Cauda equina movements during the Valsalva maneuver in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: introducing a novel method for redundant nerve evaluations.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Ryo Yamakuni, Shiro Ishii, Koji Otani, Shinya Seino, Takuya Nikaido, Kazuyuki Watanabe, Kinshi Kato, Hiroshi Kobayashi, Masataka Nakamura, Takeyasu Kakamu, Hironobu Ishikawa, Hirofumi Sekino, Kenji Fukushima, Yoshihiro Matsumoto, Hiroshi Ito
{"title":"Cauda equina movements during the Valsalva maneuver in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: introducing a novel method for redundant nerve evaluations.","authors":"Ryo Yamakuni, Shiro Ishii, Koji Otani, Shinya Seino, Takuya Nikaido, Kazuyuki Watanabe, Kinshi Kato, Hiroshi Kobayashi, Masataka Nakamura, Takeyasu Kakamu, Hironobu Ishikawa, Hirofumi Sekino, Kenji Fukushima, Yoshihiro Matsumoto, Hiroshi Ito","doi":"10.1007/s00256-025-04888-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether inchworm-like cauda equina movements can be observed in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis using a novel Valsalva maneuver cine MRI (cMRI) protocol.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifteen lumbar spinal stenosis patients (11 males; mean age, 73.9 years) underwent lumbar static MRI (sMRI) and sagittal 60-s cMRI. The cMRI protocol, called the Kinematic Assessment of Redundant Nerves (KAoRN), included three resting and Valsalva maneuver sets. Two radiologists independently evaluated cauda equina movement and lumbar spinal stenosis severity from L1/2 to L5/S1 using an MRI lumbar spinal stenosis score. Scores from both analysts were averaged; the most severe averaged score from all levels was extracted and defined as the worst score. Moreover, the level at which severe stenosis (averaged score ≥ 3.5) was observed was counted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>KAoRN-positive cauda equina movement was observed in 11 participants (73.3%). KAoRN-negative participants tended to have non-significantly higher worst lumbar spinal stenosis scores (4.0, interquartile range 3.9-4.0) than those of KAoRN-positive participants (3.5, interquartile range 3.0-4.0) (p = 0.310, χ<sup>2</sup> test). KAoRN-negative participants tended to have more severe stenosis than that of KAoRN-positive participants, though the difference was not significant (p = 0.182, Wilcoxon rank sum test).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>KAoRN-positive cauda equina movement is frequently observed in participants with lumbar spinal stenosis; however, it is not observed in all such cases. Further exploration of the differences in the presence or absence of KAoRN-positive findings may provide new insights into the diagnosis of clinically relevant LSS requiring surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Trail registration: </strong>The UMIN clinical trial number: UMIN000052276.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-025-04888-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether inchworm-like cauda equina movements can be observed in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis using a novel Valsalva maneuver cine MRI (cMRI) protocol.

Materials and methods: Fifteen lumbar spinal stenosis patients (11 males; mean age, 73.9 years) underwent lumbar static MRI (sMRI) and sagittal 60-s cMRI. The cMRI protocol, called the Kinematic Assessment of Redundant Nerves (KAoRN), included three resting and Valsalva maneuver sets. Two radiologists independently evaluated cauda equina movement and lumbar spinal stenosis severity from L1/2 to L5/S1 using an MRI lumbar spinal stenosis score. Scores from both analysts were averaged; the most severe averaged score from all levels was extracted and defined as the worst score. Moreover, the level at which severe stenosis (averaged score ≥ 3.5) was observed was counted.

Results: KAoRN-positive cauda equina movement was observed in 11 participants (73.3%). KAoRN-negative participants tended to have non-significantly higher worst lumbar spinal stenosis scores (4.0, interquartile range 3.9-4.0) than those of KAoRN-positive participants (3.5, interquartile range 3.0-4.0) (p = 0.310, χ2 test). KAoRN-negative participants tended to have more severe stenosis than that of KAoRN-positive participants, though the difference was not significant (p = 0.182, Wilcoxon rank sum test).

Conclusion: KAoRN-positive cauda equina movement is frequently observed in participants with lumbar spinal stenosis; however, it is not observed in all such cases. Further exploration of the differences in the presence or absence of KAoRN-positive findings may provide new insights into the diagnosis of clinically relevant LSS requiring surgical intervention.

Trail registration: The UMIN clinical trial number: UMIN000052276.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Skeletal Radiology
Skeletal Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
253
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Skeletal Radiology provides a forum for the dissemination of current knowledge and information dealing with disorders of the musculoskeletal system including the spine. While emphasizing the radiological aspects of the many varied skeletal abnormalities, the journal also adopts an interdisciplinary approach, reflecting the membership of the International Skeletal Society. Thus, the anatomical, pathological, physiological, clinical, metabolic and epidemiological aspects of the many entities affecting the skeleton receive appropriate consideration. This is the Journal of the International Skeletal Society and the Official Journal of the Society of Skeletal Radiology and the Australasian Musculoskelelal Imaging Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信