickness as well as exogenous insulin requirements. Overall, at 3000 IU/day, better results were achieved than at 1000 IU/day.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This article is registered in 24/04/2020 on the Iranian Randomized Clinical Trials Registry (trial registration number (IRCT, code: IRCT20200420047141N1.</p>","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"11 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-025-01024-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Burn patients, due to their damaged skin, may not be able to synthesize vitamin D. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of vitamin D supplementation on the recovery of hospitalized burn patients.

Methods: Fifty-four patients participated in a randomized controlled trial. Eighteen patients were randomly assigned to group C (control, received gelatin soft gel as placebo), 18 patients to group D1 (received 1000 IU/day vitamin D), and 18 patients to group D2 (received 3000 IU/day vitamin D). After supplementation, wound biopsy and blood samples were obtained from the patients. Weight, height, 25(OH)D level, wound healing, scar formation, quality of pain, and blood parameters were evaluated.

Results: There were no significant differences in the serum vitamin D levels between the groups at admission (P = 0.52), and 81.5% of the participants were deficient, with a noteworthy increase during study in supplemented groups (P < 0.001). The Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool demonstrated significant differences in wound healing between the C group and the D1 and D2 groups (P = 0.003), and the supplemented groups experienced greater improvement. The D2 group showed significant differences in thickness and total score on the Vancouver scar scale up to three months after discharge (P = 0.03). Moreover, there was a notable decrease in insulin requirements and the number of injected insulin units in the supplemented groups compared with those in group C (P = 0.006 and P = 0.01, respectively). In addition, shorter hospitalization was observed in group D2 (P = 0.04).

Conclusion: Supplementation with vitamin D at doses of 1000 and 3000 IU/day improved wound healing and decreased scar thickness as well as exogenous insulin requirements. Overall, at 3000 IU/day, better results were achieved than at 1000 IU/day.

Trial registration: This article is registered in 24/04/2020 on the Iranian Randomized Clinical Trials Registry (trial registration number (IRCT, code: IRCT20200420047141N1.

补充维生素D3对住院烧伤患者康复的影响:一项随机双盲对照试验。
背景:烧伤患者由于皮肤受损,可能无法合成维生素D。在本研究中,我们旨在评估补充维生素D对住院烧伤患者康复的影响。方法:54例患者参加随机对照试验。将18例患者随机分为C组(对照组,服用明胶软凝胶作为安慰剂),D1组18例(服用1000 IU/ D维生素D), D2组18例(服用3000 IU/ D维生素D),补充后对患者进行伤口活检和血液取样。评估体重、身高、25(OH)D水平、伤口愈合、疤痕形成、疼痛质量和血液参数。结果:两组患者入院时血清维生素D水平差异无统计学意义(P = 0.52), 81.5%的受试者缺乏维生素D,研究期间补充组(P 1和D2组)明显增加(P = 0.003),且补充组改善更大。D2组在温哥华疤痕量表上的厚度和总评分在出院后3个月有显著差异(P = 0.03)。此外,与C组相比,补充组的胰岛素需要量和注射胰岛素单位数均显著降低(P = 0.006和P = 0.01)。D2组住院时间较D2组短(P = 0.04)。结论:补充1000和3000 IU/天剂量的维生素D可促进伤口愈合,减少疤痕厚度和外源性胰岛素需求。总的来说,服用3000 IU/天比服用1000 IU/天效果更好。本文注册于2020年4月24日在伊朗随机临床试验注册中心(试验注册号:IRCT,代码:IRCT20200420047141N1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信