Da Jung Jung, Jigon Son, Ha Gyung Kwon, Eunhye Kwon, Kyu-Yup Lee
{"title":"Efficacy of ossiculoplasty in patients with chronic otitis media with severe to profound hearing loss.","authors":"Da Jung Jung, Jigon Son, Ha Gyung Kwon, Eunhye Kwon, Kyu-Yup Lee","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-84966-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic otitis media (COM) is treated medically and/or surgically. Ossiculoplasty for COM with severe-to-profound hearing loss has not been recommended because the severity of hearing loss before surgery is negatively associated with postoperative hearing improvement. Our study assessed the effectiveness of ossiculoplasty for severe-to-profound hearing loss and identified prognostic factors associated with favorable outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 182 patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss who underwent ossiculoplasty with tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy for COM between January 2017 and December 2018. Air conduction, bone conduction, and air-bone gap significantly improved compared to baseline values. Univariate analysis revealed that high ossiculoplasty outcome parameter staging (OOPS) or middle ear risk index (MERI) scores, obstructed Eustachian tube status, or computed tomography (CT) findings with sclerotic mastoid or soft tissue density (STD) of the retrotympanic space were associated with a lower odds ratio for air gain ≥ 20 dB at 12 months postoperatively. Multivariate analysis revealed that a high OOPS score and obstructed Eustachian tube significantly predicted poorer outcomes. In conclusion, ossiculoplasty can be considered for selected patients with COM, such as those with a low OOPS index, aerated middle ear, or no STD of the retrotympanic space on CT, before cochlear implantation even if they had severe-to-profound hearing loss and high bone conduction threshold.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"4974"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84966-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chronic otitis media (COM) is treated medically and/or surgically. Ossiculoplasty for COM with severe-to-profound hearing loss has not been recommended because the severity of hearing loss before surgery is negatively associated with postoperative hearing improvement. Our study assessed the effectiveness of ossiculoplasty for severe-to-profound hearing loss and identified prognostic factors associated with favorable outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 182 patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss who underwent ossiculoplasty with tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy for COM between January 2017 and December 2018. Air conduction, bone conduction, and air-bone gap significantly improved compared to baseline values. Univariate analysis revealed that high ossiculoplasty outcome parameter staging (OOPS) or middle ear risk index (MERI) scores, obstructed Eustachian tube status, or computed tomography (CT) findings with sclerotic mastoid or soft tissue density (STD) of the retrotympanic space were associated with a lower odds ratio for air gain ≥ 20 dB at 12 months postoperatively. Multivariate analysis revealed that a high OOPS score and obstructed Eustachian tube significantly predicted poorer outcomes. In conclusion, ossiculoplasty can be considered for selected patients with COM, such as those with a low OOPS index, aerated middle ear, or no STD of the retrotympanic space on CT, before cochlear implantation even if they had severe-to-profound hearing loss and high bone conduction threshold.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.